GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 17 Dec 2018, 00:13

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
  • 10 Keys to nail DS and CR questions

     December 17, 2018

     December 17, 2018

     06:00 PM PST

     07:00 PM PST

    Join our live webinar and learn how to approach Data Sufficiency and Critical Reasoning problems, how to identify the best way to solve each question and what most people do wrong.
  • R1 Admission Decisions: Estimated Decision Timelines and Chat Links for Major BSchools

     December 17, 2018

     December 17, 2018

     10:00 PM PST

     11:00 PM PST

    From Dec 5th onward, American programs will start releasing R1 decisions. Chat Rooms: We have also assigned chat rooms for every school so that applicants can stay in touch and exchange information/update during decision period.

Mr. Lawson: We should adopt a national family policy that includes leg

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 May 2009
Posts: 23
Mr. Lawson: We should adopt a national family policy that includes leg  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 17 Nov 2018, 07:30
1
15
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

57% (01:27) correct 43% (01:33) wrong based on 633 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Project CR Butler:Day 12:Critical Reasoning (CR2)


For all CR butler Questions Click Here

Mr. Lawson: We should adopt a national family policy that includes legislation requiring employers to provide paid parental leave and establishing government-sponsored day care. Such laws would decrease the stress levels of employees who have responsibility for small children. Thus, such laws would lead to happier, better-adjusted families.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the conclusion above?


(A) An employee’s high stress level can be a cause of unhappiness and poor adjustment for his or her family.

(B) People who have responsibility for small children and who work outside the home have higher stress levels than those who do not.

(C) The goal of a national family policy is to lower the stress levels of parents.

(D) Any national family policy that is adopted would include legislation requiring employers to provide paid parental leave and establishing government-sponsored day care.

(E) Most children who have been cared for in daycare centers are happy and well adjusted.

Originally posted by apramanik on 17 Aug 2009, 08:34.
Last edited by gmat1393 on 17 Nov 2018, 07:30, edited 1 time in total.
Updated
Most Helpful Community Reply
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2008
Posts: 202
Re: Mr. Lawson: We should adopt a national family policy that includes leg  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Aug 2009, 01:02
6
2
[quote="gurpreet07"]Mr. Lawson: We should adopt a national family policy that includes legislation requiring employers to provide paid parental leave and establishing government-sponsored day care. Such laws would decrease the stress levels of employees who have responsibility for small children. Thus, such laws would lead to happier, better-adjusted families.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the conclusion above?
(A) An employee’s high stress level can be a cause of unhappiness and poor adjustment for his or her family.
(B) People who have responsibility for small children and who work outside the home have higher stress levels than those who do not.
(C) The goal of a national family policy is to lower the stress levels of parents.
(D) Any national family policy that is adopted would include legislation requiring employers to provide paid parental leave and establishing government-sponsored day care.
(E) Most children who have been cared for in daycare centers are happy and well adjusted.

Premise 1: We should adopt a national family policy that includes legislation requiring employers to provide paid parental leave and establishing government-sponsored day care.
Premise 2: Such laws would decrease the stress levels of employees who have responsibility for small children.
Conclusion :Such laws would lead to happier, better-adjusted families.

There is a gap in the stem. Laws lead to happier better adjusted families but why ? Why : Because Such laws would decrease the stress levels of employees. Then how can happier better adjusted families can be established

An employee’s high stress level can be a cause of unhappiness and poor adjustment for his or her family.

If the stress level is minimal happy families can be established.
B is tempting but irrevelant because question does not care about productivity or anything else it just cares about national a national family policy and happier families.
_________________

Please give kudos if you enjoy the explanations that I have given. Thanks :)

General Discussion
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 355
Re: Mr. Lawson: We should adopt a national family policy that includes leg  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Aug 2009, 09:23
1
Mr. Lawson: We should adopt a national family policy that includes legislation requiring employers to provide paid parental leave and establishing government-sponsored day care. Such laws would decrease the stress levels of employees who have responsibility for small children. Thus, such laws would lead to happier, better-adjusted families.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the conclusion above?
(A) An employee’s high stress level can be a cause of unhappiness and poor adjustment for his or her family.
(B) People who have responsibility for small children and who work outside the home have higher stress levels than those who do not.
(C) The goal of a national family policy is to lower the stress levels of parents.
(D) Any national family policy that is adopted would include legislation requiring employers to provide paid parental leave and establishing government-sponsored day care.
(E) Most children who have been cared for in daycare centers are happy and well adjusted.

Answer is A : If an employee unhappiness and poor adjustment is caused due to high stress levels then the national policy would help them i.e employers will be required to provide paid parental leave and establishing government-sponsored day care.

I mean to say that this assumption is strengtening the conclusion

B is wrong because the argument is talking about the employee's who have responsibility for small children and not about parents who dont have any responsibility. The option is actualy out of scope.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Posts: 240
Re: Mr. Lawson: We should adopt a national family policy that includes leg  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Aug 2009, 07:14
strengthen questions must strengthen the conclusion of the arguement, here conclusion is
Thus, such laws would lead to happier, better-adjusted families. what laws? Such laws would decrease the stress levels of employees who have responsibility for small children

decrease stress --> happier

A states high stress level--> unhappiness due to poor adujstment , so reduce stress--> happiness strengthens conclusion

B is so close, but when you consider the conclusion of the argument, B doesnt state about anything that leads to happieness..
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 May 2009
Posts: 196
Re: Mr. Lawson: We should adopt a national family policy that includes leg  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Aug 2009, 07:20
1
B is out of scope....when asked to strengthen the argument, we can being in new information, but not new to such an extent that it is out of scope. B exactly does this.

It compares people who work and people who do not, while the argument is purely concerned about working people.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Apr 2013
Posts: 126
Re: Mr. Lawson: We should adopt a national family policy that includes leg  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jun 2013, 18:05
"A states high stress level--> unhappiness due to poor adujstment , so reduce stress--> happiness strengthens conclusion"

I dont agree with above statement. Contrapositive of above statements is -

Not unhappy - > not high stress which says happy -> low stress but not low stress -> happy
_________________

Maadhu

MGMAT1 - 540 ( Trying to improve )

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1720
Concentration: Finance
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Mr. Lawson: We should adopt a national family policy that includes leg  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Oct 2013, 10:53
apramanik wrote:
Mr. Lawson: We should adopt a national family policy that includes legislation requiring employers to provide paid parental leave and establishing government-sponsored day care. Such laws would decrease the stress levels of employees who have responsibility for small children. Thus, such laws would lead to happier, better-adjusted families.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the conclusion above?
(A) An employee’s high stress level can be a cause of unhappiness and poor adjustment for his or her family.
(B) People who have responsibility for small children and who work outside the home have higher stress levels than those who do not.
(C) The goal of a national family policy is to lower the stress levels of parents.
(D) Any national family policy that is adopted would include legislation requiring employers to provide paid parental leave and establishing government-sponsored day care.
(E) Most children who have been cared for in daycare centers are happy and well adjusted.


Why B not Ans ?


I think A is the correct answer here. B is not correct because it doesn't mention anything about people who work outside home. So this is out of scope
Hope it helps
Cheers
J :)
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1720
Concentration: Finance
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Mr. Lawson: We should adopt a national family policy that includes leg  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Oct 2013, 12:46
jlgdr wrote:
apramanik wrote:
Mr. Lawson: We should adopt a national family policy that includes legislation requiring employers to provide paid parental leave and establishing government-sponsored day care. Such laws would decrease the stress levels of employees who have responsibility for small children. Thus, such laws would lead to happier, better-adjusted families.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the conclusion above?
(A) An employee’s high stress level can be a cause of unhappiness and poor adjustment for his or her family.
(B) People who have responsibility for small children and who work outside the home have higher stress levels than those who do not.
(C) The goal of a national family policy is to lower the stress levels of parents.
(D) Any national family policy that is adopted would include legislation requiring employers to provide paid parental leave and establishing government-sponsored day care.
(E) Most children who have been cared for in daycare centers are happy and well adjusted.


Why B not Ans ?


I think A is the correct answer here. B is not correct because it doesn't mention anything about people who work outside home. So this is out of scope
Hope it helps
Cheers
J :)


Are we all on the same page with A as correct answer?
Let me know what the OA is just to be sure
Cheers
J :)
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 06 Jun 2013
Posts: 150
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Tuck
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.6
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Premium Member
Re: Mr. Lawson: We should adopt a national family policy that includes leg  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Oct 2015, 23:27
A is the answer.

we need to consider employee as employer is mentioned.

people who work outside may include employee and businessman as well, who are not employed by any employer.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 05 May 2017
Posts: 13
Re: Mr. Lawson: We should adopt a national family policy that includes leg  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 May 2017, 00:45
D,E are eliminated. B is out too because it has nothing to do with either national law or happiness. C just repeats the conclusion of the argument. D is too extreme; "any". E is OFS
CR Forum Moderator
avatar
P
Joined: 25 Apr 2018
Posts: 358
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Mr. Lawson: We should adopt a national family policy that includes leg  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Nov 2018, 07:29
+1 Kudos to the posts containing explanations for all the choices.
_________________

Please give kudos if you found my posts helpful!

Project CR Butler - 2 CR's everyday

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 24 Mar 2018
Posts: 170
CAT Tests
Re: Mr. Lawson: We should adopt a national family policy that includes leg  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Dec 2018, 22:53
jlgdr
I considered First sentence as the conclusion how is that premise ?
VP
VP
User avatar
D
Joined: 09 Mar 2016
Posts: 1241
Mr. Lawson: We should adopt a national family policy that includes leg  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Dec 2018, 02:13
Mr. Lawson: We should adopt a national family policy that includes legislation requiring employers to provide paid parental leave and establishing government-sponsored day care. Such laws would decrease the stress levels of employees who have responsibility for small children. Thus, such laws would lead to happier, better-adjusted families.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the conclusion above?



So a proponent claims that national family policy should be enacted. This law will reduce stress among employees who have children. What can be said in favor of this claim to strenghthen it ?



(A) An employee’s high stress level can be a cause of unhappiness and poor adjustment for his or her family. (without too much thinking. keep it) After eliminating rest of options. this option looks the most logical, since our primary concern is to reduce levels of stress among employees, this in turn will have positive effect on their families.

(B) People who have responsibility for small children and who work outside the home have higher stress levels than those who do not. ( We are not concerned with comparison of employees who work outside of home vs home based workers. Nowhere is mentioned. out of scope.


(C) The goal of a national family policy is to lower the stress levels of parents. ( it is already mentioned in the passage. eliminate)

(D) Any national family policy that is adopted would include legislation requiring employers to provide paid parental leave and establishing government-sponsored day care. ( neutral. doesnt strengthen at all. eliminate.

(E) Most children who have been cared for in daycare centers are happy and well adjusted. ( okay so what ? We are concerned with reduction of stress of employees) eliminate.
GMAT Club Bot
Mr. Lawson: We should adopt a national family policy that includes leg &nbs [#permalink] 15 Dec 2018, 02:13
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Mr. Lawson: We should adopt a national family policy that includes leg

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.