Last visit was: 01 May 2026, 06:22 It is currently 01 May 2026, 06:22
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
thangvietnam
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 04 Apr 2026
Posts: 743
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,198
Posts: 743
Kudos: 419
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Crytiocanalyst
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Last visit: 27 May 2023
Posts: 942
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 309
Posts: 942
Kudos: 214
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
tinbq
Joined: 04 Nov 2016
Last visit: 26 May 2024
Posts: 114
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 599
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.12
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V38
Posts: 114
Kudos: 24
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 30 Apr 2026
Posts: 3,908
Own Kudos:
3,586
 [1]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,908
Kudos: 3,586
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tinbq
Would you please help to explain why B is incorrect? I have read some comments claiming that WHO paid the $7 is missing. Is that information necessary?
Oh yes @tinbq; GMAT takes this who issue very seriously :) .

Basically B is (what's called) passive voice: it's essentially saying:

$7 was previously paid for higher education.

As happens very frequently with passive voice constructs, the above construct is not depicting who previously paid $7 for higher education.

The intent of the original sentence is to depict that students previously paid $7 for higher education.

A better construct (though not perfect) for option B would be:

B1. year toward the cost of higher education, for which they previously paid $7 per year

Notice that B1 now clearly mentions that they (students) previously paid $7 for higher education.
avatar
rachelphwu
Joined: 02 Feb 2022
Last visit: 08 Apr 2022
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 13
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tylerk1986
I believe the answer is D.

Reasoning:
There are no grammatical flaws in sentences D or E that I notice. I even believe that sentence E sounds better because it goes along with the sentence. Students boycotting, leads you to believe that the new amount of money that students are forced to pay opposes the old amount.

However, putting "as opposed to" into the sentence changes the meaning of the original. The original only indicates that there are new amounts to be paid. It doesn't offer that the amounts are "opposing" each other

Hi everyone, I have a question.
When dealing with SC questions, should we consider the meaning of the original sentence? Is it alright to choose an option with a different meaning from the original one?
Thank you! :)
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 01 May 2026
Posts: 6,297
Own Kudos:
6,256
 [1]
Given Kudos: 45
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 6,297
Kudos: 6,256
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rachelphwu
tylerk1986
I believe the answer is D.

Reasoning:
There are no grammatical flaws in sentences D or E that I notice. I even believe that sentence E sounds better because it goes along with the sentence. Students boycotting, leads you to believe that the new amount of money that students are forced to pay opposes the old amount.

However, putting "as opposed to" into the sentence changes the meaning of the original. The original only indicates that there are new amounts to be paid. It doesn't offer that the amounts are "opposing" each other

Hi everyone, I have a question.
When dealing with SC questions, should we consider the meaning of the original sentence? Is it alright to choose an option with a different meaning from the original one?
Thank you! :)

Hello rachelphwu,

We hope this finds you well.

Our advice would be to take the meaning of Option A as a baseline unless this meaning is completely illogical or incoherent.

Further, if Option A and all answer choices that preserve its meaning are grammatically incorrect, then pick whichever answer choice is grammatically correct, even if its meaning does not line up with Option A's.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
naveeng15
Joined: 08 Dec 2021
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 87
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 42
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Leadership
GMAT Focus 1: 555 Q80 V77 DI76
GMAT 1: 610 Q47 V28
WE:Design (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 555 Q80 V77 DI76
GMAT 1: 610 Q47 V28
Posts: 87
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
says that the higher education was previously paying $7

B The phrase - for which was previously paid $7 per year - is too awkward to consider
In C - previously $7 per year - is grammatically wrong. Previously is an adverb and can not modify the noun of $7

D has no flaws as such and is the best answer.

E -as opposed to -is not the right idiom to describe comparison, unless the arms of the comparison are positioned opposite to the others physically? In a weird way, E may also give the feeling that the students were in fact opposed to the $7 per year.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 01 May 2026
Posts: 6,084
Own Kudos:
5,141
 [2]
Given Kudos: 744
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 6,084
Kudos: 5,141
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rachelphwu
Hi everyone, I have a question.
When dealing with SC questions, should we consider the meaning of the original sentence? Is it alright to choose an option with a different meaning from the original one?
Thank you! :)
Hi rachelphwu,

Option A is not special in any way. This means that the underlined portion of the sentence is just as likely to contain a meaning error as any other option.
User avatar
beeblebrox
Joined: 08 Dec 2020
Last visit: 24 Oct 2022
Posts: 60
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 922
Posts: 60
Kudos: 36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi AndrewN sir

I want ask about the usage of "instead of" in option D.

