I'm in the middle of reading
"The Halo Effect:... and the Eight Other Business Delusions That Deceive Managers".LinkWow! Good book. It pretty much blows apart a lot of the analysis people do to find out what makes a company "successful".
The part that got me is that people can only define good leadership by performance.
In other words, if you're the CEO and your company has a stellar year, people automatically define your behavior as showing "strong leadership".
However, if you're the CEO and your company has a crappy year, people automatically define your behavior as showing "poor leadership".
Even if you did the exact same thing.Kinda throws a wrench into the whole "leadership training" thing, huh?
RF