Last visit was: 05 Sep 2026, 09:02 It is currently 05 Sep 2026, 09:02
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
RenB
Joined: 13 Jul 2022
Last visit: 06 Jul 2026
Posts: 388
Own Kudos:
1,630
 [55]
Given Kudos: 302
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Nonprofit
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q90 V84 DI82
GPA: 3.74
WE:Corporate Finance (Consulting)
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
53
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
gmatophobia
User avatar
Quant Chat Moderator
Joined: 22 Dec 2016
Last visit: 30 Aug 2026
Posts: 3,174
Own Kudos:
12,321
 [5]
Given Kudos: 1,860
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
Posts: 3,174
Kudos: 12,321
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
HarshavardhanR
Joined: 16 Mar 2023
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 649
Own Kudos:
758
 [5]
Given Kudos: 99
Status:Independent GMAT Tutor
Affiliations: Ex - Director, Subject Matter Expertise at e-GMAT
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 649
Kudos: 758
 [5]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,150
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 111,330
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,150
Kudos: 839,304
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
RenB
Of the four-digit positive integers that are greater than 4000, how many have three digits that are equal to each other and one digit that is not equal to the other three?

A. 162
B. 215
C. 216
D. 240
E. 324

GMATNinja Video Solution:




General Discussion
User avatar
vedha0
Joined: 10 Jan 2023
Last visit: 17 Mar 2024
Posts: 120
Own Kudos:
128
 [1]
Given Kudos: 58
Posts: 120
Kudos: 128
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
2 cases. let 4 digit number be abcd i.e, 1000a+100b+10c+d where 0 <= b,c,d <= 9 and 1<= a <= 9

1. thousands digit is the equal digit.
now a has 6 possibilities - 4 to 9. among b,c,d - two are equal to a. the other digit has 9 possibilities (0 to 9 minus the digit that is a, since unequal). b,c,d has 2 equal elements and 1 unequal. arranging this will give 3 possibilities. so 6*(9*3) = 162

2. thousands digit is the unequal digit.
now a has 6 possibilities. b=c=d but not equal to a. so it has 9 possibilites. therefore 6*9 = 54. note that we have counted 4000 in this case. we need numbers greater than 4000. so minus 1. 53 possibilities.

thereofre total is 162+53 = 215 possibilities. answer is B
User avatar
sherlocked221B
Joined: 30 Jan 2024
Last visit: 23 Sep 2025
Posts: 90
Own Kudos:
79
 [1]
Given Kudos: 344
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q87 V80 DI78
GPA: 8.45
WE:Engineering (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q87 V80 DI78
Posts: 90
Kudos: 79
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
RenB
Of the four-digit positive integers that are greater than 4000, how many have three digits that are equal to each other and one digit that is not equal to the other three?

A. 162
B. 215
C. 216
D. 240
E. 324
­
Let's count from 4000 to 9999 including 4000, and then subtract 1 from the final result because we need to find numbers greater than 4000.

Out of the 4 digits, 3 digits are equal and other digit is not equal to these 3 digits, ruling out the case all 4 digits are equal.

Let's consider the first case: 4000 -> 4999,

For (4,0) combination -> we have the following 4 possibilities.

4000 | 4004 | 4044 | 4440 ---> 4 Possibilities

Similarly, for (4,1) -> (4,9) combinations; leaving out (4,4) combination. We have 4 Possibilities * 8 Other Combinations = 32 Possibilities.

Total for (4,0) , (4,1) , (4,2) , (4,3) , (4,5) , (4,6) ,(4,7) ,(4,8) ,(4,9) = 36 ways!

Now, for the total 4000 -> 9999,


We will have 6 cases - 4000 - 4999; 5000 - 5999; 6000-6999; 7000-7999; 8000-8999; 9000-9999 (6 cases)

We will have 36 Possibilities * 6 cases = 216 ways

Let's subtract 1, from 216 because we also considered 4000 as a possible number.

Final Answer = 216 - 1 = 215 ways!­
User avatar
Kinshook
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 04 Sep 2026
Posts: 6,129
Own Kudos:
6,089
 [1]
Given Kudos: 164
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 6,129
Kudos: 6,089
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
RenB
Of the four-digit positive integers that are greater than 4000, how many have three digits that are equal to each other and one digit that is not equal to the other three?
Case 1: 1st digit is different from other 3. 
Number of possibilities for first digit = 6    : {4,5,6,7,8,9}
Number of possibilities for other 3 digits = 9
Total cases = 6*9 = 54

Case 1: 1st digit is repeated 2 more times. 1 other digit is different from other 3. 
Number of possibilities for first digit = 6      : {4,5,6,7,8,9}
Number of possibilities for placement of these 3 digits = 3C2 = 3
Number of possibilities for chosing other digit = 9
Total cases = 6*3*9 = 162

We have to subtract the case of 4000 since it is not allowed. 

Of the four-digit positive integers that are greater than 4000, The number of integers that have three digits that are equal to each other and one digit that is not equal to the other three = 54 + 162 - 1 = 215

IMO B­
User avatar
ga821
Joined: 06 Jun 2021
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 74
Products:
Posts: 58
Kudos: 33
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How I did it, kindly correct if wrong-

first digit can be chosen in 6 ways (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9), the second and third digit in 1 way because it has to be a repeat of the first digit.
the last digit can be chosen in 9 ways (excluding the digit chosen in the first three digits)

now the other two repeating digits which are similar to the first one can be given positions in 3! ways

the only thing one has to keep in mind is it is greater than 4000 hence it becomes 6*9*3*2 - 1 = 215
User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 6,291
Own Kudos:
33,900
 [1]
Given Kudos: 716
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 6,291
Kudos: 33,900
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi ga821,

Your starting numbers are right: 6 ways for a thousands digit from {4,5,6,7,8,9} and 9 ways for the odd digit (any digit except the repeated one). The trouble is the arrangement factor and a missing case.

The overcount: don't arrange identical digits

When three of the digits are the same, you never rearrange them among themselves - swapping two identical digits gives you the same number. The only thing that actually moves is the single odd digit. So there's no 3! and no extra ×2 here; multiplying by 3*2 double-counts numbers that are literally identical.

Also, a quick arithmetic check: 6*9*3*2 = 324, so 324 - 1 = 323, not 215 - the formula as written doesn't land on the answer.

Why you actually need two separate cases

The ">4000" rule forces the thousands digit to be 4-9, and that constraint behaves differently depending on where the odd digit sits:

- Odd digit is NOT in the thousands place (thousands is part of the triple): 6 for the repeated digit × 9 for the odd digit × 3 positions for the odd digit among the last three slots = 162.
- Odd digit IS the thousands digit (last three are all the repeat): 6 for the thousands digit × 9 for the repeated digit × 1 (the other three slots are forced) = 54.

Total = 162 + 54 = 216, then subtract the single number 4000 - 215.

So the fix is: replace your ×3×2 with just "where does the one odd digit go," and add the case where that odd digit is the leading 4-9.

Lock in the identical-digit idea

How many distinct numbers use the digits 5, 5, 5, 7? It's not4! = 24. Just list them:

- 5557, 5575, 5755, 7555 - only 4.

You only ever decide where the odd digit goes - the identical 5's don't create new arrangements. That's exactly the overcount your extra factor introduced.

Answer: B

ga821
How I did it, kindly correct if wrong-

first digit can be chosen in 6 ways (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9), the second and third digit in 1 way because it has to be a repeat of the first digit.
the last digit can be chosen in 9 ways (excluding the digit chosen in the first three digits)

now the other two repeating digits which are similar to the first one can be given positions in 3! ways

the only thing one has to keep in mind is it is greater than 4000 hence it becomes 6*9*3*2 - 1 = 215
User avatar
ga821
Joined: 06 Jun 2021
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 74
Products:
Posts: 58
Kudos: 33
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
thank you so much, this really helped!
egmat
Hi ga821,

Your starting numbers are right: 6 ways for a thousands digit from {4,5,6,7,8,9} and 9 ways for the odd digit (any digit except the repeated one). The trouble is the arrangement factor and a missing case.

The overcount: don't arrange identical digits

When three of the digits are the same, you never rearrange them among themselves - swapping two identical digits gives you the same number. The only thing that actually moves is the single odd digit. So there's no 3! and no extra ×2 here; multiplying by 3*2 double-counts numbers that are literally identical.

Also, a quick arithmetic check: 6*9*3*2 = 324, so 324 - 1 = 323, not 215 - the formula as written doesn't land on the answer.

Why you actually need two separate cases

The ">4000" rule forces the thousands digit to be 4-9, and that constraint behaves differently depending on where the odd digit sits:

- Odd digit is NOT in the thousands place (thousands is part of the triple): 6 for the repeated digit × 9 for the odd digit × 3 positions for the odd digit among the last three slots = 162.
- Odd digit IS the thousands digit (last three are all the repeat): 6 for the thousands digit × 9 for the repeated digit × 1 (the other three slots are forced) = 54.

Total = 162 + 54 = 216, then subtract the single number 4000 - 215.

So the fix is: replace your ×3×2 with just "where does the one odd digit go," and add the case where that odd digit is the leading 4-9.

Lock in the identical-digit idea

How many distinct numbers use the digits 5, 5, 5, 7? It's not4! = 24. Just list them:

- 5557, 5575, 5755, 7555 - only 4.

You only ever decide where the odd digit goes - the identical 5's don't create new arrangements. That's exactly the overcount your extra factor introduced.

Answer: B


Moderator:
Math Expert
113150 posts