From what I understand "Instead of" must be strictly followed by Noun. Here, "instead of" is followed by Noun + noun modifier. Is such a use acceptable? Can we also use gerund after "instead of" ?

thanks.
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,490
Own Kudos:
7,670
 [3]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,490
Kudos: 7,670
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
beeblebrox
Hi AndrewN sir

I want ask about the usage of "instead of" in option D.

From what I understand "Instead of" must be strictly followed by Noun. Here, "instead of" is followed by Noun + noun modifier. Is such a use acceptable? Can we also use gerund after "instead of" ?

thanks.
Hello, beeblebrox. Yes, instead of can be followed by a noun or noun phrase, even if traditional grammar sources remove the infinitive (phrase) from that list. For example, in the sentence, Instead of cycling, he prefers to take the bus to work, it might be frowned upon to replace the gerund cycling with the infinitive cycle. For GMAT™ purposes, you can be 100 percent sure that a noun phrase, not just a one-word noun, may follow instead of if you see such usage in a correct answer, as we do in (D) above. Keep in mind, too, that rather than can be used in place of instead of in any pertinent comparison, but not the other way around. There are a number of official questions in which you see the two constructs tested. I will spoil just a few from different editions of the OG:

1) In metalwork one...

2) Judge Bonham denied...

3) Nuclear fusion is...

4) Rather than ignore...

5) Recently discovered fossil...

I would urge you not to look to create absolute rules regarding the usage of instead of. When you come across the construct in official SC questions, take note of what you find. The more you see a consistent usage, the greater your degree of confidence can be in that usage on the exam.

Thank you for thinking to ask.

- Andrew
User avatar
pratishtha1210
Joined: 11 Jul 2019
Last visit: 07 Jun 2023
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 239
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V30
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V30
Posts: 17
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi MartyTargetTestPrep

I am so confused about this one ...

In option A paying is a participle so wont it modify subject of the preceding clause i.e. students ?
hence students are those who are paying ...
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,471
Own Kudos:
5,646
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1,430
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,471
Kudos: 5,646
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pratishtha1210
Hi MartyTargetTestPrep

I am so confused about this one ...

In option A paying is a participle so wont it modify subject of the preceding clause i.e. students ?
hence students are those who are paying ...
Hi pratishtha1210.

In this case, what "paying" in (A) modifies is not clear because the sentence version is such a mess.

It could modify "them to contribute ..." or, further back, "Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted ...."

In neither case is a logical meaning conveyed.
avatar
ankitbagla
Joined: 24 Sep 2011
Last visit: 25 Nov 2022
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 45
Location: India
Schools: IIM
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V26
GPA: 4
Schools: IIM
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V26
Posts: 13
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AndrewN
beeblebrox
Hi AndrewN sir

I want ask about the usage of "instead of" in option D.

From what I understand "Instead of" must be strictly followed by Noun. Here, "instead of" is followed by Noun + noun modifier. Is such a use acceptable? Can we also use gerund after "instead of" ?

thanks.
Hello, beeblebrox. Yes, instead of can be followed by a noun or noun phrase, even if traditional grammar sources remove the infinitive (phrase) from that list. For example, in the sentence, Instead of cycling, he prefers to take the bus to work, it might be frowned upon to replace the gerund cycling with the infinitive cycle. For GMAT™ purposes, you can be 100 percent sure that a noun phrase, not just a one-word noun, may follow instead of if you see such usage in a correct answer, as we do in (D) above. Keep in mind, too, that rather than can be used in place of instead of in any pertinent comparison, but not the other way around. There are a number of official questions in which you see the two constructs tested. I will spoil just a few from different editions of the OG:

1) In metalwork one...

2) Judge Bonham denied...

3) Nuclear fusion is...

4) Rather than ignore...

5) Recently discovered fossil...

I would urge you not to look to create absolute rules regarding the usage of instead of. When you come across the construct in official SC questions, take note of what you find. The more you see a consistent usage, the greater your degree of confidence can be in that usage on the exam.

Thank you for thinking to ask.

- Andrew



Hello AndrewN ,

I have seen in official correct answers for the usage of instead in which shall be followed by noun as it is a preposition.
However , for the case in correct answer , ‘ instead of ‘ is followed by participle adverb .
Is this usage acceptable ?
I eliminated this choice on the basis of above .

Thanks .

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,490
Own Kudos:
7,670
 [3]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,490
Kudos: 7,670
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ankitbagla
Hello AndrewN ,

I have seen in official correct answers for the usage of instead in which shall be followed by noun as it is a preposition.
However , for the case in correct answer , ‘ instead of ‘ is followed by participle adverb .
Is this usage acceptable ?
I eliminated this choice on the basis of above .

Thanks .
Hello, ankitbagla. I might understand better what you were driving at if you provided examples of these official correct answers. If you are wondering whether answer choice (D) could be rewritten above to place the modifier ahead of the noun that follows instead of, the answer is yes: instead of the previously required $7 per year would be fine. Notice that the modifier is contained within the noun phrase, though, with the marking the beginning of that phrase.

The bottom line is that we should not blindly adhere to rules, or to what we think are rules. And if an official question seems to flout such a rule in a correct answer, then there is probably more to that issue than meets the eye.

Thank you for following up.

- Andrew
User avatar
EricaAlves
Joined: 02 Jun 2022
Last visit: 19 Jun 2022
Posts: 6
Location: India
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V43
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V43
Posts: 6
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,

In this SC question, your knowledge of understanding- 'Meaning + Modifiers + Wordiness' is tested.

Option A: wrong modifier- higher education
Option B: passive construction, meaning distorted
Option C: meaningless comparison- year & cost
Option E: wordy & distorts meaning
User avatar
akt715
Joined: 12 May 2021
Last visit: 06 Aug 2023
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 126
Posts: 57
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In option C and E , 'toward the cost of higher education' and 'previously for the cost of the higher education' come in later parts of the comparison and thus it seems like they are modifying the later parts .

Can I reject the options on the basis of such errors in actual exam, or Should I look for other errors ?
User avatar
RonTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 19 Jul 2022
Last visit: 07 Nov 2022
Posts: 429
Own Kudos:
541
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 429
Kudos: 541
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
akt715
In option C and E , 'toward the cost of higher education' and 'previously for the cost of the higher education' come in later parts of the comparison and thus it seems like they are modifying the later parts .

Can I reject the options on the basis of such errors in actual exam, or Should I look for other errors ?

That's not a problem, because "toward the cost of higher education" applies to BOTH of the dollar figures. (It's weird that they're in dollars rather than euros. 🤷🏿‍♀️)
The correct answer could also have been written as, e.g.,
Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a one-day strike to protest a law that requires them to contribute $330 a year, instead of the $7 per year required previously, toward the cost of higher education.


"For the cost of higher education", in choice E, absurdly implies that these figures represent the entire cost of higher education! (This is an idiom that you almost certainly know: If somebody asks you "How much did you pay FOR that?", she/he is asking you for the whole price that you paid, not some fractional contribution to it.)


Choice C is trying to use an adverb ("previously") to modify a noun ("$7"). That's not allowed.
User avatar
bhavyasetia
Joined: 23 Jul 2022
Last visit: 02 Sep 2022
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 31
Posts: 6
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is the use of "instead of" correct ? I have seen in many gmat sc correction lessons that "instead of" appears only in wrong answers choices as gmat does not prefer it but "instead" is fine.
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 01 May 2026
Posts: 6,297
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 45
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 6,297
Kudos: 6,256
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bhavyasetia
Is the use of "instead of" correct ? I have seen in many gmat sc correction lessons that "instead of" appears only in wrong answers choices as gmat does not prefer it but "instead" is fine.

Hello bhavyasetia,

We hope this finds you well.

To clarify, both "instead" and "instead of" are perfectly acceptable on GMAT, although "rather than" is the preferred usage.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
RonTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 19 Jul 2022
Last visit: 07 Nov 2022
Posts: 429
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 429
Kudos: 541
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bhavyasetia
Is the use of "instead of" correct ?

This is an official problem from GMAC, so, you know the answer to this.




Quote:
I have seen in many gmat sc correction lessons that "instead of" appears only in wrong answers choices as gmat does not prefer it but "instead" is fine.

Well, now you've seen it in a correct answer. (:

Instead of and rather than actually have slightly different meanings.
In the construction X rather than Y, 'X' and 'Y' are just two options/choices/alternatives. This construction does not imply that one of the two is 'expected', 'typical', 'standard', 'normal', 'usual' etc.
The construction X instead of Y, on the other hand, implies that Y is the normal/usual/standard/expected/default choice, for which X is an unexpected/nonstandard substitute.

E.g.,
On her vacation, my sister has been showering with shower gel rather than bar soap. —> Sis was using bar soap at some other point (otherwise I wouldn't be randomly mentioning it), but right now she's using shower gel because that is just what's available at her hotel/airbnb/friend's house. Sis doesn't have a strong preference between the two.

I had to clear the jammed toilet with my hand instead of a plunger. —> I would DEFINITELY rather use a plunger, LOL. A plunger would certainly be the default/standard choice here, but, in an emergent situation with no plunger around, I might need to use my hand instead. Eww gross disgusting.
   1   2   3   4   5   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
513 posts
363 posts