VeritasPrepKarishma
but isn't the red car a complex noun? formed by an adjective + noun?
so is in this question - 7 is adjective, dollars is noun, previously 7 - makes sense, no?
mvictor
VeritasPrepKarishma
mvictor
I could easily eliminate A, B, and E..and between C and D, I picked C.
7$ -> seven is an adjective - previously modifies the adjective, no? i understand that it is not explicitly written in this form..but in D "instead of" made me think twice whether it is correct...
$7 is a thing and hence is a noun. Just like 'red car' is a thing.
So the use of previously (an adverb) is wrong here.
Yes, correct. So think about this:
Will you say "The beautiful red car is ... " or "The beautifully red car is ..."
The point is that the entire "$7" acts as a noun and you need an adjective to modify it, not an adverb.
VeritasPrepKarishma... if we mean that the red colour is beautiful, we must use the adverb "beautifully", since it modifies the adjective "red". However if we mean that the car is beautiful, we must use adjective "beautiful" since it modifies the noun "car".
Consider a situation: The colour of the car in my opinion is not red, but someone else says that it is red. Hence I make the following statement:
I purchased the supposedly red car.
The statement would be grammatically correct. Isn't it?
Similarly, if the intent above is to modify the adjective "7", not the noun "dollar", I tend to agree with the logic of
mvictor. Nonetheless, as you said, I do agree that $7 can be considered as one object here and hence the adjective "previous" would be appropriate. Yet one could also say "previously 7 dollar," isn't it?
The price rose from previously 7 dollar to 10 dollar........... Is this sentence wrong?