Anandanwar
Hello,
The statement says 'Minnesota is the ONLY one of the contiguous forty-eight states...'
In this case if 'that' refers to 'states', then the statement does not make sense, since their is no use of 'only'.
Since 'only' has been used, a unique feature of Minnesota has to be pointed out. So 'that has...' should be correct.
And 'that' and 'where' can be parallel. Both are pronouns and can be used to refer to a state.
By the above reasoning I do not find a good enough reason to reject A.
Can Experts please explain where I am going wrong?
Regards,
Ankit
Hi
Anandanwar,
That's a good point, but keep in mind that the questions in the verbal section ask us to choose the
best option. We may absolutely find ourselves in situations where we're not rejecting an option so much as selecting another.
In this case, we find a few issues in option A:
1. It moves from a relative pronoun (
that) to a relative adverb (
where). This isn't a major problem, but why should we change the word we're using here? Surely the sentence would be easier to read with a little repetition?
2. The structure after
that (only a verb) is different from the structure after
where (subject + verb). Again, this isn't a major problem, but it does make it harder to read option A.
3. It's harder for the reader to understand what the noun phrase
this predator points to when
wolf is used as an adjective ("
sizable wolf population"). It's easier when we have a noun,
wolves. Of course, we must keep in mind that we're looking at nouns here. There's no pronoun, so we don't need to look for a singular-singular or plural-plural match.
None of these three issues is an absolute, but each of them is another reason to pick option E over option A.