Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 20:53 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 20:53
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
raghavs
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 28 Dec 2010
Posts: 96
Own Kudos:
1,093
 [247]
Given Kudos: 7
WE 1: 4 years in IT
Posts: 96
Kudos: 1,093
 [247]
18
Kudos
Add Kudos
228
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
 [106]
77
Kudos
Add Kudos
28
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,417
 [61]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,417
 [61]
46
Kudos
Add Kudos
14
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
anairamitch1804
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Last visit: 20 Apr 2019
Posts: 506
Own Kudos:
3,564
 [22]
Given Kudos: 877
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE:Education (Education)
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
Posts: 506
Kudos: 3,564
 [22]
18
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The 2/3 split here is right at the start of the underlined portion: do we need "comes" or "come"? The subject is "most of the purported health benefits," so we need the plural form "come".
We can eliminate E for using the pronoun "they," which could refer to antioxidants, compounds, or health benefits.

D uses parallel construction correctly:
"compounds that (are also found...) and that (inhibit the formation...)"
C does not use parallel form.
Look at choice C in its entirety:

Most of the purported health benefits of tea come from antioxidants--compounds also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C, and inhibit the formation of plaque along the body's blood vessels.

"And" must connect like forms. Here, we see "and inhibit," so the "and" must be linking a preceding verb to "inhibit." The only preceding verb is "come." So we get the following: Most of the purported health benefits of tea come from anti-oxidants... and inhibit the formation of plaque. The purported health benefits inhibit the formation of plaque? That doesn't make any sense.

Contrast C with the logic and parallelism of D: compounds that are x and that inhibit y. Now the compounds are inhibiting the formation of plaque. This is logical.

"Found" in C is a participle that functions as an adjective modifying "compounds," whereas "inhibit" is a simple present tense verb of which "compounds" is the subject. (The construction "are found" contains the verb "are" + the participle "found." "And" can't be used to connect two different parts of speech.
(It's worth noting that "found" can also be a simple past tense verb. "Dave found a bug in his cereal." The compounds in the previous example are not the agents of the action in the way that Dave is here.)

D. come from antioxidants—compounds that are also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C and that
E. come from antioxidants—compounds also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C, and they

This is a problem that deals with the structure of the sentence. D is parallel "compounds that modifier and that modifier. E does not have a legit strcuture: "compounds modifier , and they clause
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,193
Own Kudos:
4,759
 [5]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,193
Kudos: 4,759
 [5]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dear Friends,

Here is a detailed explanation to this question-
raghavs
Most of the purported health benefits of tea comes from antioxidants—compounds also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C that inhibit the formation of plaque along the body’s blood vessels.


(A) comes from antioxidants—compounds also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C that

(B) comes from antioxidants—compounds that are also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C, and they

(C) come from antioxidants—compounds also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C, and

(D) come from antioxidants—compounds that are also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C and that

(E) come from antioxidants—compounds also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C, and they


Meaning is crucial to solving this problem:
Understanding the intended meaning is key to solving this question; the intended meaning of the crucial part of this sentence is that antioxidants are compounds that are also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C, and that inhibit the formation of plaque along the body’s blood vessels.

Concepts tested here: Subject-Verb Agreement + Meaning + Modifiers + Parallelism + Awkwardness/Redundancy

• Any elements linked by a conjunction ("and" in this case) must be parallel.

A: This answer choice incorrectly refers to the plural noun "benefits" with the singular verb "comes". Further, Option A alters the meaning of the sentence through the phrase "beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C" that"; the use of "that" to modify the noun phrase "beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C" incorrectly implies that beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C inhibit the formation of plaque along the body’s blood vessels; the intended meaning is that the compounds - antioxidants - inhibit the formation of plaque along the body’s blood vessels.

B: This answer choice incorrectly refers to the plural noun "benefits" with the singular verb "comes". Further, Option B uses the needlessly wordy clause "and they inhibit the formation of plaque along the body’s blood vessels", leading to awkwardness and redundancy.

C: This answer choice fails to maintain parallelism between the noun phrase "compounds also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C" and the verb phrase "inhibit the formation of plaque along the body’s blood vessels"; please remember, any elements linked by a conjunction ("and" in this case) must be parallel.

D: Correct. This answer choice correctly refers to the plural noun "benefits" with the plural verb "come". Further, Option D uses the phrase "that are also found...and that inhibit", conveying the intended meaning - that the compounds - antioxidants - inhibit the formation of plaque along the body’s blood vessels. Additionally, Option D maintains parallelism between "that are also found in beta carotene" and "that inhibit the formation of plaque along the body’s blood vessels". Besides, Option D is free of any awkwardness or redundancy.

E: This answer choice uses the needlessly wordy clause "and they inhibit the formation of plaque along the body’s blood vessels", leading to awkwardness and redundancy.

Hence, D is the best answer choice.

All the best!
Experts' Global Team
General Discussion
User avatar
metallicafan
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Last visit: 26 Aug 2020
Posts: 759
Own Kudos:
4,406
 [3]
Given Kudos: 109
Status:2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Location: Peru
Concentration: Finance, SMEs, Developing countries, Public sector and non profit organizations
Schools:Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
GPA: 4.0
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Posts: 759
Kudos: 4,406
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
+1 D

"compounds also found..." is a phrase. I think that you cannot mix it with a clause when you introduce the verb "inhibit". You need something to do it; in this case a relative clause (THAT) is used to introduce the verb "inhibit".
User avatar
metallicafan
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Last visit: 26 Aug 2020
Posts: 759
Own Kudos:
4,406
 [1]
Given Kudos: 109
Status:2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Location: Peru
Concentration: Finance, SMEs, Developing countries, Public sector and non profit organizations
Schools:Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
GPA: 4.0
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Posts: 759
Kudos: 4,406
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh
What is wrong with C?

When fully expanded C will read:

Most of the purported health benefits of tea come from antioxidants—compounds also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C, and inhibit the formation of plaque along the body’s blood vessels.

The subject of the first part is - most (of the health benefits)- and the verb is – come -. By default, the subject of the second part is -( most ) of the health benefits -and its verb – Inhibit.

You can see the distortion of the meaning that it is the purported health benefits that inhibit plaque rather then the anti-oxidants. This is why C is not the right choice.

In E, the pronoun they may refer to the health benefits since subject rightly takes priority over any other noun that is placed nearer than the subject, per se.

Are you sure? I think that the dash ( - ) separates the main clause from the phrase "compounds also found...". I think that the problem is not subject-verb agreement.
Your thoughts please.
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,417
 [4]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,417
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The dash (-) is a parenthetical sign (akin to a colon ) that describes the antioxidants, .
- compounds also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C,. This is an feature of the sentence and the text will maintain the original meaning, even if the parenthetical contents are removed. All the same, the subject remains - most. -

My intent is to point out the distortion of the meaning that it is the purported health benefits that inhibit plaque rather than the anti-oxidants.

This is why C is not the right choice.

But I never said anything about S-V agreement. Have I been misunderstood?
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [2]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh
What is wrong with C?

When fully expanded C will read:

Most of the purported health benefits of tea come from antioxidants—compounds also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C, and inhibit the formation of plaque along the body’s blood vessels.

The subject of the first part is - most (of the health benefits)- and the verb is – come -. By default, the subject of the second part is -( most ) of the health benefits -and its verb – Inhibit.

You can see the distortion of the meaning that it is the purported health benefits that inhibit plaque rather then the anti-oxidants. This is why C is not the right choice.

In E, the pronoun they may refer to the health benefits since subject rightly takes priority over any other noun that is placed nearer than the subject, per se.

Hmm…as per your suggestion, substituting "-" for a ":" in C would read:

Most of the purported health benefits of tea come from antioxidants: compounds also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C, and inhibit the formation of plaque along the bodys blood vessels.

Are you saying that compounds modifies antioxidants, while inhibit modifies Most of the purported health benefits?

