GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 22 Oct 2018, 00:48

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Oct 2006
Posts: 21
Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Oct 2006, 15:17
4
24
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

79% (00:40) correct 21% (00:55) wrong based on 2237 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed in Burma and estimated at 40 to 44 million years old provide evidence of a crucial step along the evolutionary path that led to human beings.


(A) at 40 to 44 million years old provide evidence of

(B) as being 40 to 44 million years old provides evidence of

(C) that it is 40 to 44 million years old provides evidence of what was

(D) to be 40 to 44 million years old provide evidence of

(E) as 40 to 44 million years old provides evidence of
Most Helpful Community Reply
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Posts: 298
Location: Phoenix, AZ, USA
Re: Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Oct 2006, 16:00
4
1
Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed in Burma and estimated at 40 to 44 million years old provide evidence of a crucial step along the evolutionary path that led to human beings.

(A) at 40 to 44 million years old provide evidence of
(B) as being 40 to 44 million years old provides evidence of
(C) that it is 40 to 44 million years old provides evidence of what was
(D) to be 40 to 44 million years old provide evidence of
(E) as 40 to 44 million years old provides evidence of

Answer D
Estimated to be is correct idiom and fragments of jawbone is plural hence provide
General Discussion
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 943
Re: Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Oct 2006, 19:22
2
one more D.

Reasons:

1. Estimated... to be
2. Fragments...provide

finley, my eyes search for OA, if I know ...OA is in white color :wink: . Appreciate, if u dont post the OA till there are atleast 10 responses.
_________________

The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short;
the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Jul 2009
Posts: 43
Re: Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Aug 2009, 10:53
1
sher676 wrote:
Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed in Burma and estimated at 40 to 44 million years old provide evidence of a crucial step along the evolutionary path that led to human beings.
(A) at 40 to 44 million years old provide evidence of
(B) as being 40 to 44 million years old provides evidence of
(C) that it is 40 to 44 million years old provides evidence of what was
(D) to be 40 to 44 million years old provide evidence of
(E) as 40 to 44 million years old provides evidence of what was

OA D


The only choices to look at are A and D since the rest don't conjugate the verb correctly. Fragments...provide...
D is idiomatic, thus correct.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2009
Posts: 242
Concentration: Nonprofit, Strategy
GPA: 3.42
WE: Engineering (Computer Hardware)
Re: Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Aug 2009, 17:44
1
D because "estimate to be" is the correct idiom and "fragments" matches with "provide"
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 13 Jul 2012
Posts: 2
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 600 Q48 V25
GPA: 3.12
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
Re: Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Feb 2013, 23:11
sprtng wrote:
D because "estimate to be" is the correct idiom and "fragments" matches with "provide"


its true that fragments matches with provide. But jawbone matches with provides in answer choice C.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Making every effort to create original content for you!!
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 474
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Feb 2013, 23:28
1
1
tejastalak wrote:
sprtng wrote:
D because "estimate to be" is the correct idiom and "fragments" matches with "provide"


its true that fragments matches with provide. But jawbone matches with provides in answer choice C.


Hi tejastalak,

You are right in your reasoning that subject verb pairs "fragments and provide" and "jawbone and provides" match. However, if you see the sentence, it intends to say that actually the "fragments of Jawbone" provided the evidence. Using "fragments" as the subject of the verb "provide" would express the idea in a better way. Choice (D) does in fact say that "fragments provided the evidence"; moreover, it is more concise than (C), making it an even better choice than (D).

Hope it helps

Vercules
_________________

Press Kudos if you want to say thanks

Ultimate Reading Comprehension Encyclopedia | Ultimate Sentence Correction Encyclopedia | GMAT Prep Software Analysis and What If Scenarios -- VERBAL | GMAT Prep Software Analysis and What If Scenarios -- IR

Please Read and Follow the 9 Rules of Posting in Verbal Forum

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: *Lost and found*
Joined: 25 Feb 2013
Posts: 122
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 640 Q42 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Web Development (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jun 2013, 02:30
zazoz wrote:
Hi guys! just a refresher, enjoy!

Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed in Burma and estimated at 40 to 44 million years old provide evidence of a crucial step along the evolutionary path that led to human beings.

(A) at 40 to 44 million years old provide evidence of
(B) as being 40 to 44 million years old provides evidence of
(C) that it is 40 to 44 million years old provides evidence of what was
(D) to be 40 to 44 million years old provide evidence of
(E) as 40 to 44 million years old provides evidence of what was

OA: D


I guess the trick is to understand the difference between 'estimated at' and 'estimated to be'. Since at is a preposition, it should be followed by a noun, whereas 40 to 40 million years old is not. Hence the structure is inaccurate. Furthermore 'estimated to be' is the proper idiomatic usage which includes the infinitive to make sure a valid range can be described.

Good one zazoz! :)

Regards,
A
_________________

Feed me some KUDOS! :) :) *always hungry*

My Thread : Recommendation Letters

SVP
SVP
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 2264
Location: New York, NY
Re: Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Aug 2013, 17:12
1
"fragments" is plural so the only possible options are (A) and (D).

"estimated at" vs "estimated to be" - "estimated to be" is better. Choose (D).
So yes, for this example, you need to know this idiom..
Intern
Intern
avatar
Status: Applications.
Affiliations: None
Joined: 16 Jan 2013
Posts: 11
Concentration: General Management, Technology
Schools: Cox '17 (A)
GMAT 1: 580 Q49 V21
GMAT 2: 720 Q48 V41
GPA: 4
Reviews Badge
Re: Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Aug 2013, 20:56
D it is.

Guys, Does estimate as have a correct usage ?

I just see estimate to be in Manhattan , so just checking.
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4493
Re: Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Oct 2013, 13:21
3
1
rpfinley wrote:
Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed in Burma and estimated at 40 to 44 million years old provide evidence of a crucial step along the evolutionary path that led to human beings.

(A) at 40 to 44 million years old provide evidence of
(B) as being 40 to 44 million years old provides evidence of
(C) that it is 40 to 44 million years old provides evidence of what was
(D) to be 40 to 44 million years old provide evidence of
(E) as 40 to 44 million years old provides evidence of

As other have mentioned, this is an Idiom question, and the correct idiom is "estimate to be". Here's a link to a free GMAT Idiom ebook:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-idiom-ebook/
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep


Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 06 Nov 2012
Posts: 15
Location: India
Concentration: General Management
WE: Information Technology (Telecommunications)
Re: Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Oct 2013, 14:12
mikemcgarry wrote:
rpfinley wrote:
Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed in Burma and estimated at 40 to 44 million years old provide evidence of a crucial step along the evolutionary path that led to human beings.

(A) at 40 to 44 million years old provide evidence of
(B) as being 40 to 44 million years old provides evidence of
(C) that it is 40 to 44 million years old provides evidence of what was
(D) to be 40 to 44 million years old provide evidence of
(E) as 40 to 44 million years old provides evidence of

As other have mentioned, this is an Idiom question, and the correct idiom is "estimate to be". Here's a link to a free GMAT Idiom ebook:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-idiom-ebook/
Mike :-)


Thanks for the reply Mike ,

But in the problem from gmat prep

With surface temperatures estimated at minus 230 degrees Farenheit, Jupiter's moon Europa has long been considered far too cold to support life, its 60 square miles of water though to be frozen from top to bottom

"estimated at" is used in non underlined portion. So I mentioned the same in post above.
_________________

I do the very best I know how - the very best I can; and I mean to keep on doing so until the end -- Abraham Lincoln

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4493
Re: Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Oct 2013, 16:08
1
targetdec31 wrote:
Thanks for the reply Mike ,
But in the problem from gmat prep
With surface temperatures estimated at minus 230 degrees Fahrenheit, Jupiter's moon Europa has long been considered far too cold to support life, its 60 square miles of water thought to be frozen from top to bottom
"estimated at" is used in non underlined portion. So I mentioned the same in post above.

Dear targetdec31,
Hmmm. On a few occasions, unfortunately I have seen inconsistencies in the GMAT's own material, and it usually shows up in this form --- something never would be right in an underlined section is presented as part of the non-underlined (theoretically correct) part of the sentence. I suspect this is because the GMAC folks generate a large number of possible questions and then subject those questions to an extensive "experimental" testing period, during which focus is on the underlined portion and the alternatives --- after all, that's what determines the quality of the question. I imagine that the non-underlined portion simply does not receive the same level of scrutiny, such that sometimes something like this will slip through in the non-underlined section. Nobody's perfect, not even the people who write the GMAT.

All I can say is --- "estimated to be" is the correct idiom, and "estimated at" would never be correct as an alternative to an underlined section of a GMAT SC question.

Does this make sense?

Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep


Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

SVP
SVP
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 2264
Location: New York, NY
Re: Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Dec 2013, 11:11
SRG13 wrote:
D it is.

Guys, Does estimate as have a correct usage ?

I just see estimate to be in Manhattan , so just checking.


Most likely not. Stick to the ones mentioned above.

You can also reference a video explanation provided here:

Image
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jan 2013
Posts: 158
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Jan 2014, 09:19
1
rpfinley wrote:
Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed in Burma and estimated at 40 to 44 million years old provide evidence of a crucial step along the evolutionary path that led to human beings.

(A) at 40 to 44 million years old provide evidence of
(B) as being 40 to 44 million years old provides evidence of
(C) that it is 40 to 44 million years old provides evidence of what was
(D) to be 40 to 44 million years old provide evidence of
(E) as 40 to 44 million years old provides evidence of

OA is D



The subject is fragments, so the verb needs to be plural (provide, not provides). B, C and E gone.

A) "estimated AT" sounds wrong because it implies you do it at a specific position of "40 to 44 million years old". So A sounds weird but we keep it as a contender

D) "estimated TO BE 40 to 44 million.." sounds much better, it preserves the intended meaning of the author instead of creating ambiguity. Since we're only concerned with A and D, D is our choice.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 01 Jan 2013
Posts: 51
Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Mar 2014, 23:45
sher676 wrote:
Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed in Burma and estimated at 40 to 44 million years old provide evidence of a crucial step along the evolutionary path that led to human beings.
(A) at 40 to 44 million years old provide evidence of
(B) as being 40 to 44 million years old provides evidence of
(C) that it is 40 to 44 million years old provides evidence of what was
(D) to be 40 to 44 million years old provide evidence of
(E) as 40 to 44 million years old provides evidence of what was



In this question how two verbs(estimated and provide) are present without any conjunction?

I guess estimated & unearthed are verb-ed modifier here .
Please explain.
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
G
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2708
Re: Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Mar 2014, 10:43
abid1986 wrote:
sher676 wrote:
Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed in Burma and estimated at 40 to 44 million years old provide evidence of a crucial step along the evolutionary path that led to human beings.
(A) at 40 to 44 million years old provide evidence of
(B) as being 40 to 44 million years old provides evidence of
(C) that it is 40 to 44 million years old provides evidence of what was
(D) to be 40 to 44 million years old provide evidence of
(E) as 40 to 44 million years old provides evidence of what was



In this question how two verbs(estimated and provide) are present without any conjunction?

I guess estimated & unearthed are verb-ed modifier here .
Please explain.


Dear Abid,

I think you've already answered your own question! "Unearthed" and "estimated" are modifiers, so "estimated" is not parallel to "provide", and no conjunction is needed. One way to be sure of this is to remove the modifiers and see whether the subject and verb still make sense:

Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone provide evidence of a crucial step along the evolutionary path that led to human beings.

"Fragments... provide" makes perfect sense.

Regards,
Meghna
_________________












| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 19 Apr 2013
Posts: 604
Concentration: Strategy, Healthcare
Schools: Sloan '18 (A)
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V41
GPA: 4
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Mar 2015, 01:41
1
Idiom question. Hope the gmat doesn't test such idioms anymore.
_________________

If my post was helpful, press Kudos. If not, then just press Kudos !!!

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4493
Re: Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Mar 2015, 11:20
Ergenekon wrote:
Idiom question. Hope the gmat doesn't test such idioms anymore.

Dear Ergenekon,

Despite rumors to the contrary, idioms are alive and well on the GMAT. See:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/how-import ... orrection/

You may find this ebook helpful:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-idiom-ebook/
Much of that same information is also available in flashcard form:
https://gmat.magoosh.com/flashcards/idioms

I hope this helps!
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep


Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 19 Apr 2013
Posts: 604
Concentration: Strategy, Healthcare
Schools: Sloan '18 (A)
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V41
GPA: 4
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Mar 2015, 11:42
mikemcgarry wrote:
Ergenekon wrote:
Idiom question. Hope the gmat doesn't test such idioms anymore.

Dear Ergenekon,

Despite rumors to the contrary, idioms are alive and well on the GMAT. See:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/how-import ... orrection/

You may find this ebook helpful:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-idiom-ebook/
Much of that same information is also available in flashcard form:
https://gmat.magoosh.com/flashcards/idioms

I hope this helps!
Mike :-)




Thanks Mike. I also thought about it. But why do you think we can get a conclusion based on og13 questions? We do not have any reason to believe that the gmat regards its guides as much as its real exam questions. Having mostly not clear explanations for og problems shows otherwise. In addition, questions in which idioms can be used to find the right answer do not prove that those questions can only be answered by idioms. In my opinion, the gmat products have value only because they are official questions. However, their products are very low - quality. If there was another company with the official questions (in theory), I am sure the gmac would just go bankrupt:). I bought exam pack 1 and was disappointed a lot. For 50 dollars(or more) they provided me with question from gmat paper. So we can't assume that the gmac paid really serious attention to this case in og 13.
_________________

If my post was helpful, press Kudos. If not, then just press Kudos !!!

GMAT Club Bot
Re: Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed &nbs [#permalink] 04 Mar 2015, 11:42

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 26 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Paleontologists believe that fragments of a primate jawbone unearthed

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.