MartyTargetTestPrep
dcoolguy
Whats wrong with E?
Rise in A along with increase in B. Seems odd.
Rise in increase in B??
What exactly is wrong with E?
There isn't anything clearly wrong with (E), and there isn't anything clearly wrong with (B) either.
This question isn't great.
We are in partial agreement,
MartyTargetTestPrep: I do not think the question is great. The difference between (B) and (D) is marginal, and I can find no analogue from the catalogue of official SC questions. That said, I agree with
ExpertsGlobal5 that (E) uses a pretty poor construction to define three elements in a list:
... offering tax rebates leads to X along with Y, and Z. I suppose someone could argue that X and Y can be linked in a certain way to warrant such treatment—i.e.
... leads to X1 along with X2, and Y—in which the comma would act as a stop between the forked X element and the second element of the list. However, I would certainly disfavor (E) as a list if I had another iteration of the sentence that clearly separated X, Y, and Z, and here, we have three such options in (A), (B), and (D).
You do not owe me or the community a rebuttal, but if you feel inclined to defend (E), I would like to hear your thoughts.
- Andrew