GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 13 Dec 2018, 01:21

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
  • The winning strategy for 700+ on the GMAT

     December 13, 2018

     December 13, 2018

     08:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    What people who reach the high 700's do differently? We're going to share insights, tips and strategies from data we collected on over 50,000 students who used examPAL.
  • GMATbuster's Weekly GMAT Quant Quiz, Tomorrow, Saturday at 9 AM PST

     December 14, 2018

     December 14, 2018

     09:00 AM PST

     10:00 AM PST

    10 Questions will be posted on the forum and we will post a reply in this Topic with a link to each question. There are prizes for the winners.

Muriel: I admire Favilla’s novels, but she does not deserve to be cons

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

BSchool Forum Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: Transforming Educational System
Joined: 21 Sep 2016
Posts: 459
Location: India
Concentration: Nonprofit, Social Entrepreneurship
Schools: Boston U '20 (A)
WE: Education (Non-Profit and Government)
Reviews Badge
Muriel: I admire Favilla’s novels, but she does not deserve to be cons  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Oct 2017, 23:42
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

72% (01:24) correct 28% (01:29) wrong based on 113 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Muriel: I admire Favilla’s novels, but she does not deserve to be considered a great writer. The point is that, no matter how distinctive her style may be, her subject matter is simply not varied enough.

John: I think you are wrong to use that criterion. A great writer does not need any diversity in subject matter; however, a great writer must at least have the ability to explore a particular theme deeply.

John’s statements commit him to which one of the following position?


(A) Even if the subject matter in Favilla’s writings is not particularly varied, she should not thereby be excluded from being considered a great writer.

(B) Even if Favilla cannot explore any particular theme deeply in her writings, she should not thereby be excluded from being considered a great writer.

(C) If Favilla has explored some particular theme exceptionally deeply in her writings, she deserves to be considered a great writer.

(D) If the subject matter in Favilla’s writings were exceptionally varied, she would not deserve to be considered a great writer.

(E) If Favilla’s writings show no evidence of a distinctive style, she does not deserve to be considered a great writer.

_________________

Canadian Bschools: Detailed comparison
Resume Guides

If you found my post helpful, kindly press "+1 Kudos" to appreciate :) ..TIA

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
P
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Posts: 250
GPA: 3.57
Reviews Badge
Re: Muriel: I admire Favilla’s novels, but she does not deserve to be cons  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Oct 2017, 17:51
vivek6199 wrote:
Muriel: I admire Favilla’s novels, but she does not deserve to be considered a great writer. The point is that, no matter how distinctive her style may be, her subject matter is simply not varied enough.

John: I think you are wrong to use that criterion. A great writer does not need any diversity in subject matter; however, a great writer must at least have the ability to explore a particular theme deeply.

John’s statements commit him to which one of the following position?
(A) Even if the subject matter in Favilla’s writings is not particularly varied, she should not thereby be excluded from being considered a great writer.
(B) Even if Favilla cannot explore any particular theme deeply in her writings, she should not thereby be excluded from being considered a great writer.
(C) If Favilla has explored some particular theme exceptionally deeply in her writings, she deserves to be considered a great writer.
(D) If the subject matter in Favilla’s writings were exceptionally varied, she would not deserve to be considered a great writer.
(E) If Favilla’s writings show no evidence of a distinctive style, she does not deserve to be considered a great writer.


It should be C.

(A) Even if the subject matter in Favilla’s writings is not particularly varied, she should not thereby be excluded from being considered a great writer. - This would be the best of the rest choice. Muriel stated Favilla's writing is not varied enough. The key aspect missing here is John's assertion that an author must have the ability to explore a subject deeply.

(B) Even if Favilla cannot explore any particular theme deeply in her writings, she should not thereby be excluded from being considered a great writer. - It goes against John's point of view.

(C) If Favilla has explored some particular theme exceptionally deeply in her writings, she deserves to be considered a great writer. - Favilla meets the minimum criteria set for a great author in John's mind. - Correct.

(D) If the subject matter in Favilla’s writings were exceptionally varied, she would not deserve to be considered a great writer. - Out of Scope. Nowhere does John say that great authors do not vary their writing. Muriel is against calling Favilla a great author and John is against that assertion, i.e. he is 'for' classifying Muriel as a great author.

(E) If Favilla’s writings show no evidence of a distinctive style, she does not deserve to be considered a great writer. - Muriel is against calling Favilla a great author and John's position is opposite of that. This is straying way out of scope.
_________________

Please hit Kudos if this post helped you inch closer to your GMAT goal.
Procrastination is the termite constantly trying to eat your GMAT tree from the inside.
There is one fix to every problem, working harder!

GMAT Club Bot
Re: Muriel: I admire Favilla’s novels, but she does not deserve to be cons &nbs [#permalink] 17 Oct 2017, 17:51
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Muriel: I admire Favilla’s novels, but she does not deserve to be cons

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.