Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 21:50 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 21:50
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
tk1tez7777
Joined: 26 Apr 2013
Last visit: 05 Jun 2014
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
402
 [53]
Given Kudos: 2
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Nonprofit
GPA: 3.5
WE:Marketing (Telecommunications)
Posts: 39
Kudos: 402
 [53]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
49
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
pqhai
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Last visit: 26 Nov 2015
Posts: 867
Own Kudos:
8,883
 [22]
Given Kudos: 123
Location: United States
Posts: 867
Kudos: 8,883
 [22]
15
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
ankurgupta03
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Last visit: 07 Nov 2023
Posts: 1,372
Own Kudos:
1,849
 [2]
Given Kudos: 833
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.35
WE:Consulting (Computer Software)
Products:
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
Posts: 1,372
Kudos: 1,849
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
KanupriyaS
Joined: 15 Apr 2013
Last visit: 28 Dec 2013
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
Concentration: Human Resources, International Business
GMAT 1: 570 Q44 V25
GPA: 3
GMAT 1: 570 Q44 V25
Posts: 45
Kudos: 32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tk1tez7777
One complaint about recently developed “care” robots – robots designed to help care for elderly or sick patients in their home – is that they do not have the capacity for listening, expressing emotion, and tricking patients to think they can is unethical.

is that they do not have the capacity for listening, expressing emotion, and tricking patients to think they can is unethical
is that they do not have the capacity to listen, to express emotion, and to trick patients to think they can is unethical
is that they do not have the capacity for listening or expressing emotion, and tricking patients to think they can is unethical
is that they do not have the capacity to listen or express emotion, and tricking patients to think they can is unethical
is that they do not have the capacity to listen or express emotion, and tricking patients that they are doing this is unethical

It took me a while to figure this one out. I did it by elimination.

A. Incorrect. I feel "capacity to" is better suited here, gives a meaning that tricking is a part of complaint
B. Incorrect. Conveys that 'Complaint is that robot cannot trick', which is not right.
C. Incorrect. Same reason as A
D. Correct. Seems the most logical choice.
E. Incorrect. Wordy and awkward. 'that they are doing' is unnecessary.

Any feedback is appreciated. Although I got the correct answer still want to make sure I got it through the right logic.
User avatar
Nevernevergiveup
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Last visit: 20 Aug 2023
Posts: 1,008
Own Kudos:
3,016
 [3]
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 1,008
Kudos: 3,016
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Well pqhai nails it above. Here is the OE by Veritas prep

OE
Answer choices (A) and (B) contain the easiest errors – both relating to sentence construction. The second part of the clause following the dash is not a series in relation to “listening, expressing emotion” in (A) or “to listen, to express” in (B) The robots lack the capacity to/for these two things and then separately the sentence is saying that “tricking patients to think that they” can do these things is unethical. (C), (D) and (E) properly separate off the second part of the clause with a comma and “and” but only (D) has the proper structure to follow the infinitive “to listen or express”. When auxiliary verbs such as “can” are used to replace full verbs (here “listen or express”), they must be able to be logically followed by the structure that precedes it. In (C) it is incorrect to use “listening or expressing” and then say “tricking patients that they can LISTENING OR EXPRESSING is unethical” In (D), you have the proper “tricking patients that they can LISTEN OR EXPRESS emotion is unethical” For (E), you likewise cannot say that “they are doing LISTEN or EXPRESS emotion” Only (D) matches up the correct structures and is thus the correct answer.
User avatar
keats
Joined: 28 Nov 2014
Last visit: 08 Jun 2019
Posts: 739
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 86
Concentration: Strategy
GPA: 3.71
Products:
Posts: 739
Kudos: 1,361
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can any instructor/member explain how the meaning is incorrectly conveyed in option A (original sentence). I understand that the complaints w.r.t robots are two
- they do not have the capacity to listen or express emotion
and
- tricking the patients to think that these robots can listen or express is unethical
It'd be great if someone can talk about how this meaning is lost in option A and B.
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,393
Own Kudos:
15,523
 [3]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,393
Kudos: 15,523
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Keats
Can any instructor/member explain how the meaning is incorrectly conveyed in option A (original sentence). I understand that the complaints w.r.t robots are two
- they do not have the capacity to listen or express emotion
and
- tricking the patients to think that these robots can listen or express is unethical
It'd be great if someone can talk about how this meaning is lost in option A and B.

The second point you mentioned, tricking the patients is not a complaint about the robots, but a complaint about the people who promote these robots.

Options A and B imply that the robots do not have the capacity to trick the patients (listen, express and trick are in parallel)... this meaning is not intended.
Moreover in option A, the usage "capacity for..." is wrong.
avatar
vsvikas
Joined: 30 Jun 2016
Last visit: 20 Aug 2017
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 8
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sayantanc2k
Keats
Can any instructor/member explain how the meaning is incorrectly conveyed in option A (original sentence). I understand that the complaints w.r.t robots are two
- they do not have the capacity to listen or express emotion
and
- tricking the patients to think that these robots can listen or express is unethical
It'd be great if someone can talk about how this meaning is lost in option A and B.

The second point you mentioned, tricking the patients is not a complaint about the robots, but a complaint about the people who promote these robots.

Options A and B imply that the robots do not have the capacity to trick the patients (listen, express and trick are in parallel)... this meaning is not intended.
Moreover in option A, the usage "capacity for..." is wrong.
==========
i like D..but just get stuck with parallel structure..why not "to listen or TO express emotion
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,393
Own Kudos:
15,523
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,393
Kudos: 15,523
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vsvikas
sayantanc2k
Keats
Can any instructor/member explain how the meaning is incorrectly conveyed in option A (original sentence). I understand that the complaints w.r.t robots are two
- they do not have the capacity to listen or express emotion
and
- tricking the patients to think that these robots can listen or express is unethical
It'd be great if someone can talk about how this meaning is lost in option A and B.

The second point you mentioned, tricking the patients is not a complaint about the robots, but a complaint about the people who promote these robots.

Options A and B imply that the robots do not have the capacity to trick the patients (listen, express and trick are in parallel)... this meaning is not intended.
Moreover in option A, the usage "capacity for..." is wrong.
==========
i like D..but just get stuck with parallel structure..why not "to listen or TO express emotion

"To" is outside the parallel structure, hence it covers both - I presume you are aware of the "once out, twice in" thumb-rule.
(In this case "to listen or to express" would also be correct - in that case "to" would be inside the parallel structure.)
User avatar
ManSab
Joined: 03 May 2014
Last visit: 18 Jun 2020
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 91
Posts: 16
Kudos: 32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Isn't this sentence confusing? It begins with one complain and then lists two:
1)capacity to listen or express emotion
2)tricking patients to think they can is unethical...

very odd structure - haven't seen such sentences in official GMAT examples..
avatar
Valhalla
Joined: 26 Apr 2017
Last visit: 29 Nov 2022
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
146
 [3]
Given Kudos: 71
Posts: 39
Kudos: 146
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This is my approach,
Eliminate A, and B because the sentence contains 2 clauses/ separate ideas connected by 'and'- this is based on meaning - ie.
1. Complaint
2. Tricking

Eliminate E
Doing - progressive tense -meaning that they are currently doing something ie when you look at them they are doing the action

Decision point C and D
C capacity for
D capacity to

1. General rule to X is better than for X.
2. Try substitute "capacity" with "ability"
a. ability to = can - definite definition and appear numerous time in idiom from Manhattan Prep
b. ability for - may sounds right but it is not as good as ability to

ANS: D
User avatar
torto
Joined: 18 Sep 2016
Last visit: 01 Feb 2022
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 409
Posts: 26
Kudos: 44
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is there any parallelism here?
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,393
Own Kudos:
15,523
 [2]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,393
Kudos: 15,523
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
torto
Is there any parallelism here?

Whenever there is an "or" or an "and", there is parallelism. In option D, you would probably find the paralleism for the "or"s yourself. As for the "and", the parallelism is between two clauses:
Clause 1: "One complaint...is..."
AND
Clause 2: "Tricking... is..."
(For clarity, above I have mentioned only the main subjects and the main verbs of the 2 parallel clauses.)
User avatar
itisSheldon
Joined: 03 Mar 2018
Last visit: 26 Jan 2022
Posts: 161
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 101
Posts: 161
Kudos: 669
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tk1tez7777
One complaint about recently developed “care” robots – robots designed to help care for elderly or sick patients in their home – is that they do not have the capacity for listening, expressing emotion, and tricking patients to think they can is unethical.

is that they do not have the capacity for listening, expressing emotion, and tricking patients to think they can is unethical
is that they do not have the capacity to listen, to express emotion, and to trick patients to think they can is unethical
is that they do not have the capacity for listening or expressing emotion, and tricking patients to think they can is unethical
is that they do not have the capacity to listen or express emotion, and tricking patients to think they can is unethical
is that they do not have the capacity to listen or express emotion, and tricking patients that they are doing this is unethical
Veritas Prep OFFICIAL EXPLANATION

Answer choices (A) and (B) contain the easiest errors – both relating to sentence construction. The second part of the clause following the dash is not a series in relation to “listening, expressing emotion” in (A) or “to listen, to express” in (B) The robots lack the capacity to/for these two things and then separately the sentence is saying that “tricking patients to think that they” can do these things is unethical. (C), (D) and (E) properly separate off the second part of the clause with a comma and “and” but only (D) has the proper structure to follow the infinitive “to listen or express”. When auxiliary verbs such as “can” are used to replace full verbs (here “listen or express”), they must be able to be logically followed by the structure that precedes it. In (C) it is incorrect to use “listening or expressing” and then say “tricking patients that they can LISTENING OR EXPRESSING is unethical” In (D), you have the proper “tricking patients that they can LISTEN OR EXPRESS emotion is unethical” For (E), you likewise cannot say that “they are doing LISTEN or EXPRESS emotion” Only (D) matches up the correct structures and is thus the correct answer.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,832
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,832
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts