Last visit was: 12 Jul 2025, 06:35 It is currently 12 Jul 2025, 06:35
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
705-805 Level|   Weaken|         
User avatar
broall
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Last visit: 07 Apr 2021
Posts: 1,138
Own Kudos:
6,944
 [29]
Given Kudos: 65
Status:Long way to go!
Location: Viet Nam
Posts: 1,138
Kudos: 6,944
 [29]
Kudos
Add Kudos
29
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Siva2021
Joined: 15 Feb 2017
Last visit: 06 Jul 2025
Posts: 56
Own Kudos:
479
 [6]
Given Kudos: 35
Posts: 56
Kudos: 479
 [6]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
sobby
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Last visit: 24 Jan 2022
Posts: 445
Own Kudos:
384
 [2]
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.76
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
Posts: 445
Kudos: 384
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
arvind910619
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 850
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 755
Status:Learning
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
Posts: 850
Kudos: 601
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
broall
Paleontologists have discovered fossils of centipedes that are 414 million years old. These fossils are at least 20 million years older than the earliest land-dwelling animals previously identified. The paleontologists are confident that these centipedes lived on land, even though the fossilized centipedes were discovered in rock that also contained fossilized remains of animals known to be water-dwelling.

The paleontologists' view would be LEAST supported by the truth of which one of the following?

(A) The legs of the fossilized centipedes were particularly suited to being a means of locomotion on land.

(B) All of the centipedes that had previously been discovered were land dwellers.

(C) The rock in which the fossilized centipedes were found was formed from mud flats that were occasionally covered by river water.

(D) Fossils of the earliest land-dwelling animals that had previously been identified were found in rock that did not contain fossilized remains of water-dwelling animals.

(E) Fossils of spiders with respiratory systems adapted only to breathing air were found in the same rock as the centipede fossils.

Source: LSAT

I think the answer is E
Fossils of spiders we re found with respiratory systems suited only to breathe air but this does not tell anything about the centipedes and we can not assume that they also had similar system for breathing.
User avatar
pra1785
Joined: 20 Jan 2016
Last visit: 10 Mar 2019
Posts: 145
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 64
Posts: 145
Kudos: 130
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
confused between D and E but I think I will go with D because option E states the possibility of centipede being land dweller by mentioning that the same rock had a spider fossil which was a land dweller along with centipede fossil and water dwelling animal fossil.
User avatar
nightblade354
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Last visit: 12 Jul 2025
Posts: 1,780
Own Kudos:
6,575
 [4]
Given Kudos: 3,290
Status:He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Going to Business School -- Corruptus in Extremis
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,780
Kudos: 6,575
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Paleontologists have discovered fossils of centipedes that are 414 million years old. These fossils are at least 20 million years older than the earliest land-dwelling animals previously identified. The paleontologists are confident that these centipedes lived on land, even though the fossilized centipedes were discovered in rock that also contained fossilized remains of animals known to be water-dwelling.

The paleontologists' view would be LEAST supported by the truth of which one of the following?

(A) The legs of the fossilized centipedes were particularly suited to being a means of locomotion on land. -- This says they were built to be on land, which supports our conclusion

(B) All of the centipedes that had previously been discovered were land dwellers. -- This, again, supports out conclusion based on history

(C) The rock in which the fossilized centipedes were found was formed from mud flats that were occasionally covered by river water. -- This says that fish fossils could have been placed with our creature well after our creature had already been fossilized. Therefore, this supports our conclusion

(D) Fossils of the earliest land-dwelling animals that had previously been identified were found in rock that did not contain fossilized remains of water-dwelling animals. -- So no other water-dwelling animals were found with other land-dwelling animals. This doesn't 100% weaken our conclusion, but it certainly doesn't support it. This is our answer

(E) Fossils of spiders with respiratory systems adapted only to breathing air were found in the same rock as the centipede fossils. -- This says that air-breathing species were found with our creature. This would support the idea, albeit not well, that our creature was land-dwelling, too. Thus, this supports or conclusion
User avatar
globaldesi
Joined: 28 Jul 2016
Last visit: 03 Jun 2025
Posts: 1,159
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 67
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Human Resources
Schools: ISB '18 (D)
GPA: 3.97
WE:Project Management (Finance: Investment Banking)
Products:
Schools: ISB '18 (D)
Posts: 1,159
Kudos: 1,901
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am confused between B and D.
B conclusion of "All of the centipedes that had previously been discovered were land dwellers." gives no proof that this will also be a land dweller.
Can someone explain
User avatar
nightblade354
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 31 Jul 2017
Last visit: 12 Jul 2025
Posts: 1,780
Own Kudos:
6,575
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3,290
Status:He came. He saw. He conquered. -- Going to Business School -- Corruptus in Extremis
Location: United States (MA)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,780
Kudos: 6,575
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
globaldesi
I am confused between B and D.
B conclusion of "All of the centipedes that had previously been discovered were land dwellers." gives no proof that this will also be a land dweller.
Can someone explain


Please see my explanation above. If it is still insufficient, I will explain further.
avatar
Im279
Joined: 21 Aug 2019
Last visit: 17 Dec 2019
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Accounting (Accounting)
Posts: 12
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
broall
Paleontologists have discovered fossils of centipedes that are 414 million years old. These fossils are at least 20 million years older than the earliest land-dwelling animals previously identified. The paleontologists are confident that these centipedes lived on land, even though the fossilized centipedes were discovered in rock that also contained fossilized remains of animals known to be water-dwelling.