I would strongly agree with metallicafan that phrases and clauses cannot be parallel and hence, C is not correct.
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,417
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
@EducationAisle: I never said C is the correct answer. I am also saying C is not the correct answer.
Secondly, inhibit is the verb of the second part of the compound clause and not a modifier.

In addition, IMO. metallicafan discussed only S-V agreement and not modification or parallelism. I also never said clauses and phrases have to be parallel.

Incidentally, what will be the subject of the second clause? Unless the subject of the first clause can also act a the subject of the second clause, we can not afford to drop it. If you mean to say that the subject in the second place is antioxidants or compounds, then it has to be mentioned per se verbatim. Otherwise it is a grammatical error IMO .

Still I want to know, whether I have been misunderstood.
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
3,579
 [1]
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh
@EducationAisle: I never said C is the correct answer. I am also saying C is not the correct answer.
Secondly, inhibit is the verb of the second part of the compound clause and not a modifier.

In addition, IMO. metallicafan discussed only S-V agreement and not modification or parallelism. I also never said clauses and phrases have to be parallel.

Incidentally, what will be the subject of the second clause? Unless the subject of the first clause can also act a the subject of the second clause, we can not afford to drop it. If you mean to say that the subject in the second place is antioxidants or compounds, then it has to be mentioned per se verbatim. Otherwise it is a grammatical error IMO .

Still I want to know, whether I have been misunderstood.

Hi!! The endeavor here is to figure out ‘why’ C is wrong. C would read:

Most of the purported health benefits of tea come from antioxidants- compounds also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C, and inhibit the formation of plaque along the body’s blood vessels

If instead of ‘-‘, we had a comma, then the sentence would read:

Most of the purported health benefits of tea come from antioxidants, compounds also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C, and inhibit the formation of plaque along the body’s blood vessels

In this case, 'compounds….vitamin C' would be a non-essential modifier and so, 'inhibit the formation…' would describe Most of the purported health benefits (and is hence, logically incorrect).

However, since in the actual sentence, we have ‘-‘ and not comma, we are wondering if 'inhibit the formation…' still describes Most of the purported health benefits.

p.s. Modifiers are not a ‘part of speech’ but an ‘umbrella category’, if you will. Perhaps you would be aware that adjectives, adverbs and all adjective and adverb phrases fall into this ‘category’ of modifiers.
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,417
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
@EducationAisleh: 1.I am saying that C is wrong. Are you saying that C is right?
2. According to your averment, because a comma is absent and only a hyphen is there, the word “inhibit” will be verbing the antioxidants.
3. In other words, IYO, the use of comma would turn the sentence illogical while the use of a hyphen renders it logical. Is my understanding right? Then, if the verb “inhibit” is referring to the antioxidants- compounds also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C ( here found is a participle ) and inhibit ( inhibit is a verb), the paramount question is whether we can we have a participle on one side of the coordinating conjunction and a present tense verb on the other side. This is a grammatical blunder, because a coordinating conjunction such as “and” will conjunct only equal things. If indeed the antioxidants are acting as the subject of inhibit, then the right structure should be: the antioxidants- compounds also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C and inhibiting the formation (here both found and inhibiting are participles)

IMO, the plural verb “inhibit” is parallel to the verb “come” in the earlier portion of the sentence and thus renders the whole logic a fallacy.
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Not really sure what 'bluder' you are referring to. For example, following is a perfectly valid sentence:

US always participates in Olympics and has often emerged at the top in Olympics.

First clause is Present tense, the second (after 'and') uses Past Participle 'emerged'.
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,417
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Has often emerged is the present perfect tense using the past participle form of the verb emerge. (How else can one create a perfect tense)?

But please look at the problem in your example. On the one hand, the first part says that the US always participates in the Olympics( meaning that it participated in the past , participates in the present and will also participate in the future- a routine phenomenon) while the second part says that (the US) has often emerged at the top in Olympics. This means that it emerged at the top in Olympics in the past, and has emerged in the present. By using the present perfect, it is not clear whether the US will continue to do so in the future. If you have to include the future into the scheme, then you have to say: The US always participates in Olympics and emerges often at the top in Olympics. If you still think that your example is a perfectly valid one, in spite of using the perfect tense, I am none to stop you.
User avatar
EducationAisle
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,891
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 159
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: ISB
Posts: 3,891
Kudos: 3,579
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
daagh
If you have to include the future into the scheme, then you have to say:

The US always participates in Olympics and emerges often at the top in Olympics.


