GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 10 Dec 2018, 00:42

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
  • Free lesson on number properties

     December 10, 2018

     December 10, 2018

     10:00 PM PST

     11:00 PM PST

    Practice the one most important Quant section - Integer properties, and rapidly improve your skills.
  • Free GMAT Prep Hour

     December 11, 2018

     December 11, 2018

     09:00 PM EST

     10:00 PM EST

    Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics. December 11 at 9 PM EST.

Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 23 Oct 2010
Posts: 351
Location: Azerbaijan
Concentration: Finance
Schools: HEC '15 (A)
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V38
GMAT ToolKit User
Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 05 Oct 2017, 02:50
3
12
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

57% (01:47) correct 43% (02:13) wrong based on 767 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has studied the courses selected by freshmen at State University. Without exception, and without regard to major, the students who enrolled in organic chemistry during their freshman year graduated with a higher overall grade point average than did the students who did not take organic chemistry during their freshman year. Thus, organic chemistry should be mandatory for freshmen since it clearly promotes academic success.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the conclusion above?

A. Most State University students who took organic chemistry in their freshmen year did not earn a high grade in that class.
B. Currently, in order to enroll in organic chemistry as freshmen, students must pass a rigorous series of prerequisite exams.
C. The average grade point average of graduates of State University has risen steadily over the past ten years.
D. Many State University graduates who took organic chemistry in their freshman year did not graduate in the top 20 percent of the class.
E. Most State University graduates who graduated in the top 20 percent of the class took at least one chemistry course every year during college.

source-kaplan
need more explanation on B and C

_________________

Happy are those who dream dreams and are ready to pay the price to make them come true

I am still on all gmat forums. msg me if you want to ask me smth


Originally posted by LalaB on 27 Mar 2012, 08:40.
Last edited by Mahmud6 on 05 Oct 2017, 02:50, edited 1 time in total.
Format
Most Helpful Expert Reply
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 301
Re: Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Mar 2012, 17:27
4
1
Let's simplify the argument:

Those taking freshman OC received a higher grade point average than those who didn't. Therefore, all should take freshman OC.

Analysis: If there is something different about the freshmen who take OC from those that don't, then we have cannot logically conclude that anyone who takes freshman OC will get a higher GPA.

(B) provides a reason. The group who takes freshmen OC are different. They had to pass rigorous tests. Basically they are the very smart ones. It is not the fact that they take OC that makes them smart.

Thus (B) is the answer.

(C) does not make a distinction between the group. Indeed, it doesn't even mention those who take freshmen OC. It just talks about graduates in general and therefore does not relate to the argument.

Hope that helps :).
_________________

Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Most Helpful Community Reply
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Writing Essays
Joined: 25 Nov 2011
Posts: 132
Location: Brazil
Concentration: Technology, Finance
GMAT 1: 720 Q44 V47
WE: Information Technology (Commercial Banking)
Reviews Badge
Re: Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Mar 2012, 08:51
3
2
LalaB wrote:
Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has studied the courses selected by freshmen at State University. Without exception, and without regard to major, the students who enrolled in organic chemistry during their freshman year graduated with a higher overall grade point average than did the students who did not take organic chemistry during their freshman year. Thus, organic chemistry should be mandatory for freshmen since it clearly promotes academic success.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the conclusion above?

-Most State University students who took organic chemistry in their freshmen year did not earn a high grade in that class.
-Currently, in order to enroll in organic chemistry as freshmen, students must pass a rigorous series of prerequisite exams.
-The average grade point average of graduates of State University has risen steadily over the past ten years.
-Many State University graduates who took organic chemistry in their freshman year did not graduate in the top 20 percent of the class.
-Most State University graduates who graduated in the top 20 percent of the class took at least one chemistry course every year during college.

source-kaplan
need more explanation on B and C


-Most State University students who took organic chemistry in their freshmen year did not earn a high grade in that class. (wrong, out of scope, the grade is not relevant, only if the freshmen took or not the course)
-Currently, in order to enroll in organic chemistry as freshmen, students must pass a rigorous series of prerequisite exams. (correct, if the students need to take a rigorous exam to join the organic chemistry class it is very likely that they are best students overall and thus more likely to graduate on school with best overall grades)
-The average grade point average of graduates of State University has risen steadily over the past ten years. (wrong, out of scope)
-Many State University graduates who took organic chemistry in their freshman year did not graduate in the top 20 percent of the class. (wrong, there is no information about ranking between students, only whether they took or not the organic chemistry course).
-Most State University graduates who graduated in the top 20 percent of the class took at least one chemistry course every year during college. (wrong, actually strenghten the conclusion)
General Discussion
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 184
Re: Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Mar 2012, 13:58
Not sure why it should be B

I voted for C - it makes more sense

Conclusion : "organic chemistry should be mandatory for freshmen since it clearly promotes academic success."

Premise 1 : the students who enrolled in organic chemistry during their freshman year graduated with a higher overall grade point average than did the students who did not take organic chemistry during their freshman year.

bookmarking for future reference
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: Writing Essays
Joined: 25 Nov 2011
Posts: 132
Location: Brazil
Concentration: Technology, Finance
GMAT 1: 720 Q44 V47
WE: Information Technology (Commercial Banking)
Reviews Badge
Re: Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Mar 2012, 14:05
kuttingchai wrote:
Not sure why it should be B

I voted for C - it makes more sense

Conclusion : "organic chemistry should be mandatory for freshmen since it clearly promotes academic success."

Premise 1 : the students who enrolled in organic chemistry during their freshman year graduated with a higher overall grade point average than did the students who did not take organic chemistry during their freshman year.

bookmarking for future reference


kuttingchai,

C doesn't make any distinction between the students who took the organic chemistry or not. The steadily rise on graduates average grade could be result of a wide range of factors. There is no evidence if this increase is because there is more students taking the chemistry course and thus, the chemistry course must be mandatory for freshman.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Status: schools I listed were for the evening programs, not FT
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 381
Location: United States (VA)
GMAT 1: 640 Q47 V32
GMAT 2: 640 Q43 V34
GMAT 3: 660 Q43 V38
GPA: 3.1
WE: Research (Other)
Re: Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Mar 2012, 19:13
voted for the wrong answer here.....
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Oct 2011
Posts: 112
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
GMAT 2: 720 Q48 V40
Re: Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Mar 2012, 08:29
1
I'd say B as well. A student's attendance in the chemistry class is correlated with his GPA, the author inferes from this that the attendance caused the high GPA, to weaken this you need to find a different cause for the correlation, the test, which only the brightest students, who are more likely to graduate with a high GPA anyway, pass, gives such a cause.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2012
Posts: 2
Re: Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2012, 23:10
Why E supports the argument...
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Jan 2010
Posts: 61
Schools: IIM
Re: Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2012, 00:32
Good question and Choice B is indeed right. B provides a reason why just taking organic chemistry is not the reason for higher overall grade.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Final Countdown
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Posts: 451
Location: India
GPA: 3.82
WE: Account Management (Retail Banking)
Re: Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2012, 01:13
1
why not (A)
-Most State University students who took organic chemistry in their freshmen year did not earn a high grade in that class.
_________________

" Make more efforts "
Press Kudos if you liked my post

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2013
Posts: 38
Re: Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Sep 2013, 09:48
thevenus wrote:
why not (A)
-Most State University students who took organic chemistry in their freshmen year did not earn a high grade in that class.


I am confused.. Why can't the answer be A?
Most State University students who took organic chemistry in their freshmen year did not earn a high grade in that class.
If this were true, then it means that taking organic chemistry doesn't lead to high grades.


Thanks in advance...
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 1021
Location: United States
Premium Member
Re: Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Sep 2013, 14:35
1
domfrancondumas wrote:
thevenus wrote:
why not (A)
-Most State University students who took organic chemistry in their freshmen year did not earn a high grade in that class.


I am confused.. Why can't the answer be A?
Most State University students who took organic chemistry in their freshmen year did not earn a high grade in that class.
If this were true, then it means that taking organic chemistry doesn't lead to high grades.


Thanks in advance...



Hi domfrancondumas

Interesting question. But you missed a conclusion.

Let read the argument one more time.

Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has studied the courses selected by freshmen at State University. Without exception, and without regard to major, the students who enrolled in organic chemistry during their freshman year graduated with a higher overall grade point average than did the students who did not take organic chemistry during their freshman year. Thus, organic chemistry should be mandatory for freshmen since it clearly promotes academic success.

The argument presents the fact that those who took organic chemistry class during their freshman year ==> will graduate with higher overall grade. Thus, the argument concludes that taking organic chemistry make students have higher academic grades. You need to break this conclusion by showing that taking organic chemistry is not the main cause.

Let see A)
Most State University students who took organic chemistry in their freshmen year did not earn a high grade in that class.

A just says that students did NOT have high grade in only organic chemistry class. A does not say that students who took organic chemistry in their freshmen year did not have high grade at their graduation.

Thus, A does not help to weaken the conclusion.

Hope it helps.
_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 07 Jun 2015
Posts: 75
WE: Design (Aerospace and Defense)
Re: Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Sep 2015, 18:07
" overall grade point average than did the students who did not take organic chemistry".This is the key point in the premise.One need to be n top 20 to get a high average.
Board of Directors
User avatar
P
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2625
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Oct 2016, 06:58
LalaB wrote:
Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has studied the courses selected by freshmen at State University. Without exception, and without regard to major, the students who enrolled in organic chemistry during their freshman year graduated with a higher overall grade point average than did the students who did not take organic chemistry during their freshman year. Thus, organic chemistry should be mandatory for freshmen since it clearly promotes academic success.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the conclusion above?

-Most State University students who took organic chemistry in their freshmen year did not earn a high grade in that class.
-Currently, in order to enroll in organic chemistry as freshmen, students must pass a rigorous series of prerequisite exams.
-The average grade point average of graduates of State University has risen steadily over the past ten years.
-Many State University graduates who took organic chemistry in their freshman year did not graduate in the top 20 percent of the class.
-Most State University graduates who graduated in the top 20 percent of the class took at least one chemistry course every year during college.

source-kaplan
need more explanation on B and C


straight B without any questions!
If to take organic chemistry, you need to pass some prerequisite exams, then only the best students could actually get into the OC class. Without doubt, the best students will have greater GPA than the rest.
SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1653
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jul 2017, 04:03
this is a common pattern in weaken question
VP
VP
User avatar
D
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1069
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jul 2017, 08:27
Imo B Currently, in order to enroll in organic chemistry as freshmen, students must pass a rigorous series of prerequisite exams.
If the students are smart then they do not have to take organic chemistry and all those students taking student chemistry are because they had taken rigorous series of prerequisite exams
_________________

Please give kudos if you found my answers useful

CR & LSAT Forum Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Studying for the LSAT -- Corruptus in Extremis
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Posts: 418
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Reviews Badge
Re: Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Sep 2017, 05:10
Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has studied the courses selected by freshmen at State University. Without exception, and without regard to major, the students who enrolled in organic chemistry during their freshman year graduated with a higher overall grade point average than did the students who did not take organic chemistry during their freshman year. Thus, organic chemistry should be mandatory for freshmen since it clearly promotes academic success.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the conclusion above?

-Most State University students who took organic chemistry in their freshmen year did not earn a high grade in that class.
-Currently, in order to enroll in organic chemistry as freshmen, students must pass a rigorous series of prerequisite exams.
-The average grade point average of graduates of State University has risen steadily over the past ten years.
-Many State University graduates who took organic chemistry in their freshman year did not graduate in the top 20 percent of the class.
-Most State University graduates who graduated in the top 20 percent of the class took at least one chemistry course every year during college.

To me, B and E are close. I understand why B is correct, In fact I got it right, but I was hung up on E. Isn't E saying that Chemistry students are smarter than most, so taking one class won't help? To me, B and E are saying essentially the same thing. Any help on this would be appreciated!
_________________

D-Day: November 18th, 2017

Need a laugh and a break? Go here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/mental-break-funny-videos-270269.html

Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 503
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Oct 2017, 02:57
I have a doubt on B.

The argument is talking about the performance over the last ten years, whereas option B is talking about current period. Currently students may need to pass a rigorous series of prerequisite exams, but does it meant that they needed to pass a rigorous series of prerequisite exams over the last ten years?
_________________

Hasan Mahmud

Intern
Intern
User avatar
B
Joined: 10 Jan 2018
Posts: 10
Re: Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Mar 2018, 00:05
I share this thought. The word currently makes it ambigious. If it would not be used, answer B would ber 100% correct imo

Mahmud6 wrote:
I have a doubt on B.

The argument is talking about the performance over the last ten years, whereas option B is talking about current period. Currently students may need to pass a rigorous series of prerequisite exams, but does it meant that they needed to pass a rigorous series of prerequisite exams over the last ten years?
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has &nbs [#permalink] 14 Mar 2018, 00:05
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Over the last ten years, the Office of the Provost has

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.