The paleontologists' view would be LEAST supported by the truth of which one of the following?

(A) The legs of the fossilized centipedes were particularly suited to being a means of locomotion on land.

(B) All of the centipedes that had previously been discovered were land dwellers.

(C) The rock in which the fossilized centipedes were found was formed from mud flats that were occasionally covered by river water.

(D) Fossils of the earliest land-dwelling animals that had previously been identified were found in rock that did not contain fossilized remains of water-dwelling animals.

(E) Fossils of spiders with respiratory systems adapted only to breathing air were found in the same rock as the centipede fossils.

Source: LSAT

Least support means polar opposite (weakens) in the case above. This type of question is good for LSAT but for GMAT one can not assume that one is supposed to elect the polar opposite. The right answer could be the one which supports but does the least among all options which support the argument.
User avatar
Mizar18
Joined: 28 Jan 2019
Last visit: 06 Jun 2025
Posts: 177
Own Kudos:
264
 [2]
Given Kudos: 130
Location: Peru
Posts: 177
Kudos: 264
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The paleontologists' view would be LEAST supported by the truth of which one of the following?

Conclusion: Despite the fact that fossilized centipedes were discovered in rock that also contained remains of animals known to be water-dwelling, paleontologists are sure that centipedes lived on land.

We must find a choice that least support our argument, so the right answer choice could bea weak strengthener , an irrelevant option or a weakener.


(A) The legs of the fossilized centipedes were particularly suited to being a means of locomotion on land.

This one strengthen the theory that centipedes lived on land - Incorrect

(B) All of the centipedes that had previously been discovered were land dwellers.

This one is an irrelevant option. The fact that previously discovered centipedes were land dwellers does not prove anything about the new discovered fossils. - Incorrect

(C) The rock in which the fossilized centipedes were found was formed from mud flats that were occasionally covered by river water.

You can make several assumptions about this one, but the most relevant word in this sentence is "ocassionally", so you can say that this option actually strengthens the argument by saying that MOST of the time the land sorrounded by the mud flats was not covered by water. - Incorrect

(D) Fossils of the earliest land-dwelling animals that had previously been identified were found in rock that did not contain fossilized remains of water-dwelling animals.

Now we have something. Previous discoveries of the earliest land-dwelling animals did not contain fossilized remains of water-dwelling animals, so this options makes us doubt by stating that this discovery has a new trait (rock that also contained remains of animals known to be water-dwelling). If we have new information, why are we concluding that these fossilized centipedes were also land-dwellers? - Correct

(E) Fossils of spiders with respiratory systems adapted only to breathing air were found in the same rock as the centipede fossils.

Fossils of animals with respiratory systems found along the centipede fossils strengthen our conclusion. Incorrect
avatar
shrgmat
Joined: 11 Nov 2020
Last visit: 25 Dec 2021
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 82
Posts: 44
Kudos: 15
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
For those proponents of pre-thinking, this is the perfect Qn. No amount of pre-thinking can solve this. Instead, you waste time and worse, you are pre-inclined to a certain answer without even considering all the options.
I am really surprised at the number of proponents of that tactic.

And this is not a difficult qn at all. But, I guess people fell for it because it doesn't really fall into any of the "patterns" of Gmat. I got it right easily.
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,727
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,727
Kudos: 2,166
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
broall
Paleontologists have discovered fossils of centipedes that are 414 million years old. These fossils are at least 20 million years older than the earliest land-dwelling animals previously identified. The paleontologists are confident that these centipedes lived on land, even though the fossilized centipedes were discovered in rock that also contained fossilized remains of animals known to be water-dwelling.

The paleontologists' view would be LEAST supported by the truth of which one of the following?

(A) The legs of the fossilized centipedes were particularly suited to being a means of locomotion on land.

(B) All of the centipedes that had previously been discovered were land dwellers.

(C) The rock in which the fossilized centipedes were found was formed from mud flats that were occasionally covered by river water.

(D) Fossils of the earliest land-dwelling animals that had previously been identified were found in rock that did not contain fossilized remains of water-dwelling animals.

(E) Fossils of spiders with respiratory systems adapted only to breathing air were found in the same rock as the centipede fossils.

Source: LSAT
The underlined part of the sentence in the passage is what paleontologists believe. Anythings against that belief would not support their view. If one understands the passage the part in italics is probably a hint(only because of the way choices are present).
Have highlighted text in red and green to show which ones support or which one does not/least.

shrgmat
You are right about prethinking in this question but what matters is that whether we know various methods to solve questions.

Answer D.
User avatar
YashYashkratos
Joined: 27 Nov 2022
Last visit: 11 Jul 2025
Posts: 88
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Posts: 88
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A) strengthens
B) strengthens
C) weak weakener- use of the word occasionally and the fact we know nothing about formation of rocks in general and what this information really proves.

D) Correct- Remains of water dwelling animals are not usual thus supporting an argument that weakens the conclusion.

E) strengthens
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,437
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,437
Kudos: 953
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7349 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts