Kryzak, I'm sure you'll have some good options, although I don't know if UCLA is known for handing out big money.
Strategery
Maybe I'm in the minority, but unless Darden blows me away (through the campus visit and/or scholarships), UNC is my target school despite being lower-ranked in most publications.
Well, you didn't give any reasons for your assertion there, but I can tell you with absolute certainty that you will have better job opportunities at Darden than at UNC. I'm not denigrating UNC, but there's just no comparison. I can also say with a fair amount of certainty that Darden has a stronger, more tightly knit group of alumni and is known to have one of the strongest student communities of any business school. Also, given the fact that Darden has a substantially larger endowment (about 3 times bigger than UNC), you can expect the Darden brand to remain strong going forward.
For anyone interested, Darden's endowment is also bigger than those at Berkeley, UCLA, Cornell, Tuck and pretty much every other elite school (I think Yale is the exception). Darden is a smaller school, and so it's endowment per student is much higher. Not surprisingly, all of the ultra-elites have bigger endowments - money matters in this game because it allows schools to bring in top professors, offer scholarships to top students and fund projects and learning centers. What's a business school these days without a breathtaking facility? A fat endowment means that the schools will be able to adjust to changes and remain strong in the future.
Strategery didn't offer any support for his statement, and it's the type of comment that really sounds crazy without anything to back it up. If you love Chapel Hill, i understand that; but there's really not much doubt which school is a better investment for your time and money.
Pelihu failed to mention the overriding factor...do you really want to be a Tar Hole instead of a Wahoo?