Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 24 May 2017, 07:03

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Many winemakers use cork stoppers; but cork stoppers can

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2007
Posts: 144
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 362 [4] , given: 0

Many winemakers use cork stoppers; but cork stoppers can [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Feb 2008, 16:25
4
KUDOS
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (01:52) wrong based on 4 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Many winemakers use cork stoppers; but cork stoppers can leak, crumble, or become
moldy, so that those winemakers must often discard a significant proportion of their
inventory of bottled wine. Bottlemaster plastic stoppers, which cannot leak, crumble,
or mold, have long been available to winemakers, at a price slightly higher than that
of traditional cork stoppers. Cork prices, however, are expected to rise dramatically in
the near future. Clearly, therefore, winemakers who still use cork but wish to keep
production costs from rising will be forced to reconsider plastic stoppers
. And
since the wine-buying public’s association of plastic stoppers with poor-quality wine
is weakening, there is an excellent chance that the Bottlemaster plastic stopper
will gain an increased share of the marked for wine-bottle stoppers
.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following
roles?

A. The first is a judgment that has been advanced in support of a position that the
argument opposes; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
B. The first is a judgment that has been advanced in support of a position that the
argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the
main conclusion of the argument.
C. The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides evidence
in support of that main conclusion.
D. The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a restatement
of that main conclusion.
E. The first is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion of the
argument; the second is that main conclusion.

Last edited by JCLEONES on 12 Feb 2008, 07:48, edited 1 time in total.
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 293
Location: SFO Bay Area
Schools: Berkeley Haas
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

Re: Bold Faced - Winemakers [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Feb 2008, 17:07
Where are the bold faces ?
Manager
Joined: 01 Nov 2007
Posts: 144
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 362 [0], given: 0

Re: Bold Faced - Winemakers [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Feb 2008, 07:50
Sorry, I have amended the question.
Thanks

suntaurian wrote:
Where are the bold faces ?
Director
Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Posts: 536
Schools: Stern, McCombs, Marshall, Wharton
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 161 [0], given: 0

Re: Bold Faced - Winemakers [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Feb 2008, 11:03
E.

'Clearly' and 'therefore' signal the first bold faced statement is a conclusion.

The second bold faced statement is structured:
Since___________,conclusion.

So they both are conclusions and the first conclusion is supporting the second one.
Manager
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Posts: 143
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 39 [0], given: 0

Re: Bold Faced - Winemakers [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Feb 2008, 12:08
I think is E too even though I found this question pretty hard for me.
Director
Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Posts: 536
Schools: Stern, McCombs, Marshall, Wharton
Followers: 7

Kudos [?]: 161 [0], given: 0

Re: Bold Faced - Winemakers [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Feb 2008, 12:28
moni77 wrote:
I think is E too even though I found this question pretty hard for me.

The first thing to do is to recognize what type of statements they are. Clearly and therefore are trigger words for a conclusion.

You would'nt say therefore or clearly unless you were trying to convince someone.

ex. The car is dirty, therefore you need to clean it.

The sentence structure of the second bold face statement indicates its a conlusion as well. Almost any time you say 'since....,' you usually follow up with some type of conclusion.

ex. Since my car is dirt, I need to clean it.

The fact that they are both conclusions rules out A, B, and C.

Between D and E you just look at the relationship between the two conclusions. The first conclusion adds support for the second one.
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Posts: 293
Location: SFO Bay Area
Schools: Berkeley Haas
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 67 [0], given: 0

Re: Bold Faced - Winemakers [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Feb 2008, 12:31
B for me.

Whats the OA ?
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Aug 2007
Posts: 346
Location: Greater New York City area
Schools: Tuck, Ross (R1), Duke, Tepper, ISB (R2), Kenan Flagler (R2)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

Re: Bold Faced - Winemakers [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Feb 2008, 20:32
suntaurian wrote:
B for me.

Whats the OA ?

Its E...Whats the OA ?
Director
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Posts: 790
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

Re: Bold Faced - Winemakers [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Feb 2008, 00:01
Conclusion: there is an excellent chance that the Bottlemaster plastic stopper
will gain an increased share of the marked for wine-bottle stoppers.

Boldface 1: Supports the conclusion
Boldface 2: Main conclusion

A. The first is a judgment that has been advanced in support of a position that the
argument opposes; the second is the main conclusion of the argument. [The first support the main conclusion – eliminate it]
B. The first is a judgment that has been advanced in support of a position that the
argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the [eliminate it]
main conclusion of the argument.
C. The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides evidence
in support of that main conclusion.[The first supports the main conclusion – eliminate it]
D. The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a restatement
of that main conclusion. [The first supports the main conclusion – eliminate it]
E. The first is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion of the
argument; the second is that main conclusion. [Hold it]

Re: Bold Faced - Winemakers   [#permalink] 14 Feb 2008, 00:01
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Since the routine use of antibiotics can give rise to 1 17 Nov 2010, 00:34
I was curious if the word 'BECUASE' can ever be used to 7 30 Nov 2010, 11:03
Certain instruments used in veterinary surgery can be made 6 16 Feb 2010, 04:04
well...many people have said that by using LSAT bible for 0 28 Oct 2009, 21:45
Since the routine use of antibiotics can give rise to 7 25 Dec 2007, 09:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Many winemakers use cork stoppers; but cork stoppers can

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.