Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
20 Sep 2017, 02:11
Kudos
Bookmarks
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
45%
(medium)
Question Stats:
66% (01:46) correct
34%
(01:59)
wrong
based on 1904
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Marine biologists had hypothesized that lobsters kept together in lobster traps eat one another in response to hunger. Periodic checking of lobster traps, however, has revealed instances of lobsters sharing traps together for weeks. Eight lobsters even shared one trap together for two months without eating one another. The marine biologists’ hypothesis, therefore, is clearly wrong.
The argument against the marine biologists’ hypothesis is based on which one of the following assumptions?
(A) Lobsters not caught in lobster traps have been observed eating one another.
(B) Two months is the longest known period during which eight or more lobsters have been trapped together.
(C) It is unusual to find as many as eight lobsters caught together in one single trap.
(D) Members of other marine species sometimes eat their own kind when no other food sources are available.
(E) Any food that the eight lobsters in the trap might have obtained was not enough to ward off hunger.
Source: LSAT
The argument against the marine biologists’ hypothesis is based on which one of the following assumptions?
(A) Lobsters not caught in lobster traps have been observed eating one another.
(B) Two months is the longest known period during which eight or more lobsters have been trapped together.
(C) It is unusual to find as many as eight lobsters caught together in one single trap.
(D) Members of other marine species sometimes eat their own kind when no other food sources are available.
(E) Any food that the eight lobsters in the trap might have obtained was not enough to ward off hunger.
Source: LSAT
12 Apr 2021, 07:45
Kudos
Bookmarks
broall
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION
(A) No. The argument is concerned only with trapped lobsters.
(B) No. If this choice were false—i.e., if two months was not the longest known period eight or more lobsters were trapped together—the conclusion would
not be weakened.
(C) No. This is irrelevant.
(D) No. This is irrelevant—the argument is only about lobsters.
(E) Yes. Perhaps food drifted into the cage from a current, or perhaps other creatures that the lobsters feed on entered the cage. To be valid, the argument must assume that any food which entered the cage was not sufficient to satisfy the lobsters’ hunger.
General Discussion
20 Sep 2017, 05:05
Kudos
Bookmarks
[quote="broall"]Marine biologists had hypothesized that lobsters kept together in lobster traps eat one another in response to hunger. Periodic checking of lobster traps, however, has revealed instances of lobsters sharing traps together for weeks. Eight lobsters even shared one trap together for two months without eating one another. The marine biologists’ hypothesis, therefore, is clearly wrong.
The argument against the marine biologists’ hypothesis is based on which one of the following assumptions?
(A) Lobsters not caught in lobster traps have been observed eating one another.
(B) Two months is the longest known period during which eight or more lobsters have been trapped together.
(C) It is unusual to find as many as eight lobsters caught together in one single trap.
(D) Members of other marine species sometimes eat their own kind when no other food sources are available.
(E) Any food that the eight lobsters in the trap might have obtained was not enough to ward off hunger.
The answer is E and the explaination for the same is
And while I'm guilty of this myself many times in the past, let me try to be very precise in how the Negation Test works. It's not that the negation of the correct answer will destroy the conclusion, but that it makes it so the conclusion does not follow from the evidence offered. So after negating answer choice (E), the conclusion that lobsters do not eat one another in response to hunger may still be true, but we would not be able to use the evidence provided to support such a conclusion. An assumption of this argument is that the lobsters were in fact hungry. Without that assumption the example of the lobsters would be irrelevant to a claim about what happens to lobsters in response to hunger. Answer choice (E) simply provides this assumption.
Let's take a look at the incorrect answer choices:
(A) undermines the argument that lobsters will not each other in response to hunger.
(B) is irrelevant. Two months is more than enough time to allow a lobster to become hungry, and if it wasn't, that would again simply undermine the argument.
(C) is irrelevant. The frequency with which lobsters are caught in large groups plays no role in what happens once they are.
(D) is tempting in that it suggests the behavior is common at least on other marine species, but while it helps, it is not a Necessary Assumption of the argument.
The argument against the marine biologists’ hypothesis is based on which one of the following assumptions?
(A) Lobsters not caught in lobster traps have been observed eating one another.
(B) Two months is the longest known period during which eight or more lobsters have been trapped together.
(C) It is unusual to find as many as eight lobsters caught together in one single trap.
(D) Members of other marine species sometimes eat their own kind when no other food sources are available.
(E) Any food that the eight lobsters in the trap might have obtained was not enough to ward off hunger.
The answer is E and the explaination for the same is
And while I'm guilty of this myself many times in the past, let me try to be very precise in how the Negation Test works. It's not that the negation of the correct answer will destroy the conclusion, but that it makes it so the conclusion does not follow from the evidence offered. So after negating answer choice (E), the conclusion that lobsters do not eat one another in response to hunger may still be true, but we would not be able to use the evidence provided to support such a conclusion. An assumption of this argument is that the lobsters were in fact hungry. Without that assumption the example of the lobsters would be irrelevant to a claim about what happens to lobsters in response to hunger. Answer choice (E) simply provides this assumption.
Let's take a look at the incorrect answer choices:
(A) undermines the argument that lobsters will not each other in response to hunger.
(B) is irrelevant. Two months is more than enough time to allow a lobster to become hungry, and if it wasn't, that would again simply undermine the argument.
(C) is irrelevant. The frequency with which lobsters are caught in large groups plays no role in what happens once they are.
(D) is tempting in that it suggests the behavior is common at least on other marine species, but while it helps, it is not a Necessary Assumption of the argument.
