Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
The Focus Edition allows barely 2 minutes per question. Hence, rereading portions of passages is not an option. Learn our Involved and Evolved reading strategy, the most efficacious solution to time saving on RC and score high on GMAT Verbal!
Dreaming of getting into ISB but worried about your GMAT score? Bhavya’s journey shows that a strong profile can be just as important! Discover how she gained admission to the prestigious ISB with a 670 GMAT in the competitive R2, with GMATWhiz.
We are excited to bring you the Fall edition of the MBA Spotlight Fair! Meet admission officers from the top 20 MBA programs—including HBS, Stanford, and Wharton—as you prepare for Round 2 applications.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
100%
(00:59)
correct
0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 73
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Traditionally, candidates for elected offices have concentrated their efforts on the early stages of the campaign during which, most people believed, the voters' perceptions of candidates were formed. It is now becoming clear, however, that elections can be decided in the few days preceding election day; public opinion polls taken during recent elections provide evidence of several such races. In those cases, the losing candidates would have been well advised to have forgone early spending and instead saved funds for television advertisements late in their campaign.
The conclusion above assumes that which of the following is true?
(A) No candidate for elected office can mount a successful campaign without allocating a large portion of campaign funds to television advertising.
(B) The losing candidates described would have won their respective campaigns had they not spent as heavily in the early stages of those campaigns.
(C) The winning candidates described accrued more funds throughout their campaigns than did the losing candidates.
(D) Candidates who spend a large amount of their campaign funds on television advertising are more successful than those who spend the same amount on print advertising.
(E) The losing candidates described would not have eliminated their chances of winning by spending less in the early stages of their campaigns.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Clear option E. The argument says that it would have been a good thing to suggest losing candidates, as per opinion polls, to forego their spending to a later stage. This implies that the argument still believes that there is a winning chance for these candidates. Option E clears that by saying that winning chances have not been eliminated.
saicharan1191: could you please explain me why option B is wrong?
Akash,
Option B says that candidate would have won if he had not spent much initially. It is not logical to support this statement. The argument just says that if public polls are followed, we can anticipate who is going to win and hence advice the losing candidate to not spend much initially but do at last stages. This does not mean that candidate will win if he does not spend initially. So option B is wrong. So in suggesting the candidate to forego spending to a later stage, argument is still based on the assumption that there is a chance for candidate to win without initial spending. This is what option E says.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.