GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 20 Oct 2019, 19:50

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 03 Feb 2013
Posts: 835
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Re: Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Jun 2015, 10:39
9
1
13
Most of Portugal’s 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a one-day strike to protest a law that requires them to contribute \$330 a year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying \$7 per year.

A. year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying \$7 per year
B. year toward the cost of higher education, for which was previously paid \$7 per year
C. year, compared to the previously \$7 per year, toward the cost of higher education
D. year toward the cost of higher education, instead of the \$7 per year required previously
E. year as opposed to the \$7 per year required previously for the cost of higher education

A. year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying \$7 per year
The clause before the comma + verbing is "that (refers to law) requires them to contribute \$330 a year toward the cost of the higher education"
so verb+ing should modify the previous clause and should make sense with the subject of the clause. Definitely "law" is not paying.

B. year toward the cost of higher education, for which was previously paid \$7 per year
who previously paid ? not clear

C. year, compared to the previously \$7 per year, toward the cost of higher education
Previously is an adverb so it should modify a verb. we don't have a verb here.

D. year toward the cost of higher education, instead of the \$7 per year required previously
Looks least of the devils

E. year as opposed to the \$7 per year required previously for the cost of higher education
"as opposed to" is not a comparison marker but it is a contrast marker . We need a comparison marker.
_________________
Thanks,
Kinjal

My Application Experience : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267-40.html#p1516961

Please click on Kudos, if you think the post is helpful
Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2015
Posts: 93
Concentration: Real Estate, International Business
GMAT 1: 600 Q33 V40
GPA: 3.3
Re: Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Feb 2016, 10:35
1
I simplified the sentence into:

The law requires \$300 instead of \$7.

Narrowed it down to D or E. Do we use "instead of" or "as opposed to."

"As opposed to" sounds a lot more negative than instead of. I would say, "instead of 7" or, "as opposed to not paying at all!"
Retired Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2861
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Feb 2016, 11:56
2
1
DJ1986 wrote:
I simplified the sentence into:

The law requires \$300 instead of \$7.

Narrowed it down to D or E. Do we use "instead of" or "as opposed to."

"As opposed to" sounds a lot more negative than instead of. I would say, "instead of 7" or, "as opposed to not paying at all!"

Here is how I view the comparisons in D and E:

D: X instead of Y. X = \$330 a year toward the cost of higher education, Y = the \$7 per year required previously

E: X as opposed to Y. X = \$330 a year, Y = the \$7 per year required previously for the cost of higher education

In D, it is clear why \$330 is required. It is also clear why \$7 was required, because the sentence states the \$7 required previously.
In E, it is not clear why \$330 is required. It is nonetheless clear why \$7 was required previously.

Because of the lack of clarity about \$330 a year in E, D is a better option.
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2509
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Re: Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

24 Mar 2016, 18:59
I could easily eliminate A, B, and E..and between C and D, I picked C.
7\$ -> seven is an adjective - previously modifies the adjective, no? i understand that it is not explicitly written in this form..but in D "instead of" made me think twice whether it is correct...
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9704
Location: Pune, India
Re: Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Mar 2016, 08:34
mvictor wrote:
I could easily eliminate A, B, and E..and between C and D, I picked C.
7\$ -> seven is an adjective - previously modifies the adjective, no? i understand that it is not explicitly written in this form..but in D "instead of" made me think twice whether it is correct...

\$7 is a thing and hence is a noun. Just like 'red car' is a thing.
So the use of previously (an adverb) is wrong here.
_________________
Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2509
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Re: Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Mar 2016, 08:40
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
mvictor wrote:
I could easily eliminate A, B, and E..and between C and D, I picked C.
7\$ -> seven is an adjective - previously modifies the adjective, no? i understand that it is not explicitly written in this form..but in D "instead of" made me think twice whether it is correct...

\$7 is a thing and hence is a noun. Just like 'red car' is a thing.
So the use of previously (an adverb) is wrong here.

but isn't the red car a complex noun? formed by an adjective + noun?
so is in this question - 7 is adjective, dollars is noun, previously 7 - makes sense, no?
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9704
Location: Pune, India
Re: Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Mar 2016, 21:47
mvictor wrote:
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
mvictor wrote:
I could easily eliminate A, B, and E..and between C and D, I picked C.
7\$ -> seven is an adjective - previously modifies the adjective, no? i understand that it is not explicitly written in this form..but in D "instead of" made me think twice whether it is correct...

\$7 is a thing and hence is a noun. Just like 'red car' is a thing.
So the use of previously (an adverb) is wrong here.

but isn't the red car a complex noun? formed by an adjective + noun?
so is in this question - 7 is adjective, dollars is noun, previously 7 - makes sense, no?

Will you say "The beautiful red car is ... " or "The beautifully red car is ..."

The point is that the entire "\$7" acts as a noun and you need an adjective to modify it, not an adverb.
_________________
Karishma
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor

Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >
Retired Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2861
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

01 Apr 2016, 05:31
1
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:

but isn't the red car a complex noun? formed by an adjective + noun?
so is in this question - 7 is adjective, dollars is noun, previously 7 - makes sense, no?

mvictor wrote:
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
mvictor wrote:
I could easily eliminate A, B, and E..and between C and D, I picked C.
7\$ -> seven is an adjective - previously modifies the adjective, no? i understand that it is not explicitly written in this form..but in D "instead of" made me think twice whether it is correct...

\$7 is a thing and hence is a noun. Just like 'red car' is a thing.
So the use of previously (an adverb) is wrong here.

Will you say "The beautiful red car is ... " or "The beautifully red car is ..."

The point is that the entire "\$7" acts as a noun and you need an adjective to modify it, not an adverb.

VeritasPrepKarishma... if we mean that the red colour is beautiful, we must use the adverb "beautifully", since it modifies the adjective "red". However if we mean that the car is beautiful, we must use adjective "beautiful" since it modifies the noun "car".

Consider a situation: The colour of the car in my opinion is not red, but someone else says that it is red. Hence I make the following statement:

I purchased the supposedly red car.

The statement would be grammatically correct. Isn't it?

Similarly, if the intent above is to modify the adjective "7", not the noun "dollar", I tend to agree with the logic of mvictor. Nonetheless, as you said, I do agree that \$7 can be considered as one object here and hence the adjective "previous" would be appropriate. Yet one could also say "previously 7 dollar," isn't it?

The price rose from previously 7 dollar to 10 dollar........... Is this sentence wrong?
Manager
Status: One Last Shot !!!
Joined: 04 May 2014
Posts: 229
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 630 Q44 V32
GMAT 2: 680 Q47 V35
Re: Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Dec 2016, 18:42
1
This is an official question, it appeared in GMAT-Prep exam pack-1 for me. And it needs more discussion. Request experts to talk about this in a bit more detail. Mostly D vs E.

Thanks!
_________________
One Kudos for an everlasting piece of knowledge is not a bad deal at all...

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things you didn't do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover.
-Mark Twain
Retired Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2861
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Dec 2016, 00:37
4
3
arhumsid wrote:
This is an official question, it appeared in GMAT-Prep exam pack-1 for me. And it needs more discussion. Request experts to talk about this in a bit more detail. Mostly D vs E.

Thanks!

In option E, it is not clear for what \$330 a year is contributed. It is alright to omit the repeated part from the second element of comparison, not from the first. Here "for the cost of higher education" appears in the second element ("the \$7 per year required previously for the cost of higher education"), but not in the first ("\$330 a year").

In option D, the part "toward the cost of higher education" can be eliminated from the second element (the \$7 per year required previously toward the cost of higher education ) since the meaning is not obscured because of this omission.

[Brief explanation of other options:

Option A and B does not highlight the comparison between the previous value and the current value.

In option C, the adverb "previously" wrongly refers to the noun phrase "\$7 per year". An adjective may refer to a noun phrase, but an adverb cannot.]
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2016
Posts: 256
Location: India
GPA: 3.9
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Mar 2017, 00:40
Hi Expert,

X instead of Y-- X and Y both should be structurally parallel.

In choice D, how X and Y are structurally parallel. Please help !
Retired Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2861
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Mar 2017, 04:09
AR15J wrote:
Hi Expert,

X instead of Y-- X and Y both should be structurally parallel.

In choice D, how X and Y are structurally parallel. Please help !

Contribute X instead of Y.

X = \$300 a year
Y = the \$7 per year

Two yearly values are compared. X is modified by "toward the cost of higher education" (prepositional phrase), and Y is modified by "required previously" (past participle), but this is not a problem - the modifiers are not compared.

However the comma before "instead" should not have been there.
Manager
Joined: 26 Mar 2016
Posts: 60
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V36
GRE 1: Q166 V147
GPA: 3.3
WE: Other (Consulting)
Re: Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

25 Jul 2017, 18:52
1
Hello Experts,

Could you please further explain the Option C
_________________
23 Kudos left to unlock next level. Help me by Contributing one for cause .. Please

My failed GMAT experience ... https://gmatclub.com/forum/gmat-bad-experience-640-need-suggestions-on-verbal-improvement-251308.html

My review on EmpowerGMAT : https://gmatclub.com/reviews/comments/empowergmat-online-course-345355767
Retired Moderator
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2861
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Re: Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Jul 2017, 07:15
Bharath99 wrote:
Hello Experts,

Could you please further explain the Option C

The adverb "previously" is wrong. An adverb must refer to a verb or an adjective. However, "\$7 per year" is a noun phrase requiring an adjective. Thus "previous" instead of "previously" should have been used. Hence option C is wrong.
Current Student
Joined: 22 Sep 2016
Posts: 159
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V35
GPA: 4
Re: Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Jul 2017, 09:10
ashkrs wrote:
Most of Portugal’s 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a one-day strike to
protest a law that requires them to contribute \$330 a year toward the cost of higher
education, previously paying \$7 per year.

A. year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying \$7 per year
B. year toward the cost of higher education, for which was previously paid \$7 per
year
C. year, compared to the previously \$7 per year, toward the cost of higher education
D. year toward the cost of higher education, instead of the \$7 per year required
previously
E. year as opposed to the \$7 per year required previously for the cost of higher
education

shouldn't it be "towards" in all the options?
_________________
Desperately need 'KUDOS' !!
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2867
Re: Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Jul 2017, 09:40
rekhabishop wrote:
ashkrs wrote:
Most of Portugal’s 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a one-day strike to
protest a law that requires them to contribute \$330 a year toward the cost of higher
education, previously paying \$7 per year.

A. year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying \$7 per year
B. year toward the cost of higher education, for which was previously paid \$7 per
year
C. year, compared to the previously \$7 per year, toward the cost of higher education
D. year toward the cost of higher education, instead of the \$7 per year required
previously
E. year as opposed to the \$7 per year required previously for the cost of higher
education

shouldn't it be "towards" in all the options?

Hello rekhabishop,

I will be glad to help you out with this one.

There is no difference in the usage of toward and towards. Both the words are used in the same context.

It is just that in American English, the word toward is used while in British English, the word towards is used.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
_________________
Current Student
Joined: 22 Apr 2017
Posts: 106
Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q46 V30
GMAT 2: 620 Q47 V29
GMAT 3: 630 Q49 V26
GMAT 4: 690 Q48 V35
GPA: 3.7
Re: Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Aug 2017, 10:24
daagh wrote:
A says that the higher education was previously paying \$7

B The phrase - for which was previously paid \$7 per year - is too awkward to consider
In C - previously \$7 per year - is grammatically wrong. Previously is an adverb and can not modify the noun of \$7

D has no flaws as such and is the best answer.

E -as opposed to -is not the right idiom to describe comparison, unless the arms of the comparison are positioned opposite to the others physically? In a weird way, E may also give the feeling that the students were in fact opposed to the \$7 per year.

Hi daagh,
Pls pardon my ignorance & since nobody has raised this point it feels awkward to be the only one. I eliminated D & E because both use "the"7\$. Is it ok to use the before a particular noun?
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2867
Re: Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

03 Aug 2017, 14:29
ManishKM1 wrote:
Hi daagh,
Pls pardon my ignorance & since nobody has raised this point it feels awkward to be the only one. I eliminated D & E because both use "the"7\$. Is it ok to use the before a particular noun?

Hello ManishKM1,

I will be glad to help you out with this one.

Any article - a, an, or the - is used before a noun entity. In Choice D and E, \$7 (7 dollar) per year is a noun entity. Hence, usage of article the before this noun entity is correct.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
_________________
Director
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 606
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Aug 2017, 07:59
5
1
A COMMA + VERBing modifier serves to express CONTEMPORANEOUS action: an action attributed to the preceding subject and happening AT THE SAME TIME as -- and often as a result of -- the preceding action.
Thus, A implies the following:
When the students contribute \$330 a year, they are AT THE SAME TIME previously paying \$7 per year.
Not the intended meaning.

B states that students must contribute \$330 a year toward their education, for which was previously paid \$7 per year.
Here, it's unclear WHO previously paid \$7 per year.
Also, a reader might construe that BOTH amounts are being applied to a student's education (the \$330 a year AND the \$7 previously paid).
To make it clear that one amount (\$330 a year) is serving to REPLACE the previous amount (\$7 per year), a word of contrast is needed (such as instead or whereas).
Eliminate B.

In C, previously (adverb) cannot serve to modify the \$7 per year (noun phrase).
Eliminate C.

In E, the reason that students must contribute \$330 a year seems to be conveyed by the modifier required previously for the cost of higher education.
The result is a nonsensical meaning:
A law that REQUIRES them to contribute \$330 a year REQUIRED PREVIOUSLY.
Eliminate E.

The correct answer is D.

Instead of is a preposition that means IN PLACE OF.
Generally, instead of + noun serves as an adverb, indicating that an action is performed upon one thing INSTEAD OF another.

In the SCs below, all of the modifiers within quotes serve the same basic function:
Each serves to FURTHER DEFINE A VALUE IN THE PRECEDING CLAUSE (shown below in upper case letters).

The law requires students to contribute \$330 A YEAR toward the cost of higher education, "instead of the \$7 per year" required previously.

Soaring television costs accounted for MORE THAN HALF the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, "a greater proportion" than in any previous election.

Companies in the United States are providing job training and general education for nearly EIGHT MILLION PEOPLE, "about as many" as are enrolled in the nation’s four-year colleges and universities.

Siberia's Lake Baikal holds 20 PERCENT of the world's fresh water, "more than all" the North American Great Lakes combined.

These sorts of modifiers are VERY COMMON on the GMAT.
COMMA + instead of + noun is simply one example of this type of modifier.

option D: X instead of Y. X = \$330 a year toward the cost of higher education, Y = the \$7 per year required previously

option E: X as opposed to Y. X = \$330 a year, Y = the \$7 per year required previously for the cost of higher education

In D, it is clear why \$330 is required. It is also clear why \$7 was required, because the sentence states the \$7 required previously.
In E, it is not clear why \$330 is required. It is nonetheless clear why \$7 was required previously.

Because of the lack of clarity about \$330 a year in E, D is a better option.
_________________
Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch
Manager
Joined: 09 Nov 2016
Posts: 53
Location: India
Re: Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Dec 2017, 03:16
1
1
Hello Verbal Experts,

The OA here is D. But, I am not convinced with it.

The idiom used here is X instead of Y, where X and Y both must be parallel.

Here in this option: to contribute \$330 a year toward the cost of higher education, instead of the \$7 per year required previously
X=\$330 a year
Y=the \$7 per year

Is the word 'the' before \$7 creating a problem and violating parallelism?

Please let me know.

Re: Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a   [#permalink] 26 Dec 2017, 03:16

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 53 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Most of Portugal's 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne