Minnesota is the only one of the contiguous forty-eight states
that still has a sizable wolf population, and where this predator remains the archenemy of cattle and sheep.
(A) that still has a sizable wolf population, and where
(B) that still has a sizable wolf population, where - 'where' incorrectly refers to 'population'
(C) that still has a sizable population of wolves, and where - usage of comma+ AND is incorrect as the part that follows is not an independent clause
(D) where the population of wolves is still sizable; - the semicolon in (d) separates its meaning into two unrelated sentences; i.e., the part of (d) that follows the semicolon suggests that the wolf is still the archenemy of the sheep in general. this is almost exactly the opposite of the intended meaning, which is that Minnesota is the only state where that's still true!
(E) where there is still a sizable population of wolves and where - Correct
Answer E
1. I understand that 'that' correctly refers to 'the only one of the contiguous forty-eight states' which is Minnesota. So, there is no subject-verb agreement issue in options A-C.
2. usage of comma+ AND is incorrect in options A and C as the part that follows is not an independent clause. So, can we use this rule to eliminate?
3. Is the parallelism in options A and C incorrect or are those options just inferior to option E? Can 'that' clause be parallel to 'where' clause?
4. Does 'this predator' need to refer to a noun? sizable wolf population-- wolf is an adjective
sizable population of wolves-- wolves is a noun and it is plural too, whereas 'this predator' is singular
AjiteshArun ,
GMATNinja ,
MagooshExpert ,
GMATGuruNY ,
VeritasPrepBrian ,
MartyTargetTestPrep ,
DmitryFarber ,
VeritasKarishma ,
generis ,
jennpt , other experts - please enlighten