While we have definitely digressed from the original topic, this example definitely does not mean that US will 'continue to win' in future as well.
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,417
 [1]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,417
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
EducationAisle: IMO, the use of the present tense emerges does indicate that it will continue to do so in the future. When we say, "The Sun rises in the east", we do not just mean that it rises only as of now but also in the future. When we say Tom goes for jogging every morning, it means that he went in the past, he goes at present and will continue to go in the future.

If you think otherwise, you are welcome. But before that, pl. have a look at the link below

https://www.learnenglish.de/grammar/tensesimpresfut.htm
User avatar
sivasanjeev
Joined: 16 Jan 2013
Last visit: 22 Dec 2014
Posts: 116
Own Kudos:
1,604
 [2]
Given Kudos: 56
Posts: 116
Kudos: 1,604
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My two cents. For someone who wishes to find the issue in these options.

Rule 1 :
And is used as a co-ordinating conjunction to join two independent clauses (may be related in ideas)
Construction 1: clause 1 + comma + and + clause 2

Rule 2 :
And is used for connecting two or more items in a series. While connecting two items, we need not use a comma, but while connecting more than two items, we need to use the comma separator.

Construction 2: entity 1 + and + entity 2
Ex: My puppy has too much hair and too many fleas.

Construction 3: entity 1, entity 2, and entity 3
Ex: I love orange, mangoes, and pineapples.
avatar
abhasjha
Joined: 07 Jul 2010
Last visit: 25 May 2024
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
104
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 16
Kudos: 104
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The 2/3 split here is right at the start of the underlined portion: do we need "comes" or "come"? The subject is "most of the purported health benefits," so we need the plural form "come".

We can eliminate E for using the pronoun "they," which could refer to antioxidants, compounds, or health benefits.

D uses parallel construction correctly:

"compounds that (are also found...) and that (inhibit the formation...)"

C does not use parallel form.
avatar
axel2303
Joined: 05 Oct 2015
Last visit: 09 Jan 2016
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Posts: 3
Kudos: 3
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. comes from antioxidants—compounds also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C that
B. comes from antioxidants—compounds that are also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C, and they

A&B out comes should be plural

C. come from antioxidants—compounds also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C, and ', and' is incorrect
D. come from antioxidants—compounds that are also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C and that
E. come from antioxidants—compounds also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C, and they ', and they' is incorrect
avatar
gmatify17
Joined: 22 Sep 2017
Last visit: 02 Oct 2020
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
16
 [4]
Given Kudos: 15
Posts: 15
Kudos: 16
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
[quote="souvik101990"]

Verbal Question of The Day: Day 167: Sentence Correction


Subscribe to GMAT Question of the Day: E-mail | RSS
For All QOTD Questions Click Here

Most of the purported health benefits of tea comes from antioxidants—compounds also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C that inhibit the formation of plaque along the body’s blood vessels.

(A) comes from antioxidants—compounds also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C that

(B) comes from antioxidants—compounds that are also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C, and they

(C) come from antioxidants—compounds also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C, and

(D) come from antioxidants—compounds that are also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C and that

(E) come from antioxidants—compounds also found in beta carotene, vitamin E, and vitamin C, and they


ANSWER OPTION D


OPTION A-Subject Verb Agreement Problem----(BEnefits-come) is right and not benefits-comes, which is wrong.
OPTION B-Subject Verb Agreement Problem----(BEnefits-come) is right and not benefits-comes, which is wrong.
OPTION C-Sub-Verb agreement rectified. Parallelism issue-compounds also found and inhibit not matching.
OPTION D-Sub-Verb agreement rectified.PArallelism issue solved-compounds that are also found and compounds that inhibit.(Relative pronoun used correctly )
OPTION E-They is referring to whom???not clear
 1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts