Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Struggling to find the right strategies to score a 99 %ile on GMAT Focus? Riya (GMAT 715) boosted her score by 100-points in just 15 days! Discover how the right mentorship, tailored strategies, and an unwavering mindset can transform your GMAT prep.
Verbal trouble on GMAT? Fix it NOW! Join Sunita Singhvi for a focused webinar on actionable strategies to boost your Verbal score and take your performance to the next level.
GMAT Inequalities is a high-frequency topic in GMAT Quant, but many students struggle because the concepts behave differently from standard algebra. Understanding the right rules, patterns, and edge cases can significantly improve both speed and accuracy.
In Episode 3 of our GMAT Ninja Critical Reasoning series, we tackle Discrepancy, Paradox, and Explain an Oddity questions. You know the feeling: the passage gives you two facts that seem completely contradictory....
Join the special YouTube live-stream for selecting the winners of GMAT Club MBA Scholarships sponsored by Juno live. Watch who gets these coveted MBA scholarships offered by GMAT Club and Juno.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
I'm currently using Manhattan GMAT prep, and i'm sitting around Q43 (that was my last MGMAT CAT score for quant). I still have some material that I have not gone through, such as the online question banks and some challenge packages that were provided to me by my GMAT instructor.
Overall, i have improved my quant score significantly using MGMAT material. However, I'm aiming for a quant score of 45+ and therefore debating if I should purchase Math revolution for the extra boost.
I know this does not answer your question directly, but I hope someone who has used Math Revolution can chime in and share their experience.
I just started to prepare for Quant section. First, I began from DS. I heard a lot about MathRevolution Variable Approach and, after some theory, I started to solve DS from OG-15. My opinion is that - it is a good approach for "2 by 2" question types, but in general, it won't let you score more than Q35-40.
I attached a spreadsheet in which two answers are given. Second column - answers using variable approach (from MathRevolution web-site, not mine), and third one - official answers from the book. There is just first 23 of them (first 3 videos of Variable approach in practice from MathRevolution web-site), but still, you have a chance to solve DS questions using VA about 50%. And in which questions VA is a really best or at least good approach, in my opinion, just 7 out of 23.
Haven't used the course but honestly, I don't think you would require a quant prep course. The OG and the quant review should give you enough practice for Q45+ (try to get all the sub 700 questions correct). If you need additional, the gmatclubs are wonderful as well. This is more than enough material to score high in quant.
I just started to prepare for Quant section. First, I began from DS. I heard a lot about MathRevolution Variable Approach and, after some theory, I started to solve DS from OG-15. My opinion is that - it is a good approach for "2 by 2" question types, but in general, it won't let you score more than Q35-40.
I attached a spreadsheet in which two answers are given. Second column - answers using variable approach (from MathRevolution web-site, not mine), and third one - official answers from the book. There is just first 23 of them (first 3 videos of Variable approach in practice from MathRevolution web-site), but still, you have a chance to solve DS questions using VA about 50%. And in which questions VA is a really best or at least good approach, in my opinion, just 7 out of 23.
I just started to prepare for Quant section. First, I began from DS. I heard a lot about MathRevolution Variable Approach and, after some theory, I started to solve DS from OG-15. My opinion is that - it is a good approach for "2 by 2" question types, but in general, it won't let you score more than Q35-40.
I attached a spreadsheet in which two answers are given. Second column - answers using variable approach (from MathRevolution web-site, not mine), and third one - official answers from the book. There is just first 23 of them (first 3 videos of Variable approach in practice from MathRevolution web-site), but still, you have a chance to solve DS questions using VA about 50%. And in which questions VA is a really best or at least good approach, in my opinion, just 7 out of 23.
What do you think?
Show more
Hi,
Nothing against any particular approach, so I'll talk in general what one should do.
My two cents.. 1) Noone makes math Q, keeping some approach in mind. If few Q do get solved by one method, remember PROBABILITY. By probability you should be able to solve 5 Q without any approach. 5choices and 23 Q, probability of getting Correct --23/5 nearly 5Qs. 2) you should use proper method to answer. Or use logical approach to get to answer or ATLEAST home on to just two choices out of 5. Example... An equation 2x+y=7, where x and y are integers, should tell you that y is Odd and thus you can eliminate even integer as choices. 3)even if someone can answer 50% by a particular approach, an approach that has no sound reasoning, there is no way to know which 50% are those. It will be suicidal to go into exam knowing you can do only 50% correct at the max.
My advice.. Learn proper method and work on one's weak areas. Work on alternate LOGICAL methods, which have sound reasoning..
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.