Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 06:37 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 06:37
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
705-805 (Hard)|   Strengthen|      
User avatar
GMATPill
User avatar
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Last visit: 17 Sep 2020
Posts: 2,260
Own Kudos:
3,851
 [17]
Given Kudos: 8
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,260
Kudos: 3,851
 [17]
Plastic beverage containers manufactured from 18 Sep 2013, 13:48
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (02:30) correct 45% (02:36) wrong based on 786 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Plastic beverage containers manufactured from Peter's Packaging Company use a degradable bonding agent (ie cornstarch) to bind together smaller bits of plastic in creating one partially degradable plastic container. On the other hand, plastic beverage containers from Kepsi Packaging are manufactured without binding small bits of plastic together and without using any kind of degradable bonding agent. Managers at Peter's Packaging Company boasted that no less plastic refuse per container is produced when its containers are discarded than when comparable non-biodegradable containers from Kepsi are discarded.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument above?

(A) Many consumers are ecology-minded and prefer to buy a product sold in partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers rather than in nonbiodegradable containers, even if the price is higher.

(B) The partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers are made with more plastic than comparable nonbiodegradable ones in order to compensate for the weakening effect of the bonding agents.

(C) Both partially biodegradable and non-biodegradable plastic beverage containers can be crushed completely flat by refuse compactors.

(D) Technological problems with recycling currently prevent the reuse as food or beverage containers of the plastic from either type of plastic beverage container.

(E) The manufacturing process for partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers results in less plastic waste than the manufacturing process for non-biodegradable plastic beverage containers.


Original Source: Practice Pill Platform
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
B
Most Helpful Reply
avatar
prasun9
avatar
Joined: 14 Feb 2013
Last visit: 06 May 2016
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
505
 [12]
Given Kudos: 18
Status:Oh GMAT ! I give you one more shot :)
Location: United States (MI)
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT 1: 580 Q44 V28
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V34
GPA: 3.5
WE:Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT 2: 690 Q49 V34
Posts: 61
Kudos: 505
 [12]
Plastic beverage containers manufactured from 23 Sep 2013, 08:23
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATPill
Plastic beverage containers manufactured from Peter's Packaging Company use a degradable bonding agent (ie cornstarch) to bind together smaller bits of plastic in creating one partially degradable plastic container. On the other hand, plastic beverage containers from Kepsi Packaging are manufactured without binding small bits of plastic together and without using any kind of degradable bonding agent. Managers at Peter's Packaging Company boasted that no less plastic refuse per container is produced when its containers are discarded than when comparable non-biodegradable containers from Kepsi are discarded.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument above?

(A) Many consumers are ecology-minded and prefer to buy a product sold in partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers rather than in nonbiodegradable containers, even if the price is higher.

(B) The partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers are made with more plastic than comparable nonbiodegradable ones in order to compensate for the weakening effect of the bonding agents.

(C) Both partially biodegradable and non-biodegradable plastic beverage containers can be crushed completely flat by refuse compactors.

(D) Technological problems with recycling currently prevent the reuse as food or beverage containers of the plastic from either type of plastic beverage container.

(E) The manufacturing process for partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers results in less plastic waste than the manufacturing process for non-biodegradable plastic beverage containers.
Show more

What is the source of this CR. The word that tripped me off was boasted. If I use a different manufacturing process than the rest of the industry then it must be for achieving some benefit. If I don't get any benefit out of it then how and why am I supposed to boast about it. Seems like a very stupid thing to do.
It's like paying extra for an electric powered car and then boasting that I use no less fuel than a gasoline powered car.

If the word boasted is changed to a more appropriate term then option B might be correct.
General Discussion
User avatar
StormedBrain
User avatar
Joined: 10 Aug 2013
Last visit: 17 Mar 2014
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
26
 [1]
Given Kudos: 17
Posts: 13
Kudos: 26
 [1]
Plastic beverage containers manufactured from 18 Sep 2013, 21:30
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Choice A,C,D can be eliminated easily as they don't mention quantity of discards.

Choice B and E do mention quantity of discarded waste but E mention manufacturing process.

So ans should be B.

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
animanga008
avatar
Joined: 02 Apr 2013
Last visit: 24 Jan 2017
Posts: 40
Own Kudos:
8
Given Kudos: 26
Concentration: General Management, Technology
Schools: Foster '18 (D) McCombs '18 (II) Anderson '18 (S) Marshall '18 (II) W. P. Carey Arizona State '18 (A)
GPA: 3
WE:Science (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: Foster '18 (D) McCombs '18 (II) Anderson '18 (S) Marshall '18 (II) W. P. Carey Arizona State '18 (A)
Posts: 40
Kudos: 8
Plastic beverage containers manufactured from 19 Sep 2013, 23:52
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATPill
Plastic beverage containers manufactured from Peter's Packaging Company use a degradable bonding agent (ie cornstarch) to bind together smaller bits of plastic in creating one partially degradable plastic container. On the other hand, plastic beverage containers from Kepsi Packaging are manufactured without binding small bits of plastic together and without using any kind of degradable bonding agent. Managers at Peter's Packaging Company boasted that no less plastic refuse per container is produced when its containers are discarded than when comparable non-biodegradable containers from Kepsi are discarded.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument above?

(A) Many consumers are ecology-minded and prefer to buy a product sold in partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers rather than in nonbiodegradable containers, even if the price is higher.

(B) The partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers are made with more plastic than comparable nonbiodegradable ones in order to compensate for the weakening effect of the bonding agents.

(C) Both partially biodegradable and non-biodegradable plastic beverage containers can be crushed completely flat by refuse compactors.

(D) Technological problems with recycling currently prevent the reuse as food or beverage containers of the plastic from either type of plastic beverage container.

(E) The manufacturing process for partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers results in less plastic waste than the manufacturing process for non-biodegradable plastic beverage containers.

Show more

I didn't get what the question was trying to say. What does it mean "no less plastic?" When you recycle this biodegradable plastic, you are processing just as much, if not more, plastic than a normal bottle? So what am I looking for?
User avatar
pqhai
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Last visit: 26 Nov 2015
Posts: 864
Own Kudos:
8,939
 [4]
Given Kudos: 123
Location: United States
Posts: 864
Kudos: 8,939
 [4]
Plastic beverage containers manufactured from 20 Sep 2013, 22:01
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
animanga008
GMATPill
Plastic beverage containers manufactured from Peter's Packaging Company use a degradable bonding agent (ie cornstarch) to bind together smaller bits of plastic in creating one partially degradable plastic container. On the other hand, plastic beverage containers from Kepsi Packaging are manufactured without binding small bits of plastic together and without using any kind of degradable bonding agent. Managers at Peter's Packaging Company boasted that no less plastic refuse per container is produced when its containers are discarded than when comparable non-biodegradable containers from Kepsi are discarded.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument above?

(A) Many consumers are ecology-minded and prefer to buy a product sold in partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers rather than in nonbiodegradable containers, even if the price is higher.

(B) The partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers are made with more plastic than comparable nonbiodegradable ones in order to compensate for the weakening effect of the bonding agents.

(C) Both partially biodegradable and non-biodegradable plastic beverage containers can be crushed completely flat by refuse compactors.

(D) Technological problems with recycling currently prevent the reuse as food or beverage containers of the plastic from either type of plastic beverage container.

(E) The manufacturing process for partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers results in less plastic waste than the manufacturing process for non-biodegradable plastic beverage containers.


I didn't get what the question was trying to say. What does it mean "no less plastic?" When you recycle this biodegradable plastic, you are processing just as much, if not more, plastic than a normal bottle? So what am I looking for?
Show more

Hi animanga008

The idea of the question is: a beverage container used degradable bonding agent + smaller bits of plastic ==> create partially degradable plastic container. Thus, the amount of plastic refuse should be less than that of non-degradable plastic beverage container that used 100% plastic bits.

The Managers at Peter's Packaging Company, however, said that no less plastic refuse per container is produced ==> they mean the amount of plastic refuse was NOT decreased even the container does not have 100% plastic bits.

B is correct by showing that, the biodegradable agent is very weak ==> to create a strong container, the company has to use more plastic bits ==> the result is the company CAN"T reduce the amount of plastic refuse.

Hope it helps.
avatar
superblizz
avatar
Joined: 12 Sep 2013
Last visit: 11 Feb 2014
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Plastic beverage containers manufactured from 23 Sep 2013, 13:48
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
What is the source of this CR. The word that tripped me off was boasted. If I use a different manufacturing process than the rest of the industry then it must be for achieving some benefit. If I don't get any benefit out of it then how and why am I supposed to boast about it. Seems like a very stupid thing to do.
It's like paying extra for an electric powered car and then boasting that I use no less fuel than a gasoline powered car.

If the word boasted is changed to a more appropriate term then option B might be correct.
Show more

I agree. This seemed like a poorly worded argument. E was the only answer provided some kind of added benefit for using this process even though there wasn't less plastic refuse per container. B seems like scope creep to me. Where did weaking effects of the bonding agents come into play?

With that said, I get that E also seems redundant and confusing as what are the differences between "refuse" and "waste"?
User avatar
plumber250
User avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Last visit: 21 Dec 2015
Posts: 213
Own Kudos:
972
Given Kudos: 4
Schools: LBS '14 (A$)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Schools: LBS '14 (A$)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Posts: 213
Kudos: 972
Plastic beverage containers manufactured from 24 Sep 2013, 10:08
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
prasun9
GMATPill
Plastic beverage containers manufactured from Peter's Packaging Company use a degradable bonding agent (ie cornstarch) to bind together smaller bits of plastic in creating one partially degradable plastic container. On the other hand, plastic beverage containers from Kepsi Packaging are manufactured without binding small bits of plastic together and without using any kind of degradable bonding agent. Managers at Peter's Packaging Company boasted that no less plastic refuse per container is produced when its containers are discarded than when comparable non-biodegradable containers from Kepsi are discarded.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument above?

(A) Many consumers are ecology-minded and prefer to buy a product sold in partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers rather than in nonbiodegradable containers, even if the price is higher.

(B) The partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers are made with more plastic than comparable nonbiodegradable ones in order to compensate for the weakening effect of the bonding agents.

(C) Both partially biodegradable and non-biodegradable plastic beverage containers can be crushed completely flat by refuse compactors.

(D) Technological problems with recycling currently prevent the reuse as food or beverage containers of the plastic from either type of plastic beverage container.

(E) The manufacturing process for partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers results in less plastic waste than the manufacturing process for non-biodegradable plastic beverage containers.

What is the source of this CR. The word that tripped me off was boasted. If I use a different manufacturing process than the rest of the industry then it must be for achieving some benefit. If I don't get any benefit out of it then how and why am I supposed to boast about it. Seems like a very stupid thing to do.
It's like paying extra for an electric powered car and then boasting that I use no less fuel than a gasoline powered car.

If the word boasted is changed to a more appropriate term then option B might be correct.
Show more

Hi - I don't have that issue with 'boasted' - it's a word with some emotion behind it sure, but that's not de facto a problem.

All he is saying is that his product is up to scratch - as good as the rivals.

The question then asks for which bit of evidence would back him up

James
User avatar
Transcendentalist
User avatar
Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Last visit: 04 Dec 2023
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
1,068
 [2]
Given Kudos: 73
Concentration: Sustainability, Entrepreneurship
Schools: CBS '17 (M) Kellogg '17 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
WE:Business Development (Internet and New Media)
Schools: CBS '17 (M) Kellogg '17 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q50 V44
Posts: 127
Kudos: 1,068
 [2]
Plastic beverage containers manufactured from 26 Sep 2013, 01:54
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
plumber250
prasun9
GMATPill
Plastic beverage containers manufactured from Peter's Packaging Company use a degradable bonding agent (ie cornstarch) to bind together smaller bits of plastic in creating one partially degradable plastic container. On the other hand, plastic beverage containers from Kepsi Packaging are manufactured without binding small bits of plastic together and without using any kind of degradable bonding agent. Managers at Peter's Packaging Company boasted that no less plastic refuse per container is produced when its containers are discarded than when comparable non-biodegradable containers from Kepsi are discarded.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument above?

(A) Many consumers are ecology-minded and prefer to buy a product sold in partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers rather than in nonbiodegradable containers, even if the price is higher.

(B) The partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers are made with more plastic than comparable nonbiodegradable ones in order to compensate for the weakening effect of the bonding agents.

(C) Both partially biodegradable and non-biodegradable plastic beverage containers can be crushed completely flat by refuse compactors.

(D) Technological problems with recycling currently prevent the reuse as food or beverage containers of the plastic from either type of plastic beverage container.

(E) The manufacturing process for partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers results in less plastic waste than the manufacturing process for non-biodegradable plastic beverage containers.

What is the source of this CR. The word that tripped me off was boasted. If I use a different manufacturing process than the rest of the industry then it must be for achieving some benefit. If I don't get any benefit out of it then how and why am I supposed to boast about it. Seems like a very stupid thing to do.
It's like paying extra for an electric powered car and then boasting that I use no less fuel than a gasoline powered car.

If the word boasted is changed to a more appropriate term then option B might be correct.

Hi - I don't have that issue with 'boasted' - it's a word with some emotion behind it sure, but that's not de facto a problem.

All he is saying is that his product is up to scratch - as good as the rivals.

The question then asks for which bit of evidence would back him up

James
Show more

With all due respect, "boasted" does convey an awkward meaning to the statement. A partially biodegradable product that contains the same (or more) amount of plastic as a non bio degradable one is nothing to boast about IMO and definitely does not make it look like its upto scratch.

I chose B anyways.
User avatar
borntobreaktherecord
User avatar
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Last visit: 23 Jun 2014
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
5
 [1]
Given Kudos: 25
Posts: 8
Kudos: 5
 [1]
Plastic beverage containers manufactured from 04 Mar 2014, 00:05
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pqhai
animanga008
GMATPill
Plastic beverage containers manufactured from Peter's Packaging Company use a degradable bonding agent (ie cornstarch) to bind together smaller bits of plastic in creating one partially degradable plastic container. On the other hand, plastic beverage containers from Kepsi Packaging are manufactured without binding small bits of plastic together and without using any kind of degradable bonding agent. Managers at Peter's Packaging Company boasted that no less plastic refuse per container is produced when its containers are discarded than when comparable non-biodegradable containers from Kepsi are discarded.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument above?

(A) Many consumers are ecology-minded and prefer to buy a product sold in partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers rather than in nonbiodegradable containers, even if the price is higher.

(B) The partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers are made with more plastic than comparable nonbiodegradable ones in order to compensate for the weakening effect of the bonding agents.

(C) Both partially biodegradable and non-biodegradable plastic beverage containers can be crushed completely flat by refuse compactors.

(D) Technological problems with recycling currently prevent the reuse as food or beverage containers of the plastic from either type of plastic beverage container.

(E) The manufacturing process for partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers results in less plastic waste than the manufacturing process for non-biodegradable plastic beverage containers.


I didn't get what the question was trying to say. What does it mean "no less plastic?" When you recycle this biodegradable plastic, you are processing just as much, if not more, plastic than a normal bottle? So what am I looking for?

Hi animanga008

The idea of the question is: a beverage container used degradable bonding agent + smaller bits of plastic ==> create partially degradable plastic container. Thus, the amount of plastic refuse should be less than that of non-degradable plastic beverage container that used 100% plastic bits.

The Managers at Peter's Packaging Company, however, said that no less plastic refuse per container is produced ==> they mean the amount of plastic refuse was NOT decreased even the container does not have 100% plastic bits.

B is correct by showing that, the biodegradable agent is very weak ==> to create a strong container, the company has to use more plastic bits ==> the result is the company CAN"T reduce the amount of plastic refuse.

Hope it helps.
Show more

---why do you want to say "amount of Plastic refuse" rather than "amount of plastic" ..what is actually "plastic refuse" in your perspectives?
User avatar
ronr34
User avatar
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Last visit: 10 Oct 2014
Posts: 240
Own Kudos:
253
Given Kudos: 58
Posts: 240
Kudos: 253
Plastic beverage containers manufactured from 30 Jun 2014, 11:57
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Anyone care to resolve the "boasted" issue?
I agree with it.... I chose E.
User avatar
himanshujovi
User avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2014
Last visit: 29 Aug 2016
Posts: 139
Own Kudos:
77
Given Kudos: 46
Posts: 139
Kudos: 77
Plastic beverage containers manufactured from 30 Jun 2014, 23:38
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
animanga008
GMATPill
Plastic beverage containers manufactured from Peter's Packaging Company use a degradable bonding agent (ie cornstarch) to bind together smaller bits of plastic in creating one partially degradable plastic container. On the other hand, plastic beverage containers from Kepsi Packaging are manufactured without binding small bits of plastic together and without using any kind of degradable bonding agent. Managers at Peter's Packaging Company boasted that no less plastic refuse per container is produced when its containers are discarded than when comparable non-biodegradable containers from Kepsi are discarded.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument above?

(A) Many consumers are ecology-minded and prefer to buy a product sold in partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers rather than in nonbiodegradable containers, even if the price is higher.

(B) The partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers are made with more plastic than comparable nonbiodegradable ones in order to compensate for the weakening effect of the bonding agents.

(C) Both partially biodegradable and non-biodegradable plastic beverage containers can be crushed completely flat by refuse compactors.

(D) Technological problems with recycling currently prevent the reuse as food or beverage containers of the plastic from either type of plastic beverage container.

(E) The manufacturing process for partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers results in less plastic waste than the manufacturing process for non-biodegradable plastic beverage containers.


I didn't get what the question was trying to say. What does it mean "no less plastic?" When you recycle this biodegradable plastic, you are processing just as much, if not more, plastic than a normal bottle? So what am I looking for?
Show more

I have the same query. Is this wording befitting an exam of GMAT's stature ? "no less plastic?"

Secondly , from a purely logical point of view and I am going out of scope of the question - why would a company boast about not the non re-usability of its goods ?
User avatar
Temurkhon
User avatar
Joined: 23 Jan 2013
Last visit: 06 Apr 2019
Posts: 408
Own Kudos:
325
Given Kudos: 43
Schools: Cambridge'16
Schools: Cambridge'16
Posts: 408
Kudos: 325
Plastic beverage containers manufactured from 02 Jul 2014, 22:52
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think it is more Resolve the paradox or Explain the discrepancy question than typical Strengthen question
User avatar
kinjiGC
User avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2013
Last visit: 12 Oct 2025
Posts: 789
Own Kudos:
2,736
Given Kudos: 567
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Schools: Tepper '17 (M$) W.P. Carey '17 (A$) NUS '17 (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: Tepper '17 (M$) W.P. Carey '17 (A$) NUS '17 (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
Posts: 789
Kudos: 2,736
Plastic beverage containers manufactured from 20 Jul 2014, 07:30
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATPill
Plastic beverage containers manufactured from Peter's Packaging Company use a degradable bonding agent (ie cornstarch) to bind together smaller bits of plastic in creating one partially degradable plastic container. On the other hand, plastic beverage containers from Kepsi Packaging are manufactured without binding small bits of plastic together and without using any kind of degradable bonding agent. Managers at Peter's Packaging Company boasted that no less plastic refuse per container is produced when its containers are discarded than when comparable non-biodegradable containers from Kepsi are discarded.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument above?

(A) Many consumers are ecology-minded and prefer to buy a product sold in partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers rather than in nonbiodegradable containers, even if the price is higher.

(B) The partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers are made with more plastic than comparable nonbiodegradable ones in order to compensate for the weakening effect of the bonding agents.

(C) Both partially biodegradable and non-biodegradable plastic beverage containers can be crushed completely flat by refuse compactors.

(D) Technological problems with recycling currently prevent the reuse as food or beverage containers of the plastic from either type of plastic beverage container.

(E) The manufacturing process for partially biodegradable plastic beverage containers results in less plastic waste than the manufacturing process for non-biodegradable plastic beverage containers.


Original Source: Practice Pill Platform
Show more

The managers are boasting that no less plastic refuse is produced. It doesn't make sense at all, why to use partially bio-degradable plastic at all. Beats me !!!!

Though only option B make sense. Not a well formed question at all.
User avatar
chesstitans
User avatar
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Last visit: 20 Nov 2019
Posts: 963
Own Kudos:
1,936
Given Kudos: 2,561
Location: United States
Schools: Stanford '19 Carroll '19 LBS '19
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Schools: Stanford '19 Carroll '19 LBS '19
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
Posts: 963
Kudos: 1,936
Plastic beverage containers manufactured from 16 Jul 2017, 19:24
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
C is a trap, and B is 100% contrasting with E => B is the assumption.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,423
Own Kudos:
1,009
Posts: 19,423
Kudos: 1,009
Plastic beverage containers manufactured from 29 Aug 2025, 09:41
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
AbhishekP220108
501 posts
bhanu29
358 posts