Author 
Message 
Manager
Joined: 02 Aug 2007
Posts: 145

PS  Combinatorics (m02q05) [#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Nov 2007, 18:36
8
This post was BOOKMARKED
This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please repost it in the respective forum. There are four distinct pairs of brothers and sisters. In how many ways can a committee of 3 be formed and NOT have siblings in it? A. 8 B. 24 C. 32 D. 56 E. 80 Source: GMAT Club Tests  hardest GMAT questions



Director
Joined: 13 Dec 2006
Posts: 512
Location: Indonesia

Answer 24
4c2 * 2c1 + 4c2* 2c1 (or 4* 3c2) = 24
Amar



Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 108

1
This post received KUDOS
Answer C 32
The committee could have
0 boys and 3 girls = 4 possibilities ( 4c3 )
1 boy and 2 girls = 12 possibilities ( no siblings should be in the team : 4 * 3c2 )
2 boys and 1 girl = 12 possibilities ( no siblings should be in the team : 4c2 *2c1 )
3 boys and 0 girls = 4 possibilities ( 4c3 )
Therefore 4+12+12+4=32 possible teams.



Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 108

pmenon wrote: This is the way I was thinking about it, but can someone explain why it is wrong:
For the first member, there are 8 ways to select them.
For the second member, we can select from the remaining 7 people, but not the sibling of the first, so that leaves us with selecting from 6 people
For the final member, choose from remaining 51=4 people
Therefore 8x6x4
Let the brothers be A,B,C,D and the sisters be E,F,G,H.
With your method, you will have committees like
ABF, AFB, BAF,...... Basically, you will end up counting committees (that have the same members) multiple times.



Manager
Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 108

pmenon wrote: jbs wrote: pmenon wrote: This is the way I was thinking about it, but can someone explain why it is wrong:
For the first member, there are 8 ways to select them.
For the second member, we can select from the remaining 7 people, but not the sibling of the first, so that leaves us with selecting from 6 people
For the final member, choose from remaining 51=4 people
Therefore 8x6x4 Let the brothers be A,B,C,D and the sisters be E,F,G,H. With your method, you will have committees like ABF, AFB, BAF,...... Basically, you will end up counting committees (that have the same members) multiple times. Thanks, jbs. For this type of question, does AFB and ABF not count as a "different" committee ? Also, if I were to go along my approach, how would I be able to remedy it to come up with the proper answer ?
They asked for the committee as a whole. So yes, for this type of question, AFB and ABF do not count as different committees. If they had said something w.r.t positioning , the problem would have changed.
Consider 3 members A,B & C.
Among themselves, A,B & C can form the following similar committees:
ABC
ACB
BAC
BCA
CAB
CBA
i.e: each group of 3 members can form 6 committees in which they repeat together but in different positions.
Therefore, in general, to correct your approach, divide your answer with the number of possible repetitions i.e. 6.
Hope this helps.
p.s: Your approach would have been correct in problems where positioning matters.
Last edited by jbs on 12 Nov 2007, 20:43, edited 1 time in total.



Director
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 915

Re: PS  Combinatorics [#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Nov 2007, 20:46
1
This post received KUDOS
yuefei wrote: There are four distinct pairs of brothers and sisters. In how many ways can a committee of 3 be formed and NOT have siblings in it?
A. 8 B. 24 C. 32 D. 56 E. 80
another approach.. someone please correct me if my logic is incorrect
total combinations  one pair of siblings
total = 8C3
1 pr of siblings = 4C2 * 6C1
4C2 = possible # of selecting a pair of siblings
6C1 = from the 6 left after pair is chosen, # of selecting the third
8C3  (4C2 * 6C1)
56  4*6 = 56  24 = 32 (answer C)



SVP
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1559

Re: PS  Combinatorics [#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Nov 2007, 10:46
beckee529 wrote: yuefei wrote: There are four distinct pairs of brothers and sisters. In how many ways can a committee of 3 be formed and NOT have siblings in it?
A. 8 B. 24 C. 32 D. 56 E. 80 another approach.. someone please correct me if my logic is incorrect total combinations  one pair of siblings total = 8C3 1 pr of siblings = 4C2 * 6C1 4C2 = possible # of selecting a pair of siblings 6C1 = from the 6 left after pair is chosen, # of selecting the third 8C3  (4C2 * 6C1) 56  4*6 = 56  24 = 32 (answer C)
beckee, why 4C2 and 6C1 ? I mean, can you break down how you came up with those #s ?



Manager
Joined: 02 Aug 2007
Posts: 145

Re: PS  Combinatorics [#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Nov 2007, 11:14
pmenon wrote: beckee, why 4C2 and 6C1 ? I mean, can you break down how you came up with those #s ?
4C2*6C1 is the total number of combinations with 2 siblings.
There are 3 people in each group.
4C2 is the number of sibling combinations for the first 2 spots in the group. Since we are looking for a pair instead of individual brothers & sisters, we are selecting from 4 instead of 8.
6C1 will fill the final spot (only 6 left here since we filled the first 2 spots with siblings).
8C3  4C2*6C1 = 32



SVP
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1559

jimjohn wrote: can someone plz help explain what i did wrong?
there are eight possible choices for the first committee member
for the second committee member, we can't have the first person's sibling on the team so we have six possible choices for the second committee member
for the third committee member we can't have either of the first two chosen members's siblings, so we have four possible choices for the third committee member
so the total num of ways = 8*6*4
Ah ha ! I knew I couldnt have been the only person who thought of it like this !
Scroll up to view my posts, along with jbs'. We had a mini conversation about how to make this approach work, and why it wouldnt work as 8 x 6 x 4



Intern
Joined: 25 Jul 2007
Posts: 2

I understand that there are 4 pairs of siblings, but how can 4C2 = 4? Am I missing something here?



Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2007
Posts: 182

Re: PS  Combinatorics [#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Nov 2007, 07:19
yuefei wrote: pmenon wrote: beckee, why 4C2 and 6C1 ? I mean, can you break down how you came up with those #s ? 4C2*6C1 is the total number of combinations with 2 siblings. There are 3 people in each group. 4C2 is the number of sibling combinations for the first 2 spots in the group. Since we are looking for a pair instead of individual brothers & sisters, we are selecting from 4 instead of 8. 6C1 will fill the final spot (only 6 left here since we filled the first 2 spots with siblings). 8C3  4C2*6C1 = 32
Isn't 8c3  4c2* 6c1 = 56  6*6 = 5636= 24? How is the OA 32???



SVP
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1885

Re: PS  Combinatorics [#permalink]
Show Tags
14 Nov 2007, 09:32
Skewed wrote: yuefei wrote: pmenon wrote: beckee, why 4C2 and 6C1 ? I mean, can you break down how you came up with those #s ? 4C2*6C1 is the total number of combinations with 2 siblings. There are 3 people in each group. 4C2 is the number of sibling combinations for the first 2 spots in the group. Since we are looking for a pair instead of individual brothers & sisters, we are selecting from 4 instead of 8. 6C1 will fill the final spot (only 6 left here since we filled the first 2 spots with siblings). 8C3  4C2*6C1 = 32 Isn't 8c3  4c2* 6c1 = 56  6*6 = 5636= 24? How is the OA 32???
It should be 8C3  4C1*6C1
4C1 because you're picking one pair from 4 pairs.



Director
Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 591
Location: Kuwait

7
This post received KUDOS
1
This post was BOOKMARKED
Total possibilities excluding consideration for the restrictions :
8C3 = 8!/[3!x5!] = 8x7x6/3x2 = 56
The exluded possibilities due to the restriction (i.e. no sibiling in the 3members committee ):
total pairs of sibilings = 4
corresponding possibilities for each pair (the 3rd member) = 6
So it is 4x6 = 24
ANSWER = total possibilities  restricted possibilities = 56  24 = 32 ANSWER: C



CEO
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2739
Location: New York City

Mishari wrote: Total possibilities excluding consideration for the restrictions : 8C3 = 8!/[3!x5!] = 8x7x6/3x2 = 56
The exluded possibilities due to the restriction (i.e. no sibiling in the 3members committee ):
6 possible people, we choose 1 of them. 6C1=6 corresponding possibilities for each pair (the 3rd member) = 6
we can do this with each pair of the twins. total pairs of siblings = 4 (Unfavorable pairs)(6C1) So it is 4x6 = 24
ANSWER = total possibilities  restricted possibilities = 56  24 = 32 ANSWER: C
excellent answer.
small elaboration above.



CEO
Joined: 17 Nov 2007
Posts: 3583
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Other
Schools: Chicago (Booth)  Class of 2011

C.
4C3*2C1*2C1*2C1=4*2^3=32
4C3  3 pairs from 4 pairs.
2C1  changing between brother and sister in each pair.



SVP
Joined: 07 Nov 2007
Posts: 1800
Location: New York

Re: PS  Combinatorics [#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Aug 2008, 14:23
1
This post was BOOKMARKED
yuefei wrote: There are four distinct pairs of brothers and sisters. In how many ways can a committee of 3 be formed and NOT have siblings in it?
A. 8 B. 24 C. 32 D. 56 E. 80 = 8C1*6C1*4C1/3! = 32
_________________
Your attitude determines your altitude Smiling wins more friends than frowning



Manager
Joined: 22 Jul 2008
Posts: 151

Re: PS  Combinatorics [#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Aug 2008, 14:30
4 C 3 * 2 C 1 * 2 C 1 * 2 C 1 = 4*2*2*2 = 32



Intern
Joined: 10 Oct 2006
Posts: 3

Re: PS  Combinatorics (m02q05) [#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Aug 2009, 12:34
xALIx wrote: Well put!! bmwhype2 wrote: Mishari wrote: Total possibilities excluding consideration for the restrictions : 8C3 = 8!/[3!x5!] = 8x7x6/3x2 = 56
The exluded possibilities due to the restriction (i.e. no sibiling in the 3members committee ):
6 possible people, we choose 1 of them. 6C1=6 corresponding possibilities for each pair (the 3rd member) = 6
we can do this with each pair of the twins. total pairs of siblings = 4 (Unfavorable pairs)(6C1) So it is 4x6 = 24
ANSWER = total possibilities  restricted possibilities = 56  24 = 32 ANSWER: C excellent answer. small elaboration above. I like this explanation but i am hung up on "6 possible people, we choose 1 of them" if there are 8 people total and you want to form 3 person committees from 4 pairs of siblings who cannot be together in a committee and if you have you have 6 possible people (i'm assuming you've picked 1 person and the person's sibling is excluded) shouldn't we be choosing 2 people out of the 6 people that are left to form the 3 person committee? Please go really slowly, i am far from a math whiz.



Intern
Joined: 10 Oct 2006
Posts: 3

Re: PS  Combinatorics (m02q05) [#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Aug 2009, 12:47
Nevermind i got it: The operating phrase here "excluded possibilities!"
in otherwords what cannot be.
The first two people are indeed siblings of whom you ignore to grab someone else from the the remaining six to form a committee that cannot be.
subtracting the the committees that cannot be from the sum of those that can and cannot be leaves you with those that can be.
I hate that it take me so stinking long to figure these out!
Thanks



Manager
Joined: 14 Aug 2009
Posts: 123

8
This post received KUDOS
walker wrote: C.
4C3*2C1*2C1*2C1=4*2^3=32 4C3  3 pairs from 4 pairs. 2C1  changing between brother and sister in each pair. Right. same as mine. A(_ _) B(_ _) C(_ _) D(_ _) from A B C D, choose 3, 4C3 from the chosen 3, pick one from each 2C1*2C1*2C1 in total: 4C3*2C1*2C1*2C1=32
_________________
Kudos me if my reply helps!







Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 40 posts ]




