Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

0 boys and 3 girls = 4 possibilities ( 4c3 )
1 boy and 2 girls = 12 possibilities ( no siblings should be in the team : 4 * 3c2 )
2 boys and 1 girl = 12 possibilities ( no siblings should be in the team : 4c2 *2c1 )
3 boys and 0 girls = 4 possibilities ( 4c3 )

This is the way I was thinking about it, but can someone explain why it is wrong:

For the first member, there are 8 ways to select them.

For the second member, we can select from the remaining 7 people, but not the sibling of the first, so that leaves us with selecting from 6 people

For the final member, choose from remaining 5-1=4 people

Therefore 8x6x4

Let the brothers be A,B,C,D and the sisters be E,F,G,H.

With your method, you will have committees like
ABF, AFB, BAF,...... Basically, you will end up counting committees (that have the same members) multiple times.

This is the way I was thinking about it, but can someone explain why it is wrong:

For the first member, there are 8 ways to select them.

For the second member, we can select from the remaining 7 people, but not the sibling of the first, so that leaves us with selecting from 6 people

For the final member, choose from remaining 5-1=4 people

Therefore 8x6x4

Let the brothers be A,B,C,D and the sisters be E,F,G,H.

With your method, you will have committees like ABF, AFB, BAF,...... Basically, you will end up counting committees (that have the same members) multiple times.

Thanks, jbs. For this type of question, does AFB and ABF not count as a "different" committee ?

Also, if I were to go along my approach, how would I be able to remedy it to come up with the proper answer ?

They asked for the committee as a whole. So yes, for this type of question, AFB and ABF do not count as different committees. If they had said something w.r.t positioning , the problem would have changed.

Consider 3 members A,B & C.

Among themselves, A,B & C can form the following similar committees:

ABC
ACB
BAC
BCA
CAB
CBA

i.e: each group of 3 members can form 6 committees in which they repeat together but in different positions.

Therefore, in general, to correct your approach, divide your answer with the number of possible repetitions i.e. 6.

Hope this helps.

p.s: Your approach would have been correct in problems where positioning matters.

Last edited by jbs on 12 Nov 2007, 19:43, edited 1 time in total.

There are four distinct pairs of brothers and sisters. In how many ways can a committee of 3 be formed and NOT have siblings in it?

A. 8 B. 24 C. 32 D. 56 E. 80

another approach.. someone please correct me if my logic is incorrect

total combinations - one pair of siblings

total = 8C3
1 pr of siblings = 4C2 * 6C1
4C2 = possible # of selecting a pair of siblings
6C1 = from the 6 left after pair is chosen, # of selecting the third

There are four distinct pairs of brothers and sisters. In how many ways can a committee of 3 be formed and NOT have siblings in it?

A. 8 B. 24 C. 32 D. 56 E. 80

another approach.. someone please correct me if my logic is incorrect

total combinations - one pair of siblings

total = 8C3 1 pr of siblings = 4C2 * 6C1 4C2 = possible # of selecting a pair of siblings 6C1 = from the 6 left after pair is chosen, # of selecting the third

beckee, why 4C2 and 6C1 ? I mean, can you break down how you came up with those #s ?

4C2*6C1 is the total number of combinations with 2 siblings.

There are 3 people in each group.
4C2 is the number of sibling combinations for the first 2 spots in the group. Since we are looking for a pair instead of individual brothers & sisters, we are selecting from 4 instead of 8.
6C1 will fill the final spot (only 6 left here since we filled the first 2 spots with siblings).

there are eight possible choices for the first committee member

for the second committee member, we can't have the first person's sibling on the team so we have six possible choices for the second committee member

for the third committee member we can't have either of the first two chosen members's siblings, so we have four possible choices for the third committee member

so the total num of ways = 8*6*4

Ah ha ! I knew I couldnt have been the only person who thought of it like this !

Scroll up to view my posts, along with jbs'. We had a mini conversation about how to make this approach work, and why it wouldnt work as 8 x 6 x 4

beckee, why 4C2 and 6C1 ? I mean, can you break down how you came up with those #s ?

4C2*6C1 is the total number of combinations with 2 siblings.

There are 3 people in each group. 4C2 is the number of sibling combinations for the first 2 spots in the group. Since we are looking for a pair instead of individual brothers & sisters, we are selecting from 4 instead of 8. 6C1 will fill the final spot (only 6 left here since we filled the first 2 spots with siblings).

8C3 - 4C2*6C1 = 32

Isn't 8c3 - 4c2* 6c1 = 56 - 6*6 = 56-36= 24? How is the OA 32???

beckee, why 4C2 and 6C1 ? I mean, can you break down how you came up with those #s ?

4C2*6C1 is the total number of combinations with 2 siblings.

There are 3 people in each group. 4C2 is the number of sibling combinations for the first 2 spots in the group. Since we are looking for a pair instead of individual brothers & sisters, we are selecting from 4 instead of 8. 6C1 will fill the final spot (only 6 left here since we filled the first 2 spots with siblings).

8C3 - 4C2*6C1 = 32

Isn't 8c3 - 4c2* 6c1 = 56 - 6*6 = 56-36= 24? How is the OA 32???

Total possibilities excluding consideration for the restrictions : 8C3 = 8!/[3!x5!] = 8x7x6/3x2 = 56

The exluded possibilities due to the restriction (i.e. no sibiling in the 3-members committee ):

6 possible people, we choose 1 of them. 6C1=6 corresponding possibilities for each pair (the 3rd member) = 6

we can do this with each pair of the twins. total pairs of siblings = 4 (Unfavorable pairs)(6C1) So it is 4x6 = 24

ANSWER = total possibilities - restricted possibilities = 56 - 24 = 32 ANSWER: C

excellent answer. small elaboration above.

I like this explanation but i am hung up on "6 possible people, we choose 1 of them"

if there are 8 people total and you want to form 3 person committees from 4 pairs of siblings who cannot be together in a committee and if you have you have 6 possible people (i'm assuming you've picked 1 person and the person's sibling is excluded) shouldn't we be choosing 2 people out of the 6 people that are left to form the 3 person committee?

Please go really slowly, i am far from a math whiz.