GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 19 Feb 2019, 05:00

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in February
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272812
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### Free GMAT Prep Hour

February 20, 2019

February 20, 2019

08:00 PM EST

09:00 PM EST

Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics. Wednesday, February 20th at 8 PM EST

February 21, 2019

February 21, 2019

10:00 PM PST

11:00 PM PST

Kick off your 2019 GMAT prep with a free 7-day boot camp that includes free online lessons, webinars, and a full GMAT course access. Limited for the first 99 registrants! Feb. 21st until the 27th.

# Marine biologists had hypothesized that lobsters kept together

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior CR Moderator
Status: Long way to go!
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 1366
Location: Viet Nam

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2017, 01:11
5
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

65% (01:41) correct 35% (02:00) wrong based on 499 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Marine biologists had hypothesized that lobsters kept together in lobster traps eat one another in response to hunger. Periodic checking of lobster traps, however, has revealed instances of lobsters sharing traps together for weeks. Eight lobsters even shared one trap together for two months without eating one another. The marine biologists’ hypothesis, therefore, is clearly wrong.

The argument against the marine biologists’ hypothesis is based on which one of the following assumptions?

(A) Lobsters not caught in lobster traps have been observed eating one another.

(B) Two months is the longest known period during which eight or more lobsters have been trapped together.

(C) It is unusual to find as many as eight lobsters caught together in one single trap.

(D) Members of other marine species sometimes eat their own kind when no other food sources are available.

(E) Any food that the eight lobsters in the trap might have obtained was not enough to ward off hunger.

Source: LSAT

_________________
Intern
Joined: 04 Apr 2016
Posts: 18

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2017, 04:05
2
1
[quote="broall"]Marine biologists had hypothesized that lobsters kept together in lobster traps eat one another in response to hunger. Periodic checking of lobster traps, however, has revealed instances of lobsters sharing traps together for weeks. Eight lobsters even shared one trap together for two months without eating one another. The marine biologists’ hypothesis, therefore, is clearly wrong.

The argument against the marine biologists’ hypothesis is based on which one of the following assumptions?

(A) Lobsters not caught in lobster traps have been observed eating one another.

(B) Two months is the longest known period during which eight or more lobsters have been trapped together.

(C) It is unusual to find as many as eight lobsters caught together in one single trap.

(D) Members of other marine species sometimes eat their own kind when no other food sources are available.

(E) Any food that the eight lobsters in the trap might have obtained was not enough to ward off hunger.

The answer is E and the explaination for the same is

And while I'm guilty of this myself many times in the past, let me try to be very precise in how the Negation Test works. It's not that the negation of the correct answer will destroy the conclusion, but that it makes it so the conclusion does not follow from the evidence offered. So after negating answer choice (E), the conclusion that lobsters do not eat one another in response to hunger may still be true, but we would not be able to use the evidence provided to support such a conclusion. An assumption of this argument is that the lobsters were in fact hungry. Without that assumption the example of the lobsters would be irrelevant to a claim about what happens to lobsters in response to hunger. Answer choice (E) simply provides this assumption.

Let's take a look at the incorrect answer choices:

(A) undermines the argument that lobsters will not each other in response to hunger.
(B) is irrelevant. Two months is more than enough time to allow a lobster to become hungry, and if it wasn't, that would again simply undermine the argument.
(C) is irrelevant. The frequency with which lobsters are caught in large groups plays no role in what happens once they are.
(D) is tempting in that it suggests the behavior is common at least on other marine species, but while it helps, it is not a Necessary Assumption of the argument.
_________________

Keep giving Kudos if you find the post useful

Intern
Joined: 04 Nov 2015
Posts: 37

### Show Tags

20 Sep 2017, 04:07
broall wrote:
Marine biologists had hypothesized that lobsters kept together in lobster traps eat one another in response to hunger. Periodic checking of lobster traps, however, has revealed instances of lobsters sharing traps together for weeks. Eight lobsters even shared one trap together for two months without eating one another. The marine biologists’ hypothesis, therefore, is clearly wrong.

The argument against the marine biologists’ hypothesis is based on which one of the following assumptions?

(A) Lobsters not caught in lobster traps have been observed eating one another.

(B) Two months is the longest known period during which eight or more lobsters have been trapped together.

(C) It is unusual to find as many as eight lobsters caught together in one single trap.

(D) Members of other marine species sometimes eat their own kind when no other food sources are available.

(E) Any food that the eight lobsters in the trap might have obtained was not enough to ward off hunger.

Source: LSAT

I will go with option E.
Any food that the eight lobsters in the trap might have obtained was not enough to ward off hunger.

Negate that:

Any food that the eight lobsters in the trap might have obtained WAS enough to ward off hunger.

When you negate that answer choice and have it say that the lobsters might have obtained food that was enough to keep away hunger. This would destroy the conclusion of the counter to the marine biologists.

Regards,
Sandeep
Manager
Joined: 27 Dec 2016
Posts: 233
Concentration: Marketing, Social Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.65
WE: Marketing (Education)

### Show Tags

19 Dec 2017, 23:14
broall wrote:
Marine biologists had hypothesized that lobsters kept together in lobster traps eat one another in response to hunger. Periodic checking of lobster traps, however, has revealed instances of lobsters sharing traps together for weeks. Eight lobsters even shared one trap together for two months without eating one another. The marine biologists’ hypothesis, therefore, is clearly wrong.

The argument against the marine biologists’ hypothesis is based on which one of the following assumptions?

(A) Lobsters not caught in lobster traps have been observed eating one another.

(B) Two months is the longest known period during which eight or more lobsters have been trapped together.

(C) It is unusual to find as many as eight lobsters caught together in one single trap.

(D) Members of other marine species sometimes eat their own kind when no other food sources are available.

(E) Any food that the eight lobsters in the trap might have obtained was not enough to ward off hunger.

Source: LSAT

After reading this argument, I felt that this conclusion has the gap.. So, two months mean that lobsters are suffered from hunger?

Answer E clearly bridging the gap. Yes, they are hungry! So, why they don't eat one another? --> The conclusion, then, IS WRONG.

Wdyt?
_________________

There's an app for that - Steve Jobs.

BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1219
Location: India
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4

### Show Tags

28 Dec 2017, 10:10
1
Marine biologists had hypothesized that lobsters kept together in lobster traps eat one another in response to hunger. Periodic checking of lobster traps, however, has revealed instances of lobsters sharing traps together for weeks. Eight lobsters even shared one trap together for two months without eating one another. The marine biologists’ hypothesis, therefore, is clearly wrong.

The argument against the marine biologists’ hypothesis is based on which one of the following assumptions?

(A) Lobsters not caught in lobster traps have been observed eating one another. -Out of scope

(B) Two months is the longest known period during which eight or more lobsters have been trapped together. -Doesn't matter. It doesn't tell us as to why the lobsters don't eat each other

(C) It is unusual to find as many as eight lobsters caught together in one single trap. -out of scope

(D) Members of other marine species sometimes eat their own kind when no other food sources are available. -Lobsters? This would in a way strengthen biologist's argument

(E) Any food that the eight lobsters in the trap might have obtained was not enough to ward off hunger. -Correct
_________________
Re: Marine biologists had hypothesized that lobsters kept together   [#permalink] 28 Dec 2017, 10:10
Display posts from previous: Sort by