Critical Reasoning Butler: April 2025 |
April 24 | CR 1 | CR 2 |
__________________________________
CR 1 Consumer: The problem with bottled spring water is that it is no more healthy than well-filtered tap water, and many companies produce effective water filtration systems for home use. Further, the price of a 16 ounce bottle of water is, on average, over ten times that of the same amount of water run through a home filtration system. Thus, most bottled spring water producers will soon go out of business.
Which of the following, if true, most severely weakens the argument presented above?
(A) Several of the companies who bottle and sell spring water have gone out of business during the past five years.
(B) Because of the inherent costs associated with the bottling and transport, most bottled spring water suppliers are unable to reduce the wholesale prices they must charge for bottled spring water.
(C) Most consumers who regularly purchase bottled spring water base their beverage purchase decisions exclusively on preference for taste.
(D) Some people prefer the taste of tap water to that of bottled spring water.
(E) Because of technological advances and growing demand, home-based water filtration systems are more effective and more commonly available than they had been when bottled spring water was first widely distributed.
__________________________________
CR 2 Mayor of Alberville: Factories in Alberville together emitted twenty percent less carbon dioxide in 2001 than in 2000. The decline in emissions was probably due almost exclusively to the March 2001 development of floating seaweed farms, the first step toward reducing carbon dioxide emissions that, in addition to being cost-efficient, was also widespread.
Scientists: That cannot be the cause. As you yourself clearly stated, carbon dioxide emissions were reduced by twenty percent. Yet seaweed farms can only absorb ten percent of Alberville factories' emissions.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the force of the objection that the scientists present to the mayor's explanation?
(A) The cost of the seaweed farms was covered by a tax increase to industrial firms in Alberville.
(B) The number of factories in Alberville was greater in 2001 than in 2000.
(C) Seaweed farms had a greater effect on Alberville emissions levels than any other plan undertaken in Alberville.
(D) Seaweed farms are more cost-efficient than any other method of reducing emissions.
(E) When seaweed plants die, they can be used as a low-emissions fuel source.