Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 11:14 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 11:14
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sridevi31
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Last visit: 28 Sep 2021
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
24
 [5]
Given Kudos: 65
Location: India
Schools: Kelley '24 NUS Yale '24
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
Schools: Kelley '24 NUS Yale '24
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
Posts: 18
Kudos: 24
 [5]
owers: A few theorists hold the extreme view that society could flour 14 Aug 2021, 12:47
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

85% (hard)

Question Stats:

38% (02:06) correct 62% (02:46) wrong based on 37 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Bowers: A few theorists hold the extreme view that society could flourish in a condition of anarchy, the absence of government. Some of these theorists have even produced interesting arguments to support that position. One writer, for example, contends that anarchy is laissez-faire capitalism taken to its logical extreme. But these theorists’ views ignore the fundamental principle of social philosophy—that an acceptable social philosophy must promote peace and order. Any social philosophy that countenances chaos, i.e., anarchy, accordingly deserves no further attention.

The reasoning in Bowers’s argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that

(A) the meaning of a key term shifts illicitly during the course of the argument
(B) the argument fails to show that laissez-faire capitalism deserves to be rejected as a social philosophy
(C) the truth or falsity of a view is not determined by the number of people who accept it as true
(D) the argument presumes, without providing justification, that any peaceful society will flourish
(E) it is unreasonable to reject a view merely because it can be described as extreme

Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
A
User avatar
Kinshook
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,794
Own Kudos:
5,510
Given Kudos: 161
Location: India
Schools: HBS '26 CBS '26 Wharton '26
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: HBS '26 CBS '26 Wharton '26
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 5,794
Kudos: 5,510
owers: A few theorists hold the extreme view that society could flour 14 Aug 2021, 23:01
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Sridevi31

Can you please provide OE (Official Explanation) for the question?

Sridevi31
Bowers: A few theorists hold the extreme view that society could flourish in a condition of anarchy, the absence of government. Some of these theorists have even produced interesting arguments to support that position. One writer, for example, contends that anarchy is laissez-faire capitalism taken to its logical extreme. But these theorists’ views ignore the fundamental principle of social philosophy—that an acceptable social philosophy must promote peace and order. Any social philosophy that countenances chaos, i.e., anarchy, accordingly deserves no further attention.

The reasoning in Bowers’s argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that

(A) the meaning of a key term shifts illicitly during the course of the argument
(B) the argument fails to show that laissez-faire capitalism deserves to be rejected as a social philosophy
(C) the truth or falsity of a view is not determined by the number of people who accept it as true
(D) the argument presumes, without providing justification, that any peaceful society will flourish
(E) it is unreasonable to reject a view merely because it can be described as extreme
Show more
User avatar
Sridevi31
User avatar
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Last visit: 28 Sep 2021
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
24
Given Kudos: 65
Location: India
Schools: Kelley '24 NUS Yale '24
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
Schools: Kelley '24 NUS Yale '24
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
Posts: 18
Kudos: 24
owers: A few theorists hold the extreme view that society could flour 14 Aug 2021, 23:28
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Kinshook
Hi Sridevi31

Can you please provide OE (Official Explanation) for the question?

Sridevi31
Bowers: A few theorists hold the extreme view that society could flourish in a condition of anarchy, the absence of government. Some of these theorists have even produced interesting arguments to support that position. One writer, for example, contends that anarchy is laissez-faire capitalism taken to its logical extreme. But these theorists’ views ignore the fundamental principle of social philosophy—that an acceptable social philosophy must promote peace and order. Any social philosophy that countenances chaos, i.e., anarchy, accordingly deserves no further attention.

The reasoning in Bowers’s argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that

(A) the meaning of a key term shifts illicitly during the course of the argument
(B) the argument fails to show that laissez-faire capitalism deserves to be rejected as a social philosophy
(C) the truth or falsity of a view is not determined by the number of people who accept it as true
(D) the argument presumes, without providing justification, that any peaceful society will flourish
(E) it is unreasonable to reject a view merely because it can be described as extreme
Show more

It Will be posted by EOD . Happy Independence Day.
User avatar
rvgmat12
User avatar
Joined: 19 Oct 2014
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 356
Own Kudos:
373
 [1]
Given Kudos: 189
Location: United Arab Emirates
Schools: Wharton '23 Booth '23 INSEAD Jan'21 Intake
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: Wharton '23 Booth '23 INSEAD Jan'21 Intake
Posts: 356
Kudos: 373
 [1]
owers: A few theorists hold the extreme view that society could flour 15 Aug 2021, 00:07
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The conclusion of the argument is that the "extreme view that society could flourish in a condition of anarchy" "deserves no further attention." Why? The argument first defines anarchy as "the absence of government." Then, the author points to the fact that the theorist's holding this "extreme view" have ignored "the fundamental principle of social philosophy - that an acceptable philosophy must promote peace and order." Thus, a social philosophy that countenances (i.e. that allows) chaos, i.e., anarchy, accordingly deserves no further attention. So in this second instance, the author has defined anarchy as a social philosophy that countenances chaos, but we have been given no information as to why or how anarchy countenances chaos.

So answer choice (A) is correct because the meaning of a key term, i.e. anarchy, shifts "illicitly during the course of the argument" from just "the absence of government" to "a social philosophy that countenances chaos."
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
778,312
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,312
owers: A few theorists hold the extreme view that society could flour 15 Aug 2021, 06:41
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sridevi31
Bowers: A few theorists hold the extreme view that society could flourish in a condition of anarchy, the absence of government. Some of these theorists have even produced interesting arguments to support that position. One writer, for example, contends that anarchy is laissez-faire capitalism taken to its logical extreme. But these theorists’ views ignore the fundamental principle of social philosophy—that an acceptable social philosophy must promote peace and order. Any social philosophy that countenances chaos, i.e., anarchy, accordingly deserves no further attention.

The reasoning in Bowers’s argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that

(A) the meaning of a key term shifts illicitly during the course of the argument
(B) the argument fails to show that laissez-faire capitalism deserves to be rejected as a social philosophy
(C) the truth or falsity of a view is not determined by the number of people who accept it as true
(D) the argument presumes, without providing justification, that any peaceful society will flourish
(E) it is unreasonable to reject a view merely because it can be described as extreme
Show more

Please search before posting: bowers-a-few-theorists-hold-the-extreme-view-that-society-could-flour-288856.html#p2227579 Thank you!

Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
miag
189 posts