It is currently 17 Dec 2017, 15:27

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Outlawing the possession of handguns will never reduce

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 03 Jul 2017
Posts: 62

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 31

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GPA: 3.4
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member CAT Tests
Outlawing the possession of handguns will never reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Nov 2017, 05:55
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

91% (01:22) correct 9% (01:15) wrong based on 57 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Outlawing the possession of handguns will never reduce the number of deaths and injuries that are the result of such weapons. People know that guns are effective and will find new, although illegal, ways to get them. No laws restricting the sale and ownership of handguns will prevent those who want them from having them.

Which of the following would best strengthen the above argument?

    A. A recent ban on the possession of concealed weapons other than handguns has resulted in significantly lower rates of death and injury related to these weapons.
    B. In light of certain rights guaranteed by the Constitution, legislation legal bans on the possession of handguns will not be easy.
    C. Often, outlawing a product or commodity tends to increase the desire to possess that product and demand actually rises.
    D. Many advocates of gun control believe that it is the weapon and not the possessor of the weapon that is responsible for the violence associated with handguns.
    E. Legislating a ban on only those handguns that are statistically more often involved in injury and death should be sufficient to temper the demand.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 31

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Status: Prepping for GMAT
Joined: 06 Nov 2017
Posts: 16

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 26

Location: France
GPA: 4
Re: Outlawing the possession of handguns will never reduce [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Nov 2017, 04:35
abansal1805 wrote:
Outlawing the possession of handguns will never reduce the number of deaths and injuries that are the result of such weapons. People know that guns are effective and will find new, although illegal, ways to get them. No laws restricting the sale and ownership of handguns will prevent those who want them from having them.

Which of the following would best strengthen the above argument?

    A. A recent ban on the possession of concealed weapons other than handguns has resulted in significantly lower rates of death and injury related to these weapons.
    B. In light of certain rights guaranteed by the Constitution, legislation legal bans on the possession of handguns will not be easy.
    C. Often, outlawing a product or commodity tends to increase the desire to possess that product and demand actually rises.
    D. Many advocates of gun control believe that it is the weapon and not the possessor of the weapon that is responsible for the violence associated with handguns.
    E. Legislating a ban on only those handguns that are statistically more often involved in injury and death should be sufficient to temper the demand.


The answer is C. This is a strengthen-type question therefore, we need to find a statement that further reinforces the strength of the conclusion.

In this case, the conclusion is: "No laws restricting the sale and ownership of handguns will prevent those who want them from having them". Rephrased, it means that folks will circumvent the law, by any means necessary, to get their hands on guns.

Let's go over the answers:
A/ This actually weakens the argument by providing an example of a legislation that succeeded in lowering the instances of deaths and injuries caused by handguns
B/ Same as A, this answer weakens the argument
C/ Correct answer
D/ Irrelevant
E/ Irrelevant

Hope that helps.

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 26

Re: Outlawing the possession of handguns will never reduce   [#permalink] 17 Nov 2017, 04:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Outlawing the possession of handguns will never reduce

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.