GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 15 Jun 2019, 21:57

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Most scholars agree that King Alfred (A.D 849 - 899) personally

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 05 Jan 2014
Posts: 69
Location: India
GMAT 1: 610 Q47 V26
GPA: 3.76
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Most scholars agree that King Alfred (A.D 849 - 899) personally  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Nov 2018, 07:33
Quote:
Option B is Correct. The passage's third and fourth sentences question the plausibility of the historian's assumption that no one but Alfred would have been likely to write a text whose language has more similarities to than differences from the language in Alfred's translations.


How can this be an assumption? It has been clearly stated in passage as premise :- "One historian contends that Alfred also personally penned his own law code"

GMATNinjaTwo abhimahna Can you please help?

Thanks.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Posts: 416
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GPA: 2.61
WE: Management Consulting (Consulting)
CAT Tests
Most scholars agree that King Alfred (A.D 849 - 899) personally  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Dec 2018, 22:03
A lot of the complexity of this CR (RC hybrid really lol) is in the language used.

Conclusion: It is risky to assume that linguistic similarities point to common authorship
Strength: relatively strong given the conclusion isn't absolute
Premise: Someone should expect linguistic similarities between texts when those texts are written in the same time, language and region
Supporting premise/ sub-conclusion by other author: one historian contends that Alf personally penned (Wrote) his own law code because the linguistic similarities between alfred's translations of the latin texts and law code outweigh the linguistic differences
Supporting premise: Apart from Alfreds translations + Law code there are only two other extant (existent) works from the same dialect and milieu
Supporting premise: most scholars agree that Alf translated a number of texts himself

(A) Providing examples that underscore another argument's conclusion.
Underscore means "emphasise" - underscore sounds like you're speaking down to something when in fact you are emphasising it. The argument isn't emphasisting the sub-conclusion it is saying the opposite

(B) questioning the plausibility of an assumption on which another argument depends.
Yes - By stating "its risky to assume that X leads to common authorship" the author is questioning or saying not to follow the sub-conclusion blindly

(c) showing that a principle if generally applied would have anomalous consequences.
No - The author is questioning the conclusion and principles applied by other scholars/the historian. He isn't saying that applying this principle would lead to exceptional consequences.

(D) showing that the premises of another argument are mutually inconsistent.
This is the runner up answer that most people will likely get stung by because the author is questioning the premises supporting another conclusion (the sub-conclusion), but he isn't saying they're inconsistent. In fact they are logical, but more evidence would be needed to link the premises to the sub-conclusion.

(E) using argument by analogy to undermine a principle implicit in another argument.
The author does undermine a principle, but he isn't arguing by anaology. Warped answer --> Eliminate
_________________
Goal: Q49, V41

+1 Kudos if you like my post pls!
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 08 Jul 2017
Posts: 33
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V29
Re: Most scholars agree that King Alfred (A.D 849 - 899) personally  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jun 2019, 22:01
AnubhavK wrote:
Answer choice 'B' is correct -

The passage's third and fourth sentences question the plausibility of the historian's assumption that no one but Alfred would have been likely to write a text whose language has more similarities to than differences from the language in Alfred's translations


could you pleasw tell me the plausibility 'means
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Most scholars agree that King Alfred (A.D 849 - 899) personally   [#permalink] 14 Jun 2019, 22:01

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 23 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Most scholars agree that King Alfred (A.D 849 - 899) personally

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne