BackgroundWork experience: IBM Consulting (1 year), Big4 Audit (2 years), consumer product startups (3.5 years); all progressively better roles
Extra curriculars: none to speak of
Undergrad school/major: state school, 3.4, double major finance and accounting
Other education/coursework: none
Race/nationality: white
Sex: m
StatsGMAT Score (include breakdown!): 720 (V40Q49)
Undergrad GPA: 3.4
MBA InfoGoal of MBA: PT - build out management skills to track towards executive level roles, FT - more of an open question.
Target schools: UT McCombs PT, FT - that's the question, are top 10 schools realistic?
I initially started the MBA journey targeting McCombs PT because I really like my job, it's high impact and I'm in Austin so I can continue working and get my MBA. I wanted to keep the FT option open pending my GMAT. Now that I have my GMAT score, I'm wondering if it's worth applying to reach FT programs (Haas, Ross, Fuqua, Stanford (big reach)) with the thought that career prospects from a top 10 school are substantially better. I'd be applying next cycle, first round.
With the PT program, the purpose of the MBA is more growth focused within my current company. If I was to get a FT degree I'd like to stay in CPG, but likely target roles at F500 or Series D+ startups.
So the question is, are those FT programs reasonable and, if so, am I looking at any scholarship money or should I expect to foot full tuition.
Only other disclaimer is that I could (although I'd prefer not to) take the GMAT again and pull up my quant score and try to get my overall in the 740-750 range. I'd only do this if it'd make a material change to my prospects for FT programs.