GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 19 Oct 2019, 10:22

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Proponents of the Equal Rights Amendment argue for its necessity if on

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 27 Dec 2009
Posts: 14
Proponents of the Equal Rights Amendment argue for its necessity if on  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jan 2010, 12:48
1
4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

67% (01:29) correct 33% (01:12) wrong based on 232 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Proponents of the Equal Rights Amendment argue for its necessity if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is for men with comparable jobs and work experience.


(A) if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is

(B) if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than those

(C) because average salaries for women are only considerably lower than those

(D) if only as a result of the fact that salaries for women are still considerably lower than those

(E) if only because women's average salaries are still considerably lower than it is
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 25 Jun 2009
Posts: 231
Re: Proponents of the Equal Rights Amendment argue for its necessity if on  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jan 2010, 15:32
2
samrand wrote:
Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its necessity if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is for men with comparable jobs and work experience.
1.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is
2.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
3.because average salaries for women are only considerably lower than those
4.if only as a result of the fact that salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
5.if only because women's average salaries are still considerably lowerh than it is

GMAT 800:B but I think this wrong,What do you think?



I think its right,

1.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is --usage of IT IS is making a pronoun and comparison error here, average salaries for women is being compared with men' salary but with wrong pronoun
2.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than those --Correct
3.because average salaries for women are only considerably lower than those --removal of If only changes the meaning of the sentence
4.if only as a result of the fact that salaries for women are still considerably lower than those --As as result of the fact is making the sentence wordy
5.if only because women's average salaries are still considerably lowerh than it is --wrong way of comparison between Men's Salary and Women's Salary.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Mar 2012
Posts: 42
Schools: Tepper '15 (WL)
Re: Proponents of the Equal Rights Amendment argue for its necessity if on  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jul 2012, 12:53
http://www.englishforums.com/English/Be ... g/post.htm

Apparently it is idiomatic. I have never heard anyone use "if only because" in a sentence though.
Manhattan Prep Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 30 Apr 2012
Posts: 787
Re: Proponents of the Equal Rights Amendment argue for its necessity if on  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Dec 2013, 18:41
I'm with cipher on this one...nice explanation. I'll make a quick comment here about option 3.

3.because average salaries for women are only considerably lower than those --removal of If only changes the meaning of the sentence

I agree that there is a meaning difference when changing "if only" with "because", but the meaning is still very logical with "because". There is a bigger meaning issue with "only" in the sentence. Adding "only" in the sentence creates illogical meaning. Women's salaries are "only" lower than those for men? Does that mean that their wages are higher than those of aliens? Robots? That word "only" ruins the meaning of the sentence.

KW
_________________
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: enjoying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 5100
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Proponents of the Equal Rights Amendment argue for its necessity if on  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Dec 2013, 22:02
2
1
Let me add yet another dimension to this tangle. Normally the expression ‘if only” is used to express a subjunctive desire or wish as in --- If only I were Bill Gates, I would donate half my earnings to charity, --- or --If only we had the means to control the rain gods, we would not suffer drought etc, etc; Mostly these are hypothetical fancying and unachievable in the normal course.

But in the context, four of the choices carry this phrase, which IMO is weird; unfortunately, the only other choice 3 is still more muddied because of the improper placement of the restrictive adverbial modifier ‘only’. For choice 3 to mean something worthwhile, we need to drop the word ‘only’ outright.

Among the rest of the four choices, 1 and 5 can be easily dropped on subject- pronoun number disagreement alone. Between 2 and 4, the construction is convoluted in choice 4, leaving only 2 as the best of the available choices. So one may see why we are forced to take B as somewhat correct.
_________________
Are you stuck around 630? If you can't make out how to pole-vault over the 630-barrier, you can do so with my one-to-one lessons. (+919884544509)
Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Posts: 662
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Proponents of the Equal Rights Amendment argue for its necessity if on  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Mar 2017, 08:46
Proponents of the equal rights amendment argue for its necessity if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is for men with comparable jobs and work experience.
1.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is
Subject Verb agreement issue

2.if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
Correct answer,with correct meaning

3.because average salaries for women are only considerably lower than those
are only makes the sentence confusing because the meaning is altered.

4.if only as a result of the fact that salaries for women are still considerably lower than those
Change in meaning

5.if only because women's average salaries are still considerably lowerh than it is
Subject Verb Agreement issue
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 16 Apr 2018
Posts: 81
Re: Proponents of the Equal Rights Amendment argue for its necessity if on  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Aug 2018, 10:41
Between C and D.

D as it conveys the intended meaning.

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 03 Sep 2017
Posts: 10
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q47 V42
GPA: 3.4
Re: Proponents of the Equal Rights Amendment argue for its necessity if on  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Aug 2018, 11:50
Between b and d - but I would choose b because it's more concise, hence more appropriate

Posted from my mobile device
Board of Directors
User avatar
D
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 4773
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE: Business Development (Commercial Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Proponents of the Equal Rights Amendment argue for its necessity if on  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Aug 2018, 12:13
Bunuel wrote:
Proponents of the Equal Rights Amendment argue for its necessity if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is for men with comparable jobs and work experience.


(A) if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is

(B) if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than those

(C) because average salaries for women are only considerably lower than those

(D) if only as a result of the fact that salaries for women are still considerably lower than those

(E) if only because women's average salaries are still considerably lower than it is


+1 for (B)

Proponents of the Equal Rights Amendment argue for its necessity if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than those (average salaries) for men with comparable jobs and work experience.
_________________
Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58445
Re: Proponents of the Equal Rights Amendment argue for its necessity if on  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2018, 01:01
Bunuel wrote:
Proponents of the Equal Rights Amendment argue for its necessity if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is for men with comparable jobs and work experience.


(A) if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is

(B) if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than those

(C) because average salaries for women are only considerably lower than those

(D) if only as a result of the fact that salaries for women are still considerably lower than those

(E) if only because women's average salaries are still considerably lower than it is


KAPLAN OFFICIAL EXPLANATION:



The sentence compares salaries to salaries, but it takes a shortcut toward the end and refers back to salaries as it. Salaries are plural and it is singular, so (A) and (E) are out of consideration. Of the remaining options, (C) stands out as significantly different, but by replacing if only with because and by moving only so that it describes lower, (C) actually contradicts the meaning of the original sentence. Finally, because in (B) is far more succinct than as a result of the fact that in (D). So, (B) it is.
_________________
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 22 Jul 2018
Posts: 14
Location: India
Schools: ISB '21, Foster '22
GRE 1: Q165 V160
Re: Proponents of the Equal Rights Amendment argue for its necessity if on  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2018, 14:01
Bunuel wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Proponents of the Equal Rights Amendment argue for its necessity if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is for men with comparable jobs and work experience.


(A) if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than it is

(B) if only because average salaries for women are still considerably lower than those

(C) because average salaries for women are only considerably lower than those

(D) if only as a result of the fact that salaries for women are still considerably lower than those

(E) if only because women's average salaries are still considerably lower than it is


KAPLAN OFFICIAL EXPLANATION:



The sentence compares salaries to salaries, but it takes a shortcut toward the end and refers back to salaries as it. Salaries are plural and it is singular, so (A) and (E) are out of consideration. Of the remaining options, (C) stands out as significantly different, but by replacing if only with because and by moving only so that it describes lower, (C) actually contradicts the meaning of the original sentence. Finally, because in (B) is far more succinct than as a result of the fact that in (D). So, (B) it is.


Hello Bunuel
I can't seem to quite comprehend what function the if only serves in this sentence and how the meaning is affected if it is removed.
Could you please help me out?

Thank You
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Proponents of the Equal Rights Amendment argue for its necessity if on   [#permalink] 23 Aug 2018, 14:01
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Proponents of the Equal Rights Amendment argue for its necessity if on

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne