Last visit was: 08 Nov 2024, 16:49 It is currently 08 Nov 2024, 16:49
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 08 Nov 2024
Posts: 96,667
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 87,972
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 96,667
Kudos: 675,144
 [15]
Kudos
Add Kudos
15
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 08 Nov 2024
Posts: 96,667
Own Kudos:
675,144
 [2]
Given Kudos: 87,972
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 96,667
Kudos: 675,144
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 08 Nov 2024
Posts: 96,667
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 87,972
Products:
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 96,667
Kudos: 675,144
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ashutosh_73
Joined: 19 Jan 2018
Last visit: 30 Oct 2024
Posts: 239
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 86
Location: India
Posts: 239
Kudos: 691
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi GMATNinja KarishmaB GMATGuruNY ReedArnoldMPREP AjiteshArun

I found this one difficult. I was wading through options and then narrowed them down to (C) and (E).
Please help me to understand why (C) is better than (E).
Also, I would request you review elimination process for the rest of the options.
Quote:
  (C) In the studies that included subjects with insomnia, only subjects without insomnia were significantly affected by doses of melatonin.
Why i found this option weird is that it says ONLY normal dudes were ''significantly affected'', but insomniacs CANBE somewhat affected, right?
So does this option assumes that ''only significant affected'' is ''HELPFUL'' and nothing else is HELPFUL?
Quote:
 (E) If melatonin were helpful in treating insomnia, then every person with insomnia who took doses of melatonin would appear to be significantly affected by it.
Earlier, i found this option better because it bridged the GAP between ''HELPFUL'' and ''SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECTED''.
NOW, i think this one is a TRAP, because stimulus goes from ''SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECTED'' to ''HELPFUL'', not the other way round.
Quote:
 (A) A weaker correlation between taking melatonin and the inducement of sleep was found in the studies that included people with insomnia than in the studies that did not.
Comparison is a red-herring. Correlation doesn't prove causation. Weaker correlation can be caused by Several other factors.
Maybe guys had coffee before the study?
Quote:
 (B) None of the studies that suggested that taking melatonin tablets can induce sleep examined a fully representative sample of the human population.
If we are questioning the study, then we are actually questioning the conclusion. If Study was faulty, then we can't say that Melatonin is NOT helpful. Maybe Melatonin is helpful, maybe it is NOT.
Quote:
(D) Several people who were in control groups and only given placebos claimed that the tablets induced sleep.
Several can be 3,4. Also, how many of these several were insomniac? Not really touches the conclusion.­­­­
User avatar
ReedArnoldMPREP
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 30 Apr 2021
Last visit: 07 Nov 2024
Posts: 521
Own Kudos:
503
 [2]
Given Kudos: 37
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V47
Posts: 521
Kudos: 503
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ashutosh_73
Hi GMATNinja KarishmaB GMATGuruNY ReedArnoldMPREP AjiteshArun

I found this one difficult. I was wading through options and then narrowed them down to (C) and (E).
Please help me to understand why (C) is better than (E).
Also, I would request you review elimination process for the rest of the options.
Quote:
  (C) In the studies that included subjects with insomnia, only subjects without insomnia were significantly affected by doses of melatonin.
Why i found this option weird is that it says ONLY normal dudes were ''significantly affected'', but insomniacs CANBE somewhat affected, right?
So does this option assumes that ''only significant affected'' is ''HELPFUL'' and nothing else is HELPFUL?
Quote:
 (E) If melatonin were helpful in treating insomnia, then every person with insomnia who took doses of melatonin would appear to be significantly affected by it.
Earlier, i found this option better because it bridged the GAP between ''HELPFUL'' and ''SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECTED''.
NOW, i think this one is a TRAP, because stimulus goes from ''SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECTED'' to ''HELPFUL'', not the other way round.
Quote:
 (A) A weaker correlation between taking melatonin and the inducement of sleep was found in the studies that included people with insomnia than in the studies that did not.
Comparison is a red-herring. Correlation doesn't prove causation. Weaker correlation can be caused by Several other factors.
Maybe guys had coffee before the study?
Quote:
 (B) None of the studies that suggested that taking melatonin tablets can induce sleep examined a fully representative sample of the human population.
If we are questioning the study, then we are actually questioning the conclusion. If Study was faulty, then we can't say that Melatonin is NOT helpful. Maybe Melatonin is helpful, maybe it is NOT.
Quote:
(D) Several people who were in control groups and only given placebos claimed that the tablets induced sleep.
Several can be 3,4. Also, how many of these several were insomniac? Not really touches the conclusion.­­­­

Hey there,

So let's take a look at the argument and pinpoint what our precise goal is:
Quote:
Many scientific studies have suggested that taking melatonin tablets can induce sleep. But this does not mean that melatonin is helpful in treating insomnia. Most of the studies examined only people without insomnia, and in many of the studies, only a few of the subjects given melatonin appeared to be significantly affected by it.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

So the conclusion here is that we can't say melatonin is helpful in treating insomnia. Why? Well, because most studies with melatonin were on people who DON'T have insomnia, and in many studies, only a few subjects were significantly affected by melatonin. 

We want to strengthen the argument that, indeed, we cannot say melatonin is helpful in treating insomnia. But as is often the case, I want to consider the world where the 'opposite of the conclusion' is true: that is, a world where we COULD say melatonin is helpful treating insomnia. But the premises remain true: most studies had no one with insomnia, and in many studies only a few people were significantly affected. 

Well, in that case I'd bet that the people who were significantly affected had insomnia! Notice the passage **does not specify** that the 'many' studies that had 'few' people signifincantly affected were a subset of the 'most' studies that had 'no one' with insomnia! 

So, e.g., 75% of the studies had no insomnia sufferers, but 25% of the studies (which would definitely count as 'many') had a few people significantly affected. Well, if those few people were those with insomnia? This argument would be weakened! It would be strengthened if I knew those few people were NOT insomniacs. 

Going to the answers: 
Quote:
(A) A weaker correlation between taking melatonin and the inducement of sleep was found in the studies that included people with insomnia than in the studies that did not.
This is very tempting as it seems to strengthen, "Ah, melatonin caused 'less sleep' when there were insomniacs! It must not be working!" But actually, it could be helping the insomniacs. The fact that they are insomniacs might make them harder to get to sleep, which makes the correlation weaker even as it does help them sleep. 
Quote:
(B) None of the studies that suggested that taking melatonin tablets can induce sleep examined a fully representative sample of the human population
I don't need a fully representative sample of the human population... I need a good sample of those with insomnia! 
Quote:
(C) In the studies that included subjects with insomnia, only subjects without insomnia were significantly affected by doses of melatonin.
This is what i want. In the studies that did have people with insomnia, they were NOT the ones 'significantly affected' by melatonin. (To your point, maybe they were 'mildly' effected, but it does not SAY that, so I don't really want to worry about it. Taken on its own, this makes the argument MORE LIKELY that melatonin does not help insomniacs get to sleep. 
Quote:
(D) Several people who were in control groups and only given placebos claimed that the tablets induced sleep.
So some people had the placebo effect. It's not relevant to the question. 
Quote:
(E) If melatonin were helpful in treating insomnia, then every person with insomnia who took doses of melatonin would appear to be significantly affected by it.­
Okay... But the question remains were those that WERE significantly affected by melatonin the people with insomnia? This doesn't tell us either way. 
 
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 08 Nov 2024
Posts: 1,334
Own Kudos:
3,356
 [2]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert reply
Posts: 1,334
Kudos: 3,356
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The CONTRAPOSITIVE of an if-then statement is always true.
Original statement: If A, then B.
Contrapositive: If not B, then not A.

Example:
Original statement: If John is in New York City, then John is in the United States.
Contrapositive: If John is not in the United States, then John is not in New York City.

A statement and its contrapositive convey the same basic meaning.
ashutosh_73
Please help me to understand why (C) is better than (E).
Quote:
  (E) If melatonin were helpful in treating insomnia, then every person with insomnia who took doses of melatonin would appear to be significantly affected by it.
­The correct answer to a.CR will not defy common sense.
Contrapositive of E:
If at least one insomniac who takes melatonin does not appear to be significanly affected by it, then melatonin is not helpful in treating insomnia.
This statement defies logic.
Common sense tells us that the lack of a response from ONE insomniac is insufficient to draw a conclusion about ALL insomniacs.
Regardless, the argument never provides the premise in blue: we don't know whether there was at least one insomniac unaffected by melatonin.
As a result, we cannot draw the conclusion in red.
Eliminate E.­­­­­­
User avatar
ashutosh_73
Joined: 19 Jan 2018
Last visit: 30 Oct 2024
Posts: 239
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 86
Location: India
Posts: 239
Kudos: 691
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ReedArnoldMPREP
ashutosh_73
Hi GMATNinja KarishmaB GMATGuruNY ReedArnoldMPREP AjiteshArun

I found this one difficult. I was wading through options and then narrowed them down to (C) and (E).
Please help me to understand why (C) is better than (E).
Also, I would request you review elimination process for the rest of the options.
Quote:
  (C) In the studies that included subjects with insomnia, only subjects without insomnia were significantly affected by doses of melatonin.
Why i found this option weird is that it says ONLY normal dudes were ''significantly affected'', but insomniacs CANBE somewhat affected, right?
So does this option assumes that ''only significant affected'' is ''HELPFUL'' and nothing else is HELPFUL?
Quote:
 (E) If melatonin were helpful in treating insomnia, then every person with insomnia who took doses of melatonin would appear to be significantly affected by it.
Earlier, i found this option better because it bridged the GAP between ''HELPFUL'' and ''SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECTED''.
NOW, i think this one is a TRAP, because stimulus goes from ''SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECTED'' to ''HELPFUL'', not the other way round.
Quote:
 (A) A weaker correlation between taking melatonin and the inducement of sleep was found in the studies that included people with insomnia than in the studies that did not.
Comparison is a red-herring. Correlation doesn't prove causation. Weaker correlation can be caused by Several other factors.
Maybe guys had coffee before the study?
Quote:
 (B) None of the studies that suggested that taking melatonin tablets can induce sleep examined a fully representative sample of the human population.
If we are questioning the study, then we are actually questioning the conclusion. If Study was faulty, then we can't say that Melatonin is NOT helpful. Maybe Melatonin is helpful, maybe it is NOT.
Quote:
(D) Several people who were in control groups and only given placebos claimed that the tablets induced sleep.
Several can be 3,4. Also, how many of these several were insomniac? Not really touches the conclusion.­­­­

Hey there,

So let's take a look at the argument and pinpoint what our precise goal is:
Quote:
Many scientific studies have suggested that taking melatonin tablets can induce sleep. But this does not mean that melatonin is helpful in treating insomnia. Most of the studies examined only people without insomnia, and in many of the studies, only a few of the subjects given melatonin appeared to be significantly affected by it.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

So the conclusion here is that we can't say melatonin is helpful in treating insomnia. Why? Well, because most studies with melatonin were on people who DON'T have insomnia, and in many studies, only a few subjects were significantly affected by melatonin. 

We want to strengthen the argument that, indeed, we cannot say melatonin is helpful in treating insomnia. But as is often the case, I want to consider the world where the 'opposite of the conclusion' is true: that is, a world where we COULD say melatonin is helpful treating insomnia. But the premises remain true: most studies had no one with insomnia, and in many studies only a few people were significantly affected. 

Well, in that case I'd bet that the people who were significantly affected had insomnia! Notice the passage **does not specify** that the 'many' studies that had 'few' people signifincantly affected were a subset of the 'most' studies that had 'no one' with insomnia! 

So, e.g., 75% of the studies had no insomnia sufferers, but 25% of the studies (which would definitely count as 'many') had a few people significantly affected. Well, if those few people were those with insomnia? This argument would be weakened! It would be strengthened if I knew those few people were NOT insomniacs. 

Going to the answers: 
Quote:
(A) A weaker correlation between taking melatonin and the inducement of sleep was found in the studies that included people with insomnia than in the studies that did not.
This is very tempting as it seems to strengthen, "Ah, melatonin caused 'less sleep' when there were insomniacs! It must not be working!" But actually, it could be helping the insomniacs. The fact that they are insomniacs might make them harder to get to sleep, which makes the correlation weaker even as it does help them sleep. 
Quote:
(B) None of the studies that suggested that taking melatonin tablets can induce sleep examined a fully representative sample of the human population
I don't need a fully representative sample of the human population... I need a good sample of those with insomnia! 
Quote:
(C) In the studies that included subjects with insomnia, only subjects without insomnia were significantly affected by doses of melatonin.
This is what i want. In the studies that did have people with insomnia, they were NOT the ones 'significantly affected' by melatonin. (To your point, maybe they were 'mildly' effected, but it does not SAY that, so I don't really want to worry about it. Taken on its own, this makes the argument MORE LIKELY that melatonin does not help insomniacs get to sleep. 
Quote:
(D) Several people who were in control groups and only given placebos claimed that the tablets induced sleep.
So some people had the placebo effect. It's not relevant to the question. 
Quote:
(E) If melatonin were helpful in treating insomnia, then every person with insomnia who took doses of melatonin would appear to be significantly affected by it.­
Okay... But the question remains were those that WERE significantly affected by melatonin the people with insomnia? This doesn't tell us either way. 


 

Hi ReedArnoldMPREP

I am glad that i got this question wrong, otherwise i wouldn't have noticed the deep layers of the argument. Never have been happier getting one wrong!
Quote:
Well, in that case I'd bet that the people who were significantly affected had insomnia! Notice the passage **does not specify** that the 'many' studies that had 'few' people signifincantly affected were a subset of the 'most' studies that had 'no one' with insomnia! 

So, e.g., 75% of the studies had no insomnia sufferers, but 25% of the studies (which would definitely count as 'many') had a few people significantly affected. Well, if those few people were those with insomnia? This argument would be weakened! It would be strengthened if I knew those few people were NOT insomniacs. 
Above text forced me to think what happens if ''Many of the studies'' WERE  a SUBSET of ''MOST OF THE STUDIES, and how this info relates to option (C):

ALL STUDIES related to MELATONIN: 10000
MOST STUDIES without INSOMANIACS: 6000
MANY STUDIES in which only a few of the subjects given melatonin appeared to be significantly affected: 500

So, we are still left with 4000 MELATONIN STUDIES, which MAY have all INSOMANIACS. And this is where (C) comes into play and calms us down saying that none of the INSOMANIACS from those 4000 studies were affected.

I am not sure, whether my logic is sound, but thankyou for the detailed explanation. It really helped me and pressed me think more!
 




 ­
User avatar
ashutosh_73
Joined: 19 Jan 2018
Last visit: 30 Oct 2024
Posts: 239
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 86
Location: India
Posts: 239
Kudos: 691
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
GMATGuruNY
The CONTRAPOSITIVE of an if-then statement is always true.
Original statement: If A, then B.
Contrapositive: If not B, then not A.

Example:
Original statement: If John is in New York City, then John is in the United States.
Contrapositive: If John is not in the United States, then John is not in New York City.

A statement and its contrapositive convey the same basic meaning.
ashutosh_73
Please help me to understand why (C) is better than (E).
Quote:
  (E) If melatonin were helpful in treating insomnia, then every person with insomnia who took doses of melatonin would appear to be significantly affected by it.


 
­The correct answer to a.CR will not defy common sense.
Contrapositive of E:
If at least one insomniac who takes melatonin does not appear to be significanly affected by it, then melatonin is not helpful in treating insomnia.
This statement defies logic.
Common sense tells us that the lack of a response from ONE insomniac is insufficient to draw a conclusion about ALL insomniacs.
Regardless, the argument never provides the premise in blue: we don't know whether there was at least one insomniac unaffected by melatonin.
As a result, we cannot draw the conclusion in red.
Eliminate E.­­­­­­
­Hi GMATGuruNY I can see, why (E) adds nothing to the argument.
Quote:
Contrapositive of E:
If at least one insomniac who takes melatonin does not appear to be significanly affected by it, then melatonin is not helpful in treating insomnia.
I think, rather the contrapositive of (E) CAN BE INFERRED from ''Most of the studies examined only people without insomnia, and in many of the studies, only a few of the subjects given melatonin appeared to be significantly affected by it.''

If ''Many studies'' are the subset of ''Most of the studies'', then we still will be left with ''Many studies'' in which at-least 1-guy was significantly affected by Melatonin.

As in: ALL STUDIES related to MELATONIN: 10000
MOST STUDIES without INSOMANIACS: 6000
MANY STUDIES in which only a few of the subjects given melatonin appeared to be significantly affected: 2000
Remaining studies: 4000. 
Out of this 4000 studies, 1 guy was significantly affected, yet we can say that ''Melatonin wasn't helpful''­
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 08 Nov 2024
Posts: 15,449
Own Kudos:
69,363
 [2]
Given Kudos: 448
Location: Pune, India
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 15,449
Kudos: 69,363
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Quote:
Many scientific studies have suggested that taking melatonin tablets can induce sleep. But this does not mean that melatonin is helpful in treating insomnia. Most of the studies examined only people without insomnia, and in many of the studies, only a few of the subjects given melatonin appeared to be significantly affected by it.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

(A) A weaker correlation between taking melatonin and the inducement of sleep was found in the studies that included people with insomnia than in the studies that did not.

(B) None of the studies that suggested that taking melatonin tablets can induce sleep examined a fully representative sample of the human population.

(C) In the studies that included subjects with insomnia, only subjects without insomnia were significantly affected by doses of melatonin.

(D) Several people who were in control groups and only given placebos claimed that the tablets induced sleep.

(E) If melatonin were helpful in treating insomnia, then every person with insomnia who took doses of melatonin would appear to be significantly affected by it.
Don't get lost in the quantifiers - keep it simple. 

Premises: 
Many scientific studies have suggested that taking melatonin tablets can induce sleep.
Most of the studies examined only people without insomnia, and in many of the studies, only a few of the subjects given melatonin appeared to be significantly affected by it.

Conclusion: But this does not mean that melatonin is helpful in treating insomnia.


Here is the thing - the premises do not tell us why and how can we say that ­melatonin may not be helpful in treating insomnia. They give some data abotu what happens in studies which examined people without insomnia. How melatonin affects them is irrelevant to our argument. Focus on the conclusion. Point is the impact it has in people with insomnia. 

(A) A weaker correlation between taking melatonin and the inducement of sleep was found in the studies that included people with insomnia than in the studies that did not.

Weaker correlation does not mean no correlation. Even if it does not affect people with insomnia as much as others, if it does affect them to some extent, it could still be used to treat insomnia. 

(B) None of the studies that suggested that taking melatonin tablets can induce sleep examined a fully representative sample of the human population.

No study by itself is fully representative but we are considering many studies here. Also, our conclusion is about people with insomnia. We are not trying to establish something about the entire population.

(C) In the studies that included subjects with insomnia, only subjects without insomnia were significantly affected by doses of melatonin.

Exactly what we needed. What happens when these tablets are given to people with insomnia? This is our point of focus. It tells us that the tabs do not impact them. The ones who are significantly affected were all without insomnia. So then it doesn't seem to be a possible treatment for insomnia. Correct. 
Note that "significantly" means "statistically relevant". So the effects on people with insomnia were not statistically relevant.

(D) Several people who were in control groups and only given placebos claimed that the tablets induced sleep.

Perhaps placebo effect in play? We don't know. Ignore anyway. 

(E) If melatonin were helpful in treating insomnia, then every person with insomnia who took doses of melatonin would appear to be significantly affected by it.

It doesn't tell us what happens actually when people with insomnia are given melatonin. We need that info to strengthen our argument. 
There really isn't a gap between 'helpful in treating insomnia' and 'significantly affected' so this statement is not adding anything. If a medicine has no significant impact on a person, it means it is not helping treat the person. Also, it seems to be too restrictive logically. Every person may not be significantly affected. Even if many or some people are, it could be helpful in treating insomnia. 
This statement does not strengthen that 'melatonin is not helpful in treating insomnia' because it doesn't tell us whether it affects people with insomnia or not. 

Answer (C)­
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 08 Nov 2024
Posts: 1,334
Own Kudos:
3,356
 [2]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert reply
Posts: 1,334
Kudos: 3,356
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
ashutosh_73
Quote:
­Hi GMATGuruNY I can see, why (E) adds nothing to the argument.
Quote:
Contrapositive of E:
If at least one insomniac who takes melatonin does not appear to be significanly affected by it, then melatonin is not helpful in treating insomnia.
I think, rather the contrapositive of (E) CAN BE INFERRED from ''Most of the studies examined only people without insomnia, and in many of the studies, only a few of the subjects given melatonin appeared to be significantly affected by it.''

If ''Many studies'' are the subset of ''Most of the studies'', then we still will be left with ''Many studies'' in which at-least 1-guy was significantly affected by Melatonin.

As in: ALL STUDIES related to MELATONIN: 10000
MOST STUDIES without INSOMANIACS: 6000
MANY STUDIES in which only a few of the subjects given melatonin appeared to be significantly affected: 2000
Remaining studies: 4000. 
Out of this 4000 studies, 1 guy was significantly affected, yet we can say that ''Melatonin wasn't helpful''­
­An inference is a statement that MUST BE TRUE.

Passage: Most of the studies examined only people without insomnia.
Most = more than half.
This could mean 99 of 100 studies.
Thus, the following inference is valid:
AT LEAST ONE study did not examine only people without insomnia.

Note:
did not examine only people without insomnia = included AT LEAST ONE person with insomnia.
We do not know whether any studies examined ONLY people with insomnia.

Passage: in many of the studies, only a few of the subjects given melatonin appeared to be significantly affected by it.
The passage does not state whether, among the subjects in blue, any had insomnia.
In a study that included insomniacs, it is possible that none of the subjects in blue had insomnia, that all of the subjects in blue had insomnia, or that it was a mix.
As a result -- when we evaluate the contrapositive of E -- there is no support for the premise that at least one insomniac was unaffected by melatonin.­­

This discussion is far more relevant to the LSAT than to the GMAT.
When it comes to quantifiers such as most and many, the LSAT is much more exacting.­­
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7112 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts