It is currently 22 Feb 2018, 09:05

TODAY:

MIT Sloan Releasing 1st Wave of Interview Invites - Join GMATClub CHAT for Live Updates


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2890
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2006, 21:05
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

78% (01:00) correct 22% (01:28) wrong based on 245 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to reject a job applicant if working in the job would entail a 90 percent chance that the applicant would suffer a heart attack. The presiding judge justified the ruling, saying that it protected both employees and employers.

This use of his court ruling as part of the law could not be effective in regulating employment practices if which of the following were true?

(A) The best interests of employers often conflict with the interests of employees.
(B) No legally accepted methods exist for calculating the risk of a job applicant's having a heart attack as a result of being employed in any particular occupation.
(C) Some jobs might involve health risks other than the risk of heart attack.
(D) Employees who have a 90 percent chance of suffering a heart attack may be unaware that their risk is so great.
(E) The number of people applying for jobs at a company might decline if the company, by screening applicants for risk of heart attack, seemed to suggest that the job entailed high risk of heart attack.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008


Last edited by WoundedTiger on 24 Oct 2014, 03:20, edited 1 time in total.
OA added
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 567
Location: Munich,Germany
Re: Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2006, 21:19
B, IMO , gives us a reason why this ruling can cause prolems. If there is no legally acceptable way determinig the risk, then there can be conflicting results. Employers might calculate a percentage which is <90%, but potenital employees might calcuate the risk as >90%, o vice-versa which will cause problems in employment practices.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 1479
Re: Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2006, 21:27
(B) No legally accepted methods exist for calculating the risk of a job applicant's having a heart attack as a result of being employed in any particular occupation.
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1727
Re: Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2006, 21:34
Clear winner B.

Employment practices are supposed to be fair.
IF no legally accpeted methods are present to find the chances of a person suffering a heart attack then the ruling cannot be a fair emploemtn practice.
VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1399
Re: Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2006, 09:37
if B is true, then the argument doesn't make sense

so B should be IT
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2006
Posts: 111
Location: London
Re: Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2006, 02:13
B, but not sure I can rule out A that easily
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 230
Location: Arkansas, US
WE 1: 2.5 yrs in manufacturing
Re: Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2006, 02:21
Can rule out everything else...B is the winner
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Posts: 241
Location: Italy
Re: Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2006, 02:38
I do not know if this one is a gmat question type btw for me it seems that B wins
_________________

“If money is your hope for independence you will never have it. The only real security that a man will have in this world is a reserve of knowledge, experience, and ability.â€

CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2890
Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008
Re: Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2006, 06:37
Good job friends. OA is B.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10326
Premium Member
Re: Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 May 2015, 16:32
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10326
Premium Member
Re: Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jun 2016, 09:05
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Status: 800 and more!
Joined: 11 Apr 2017
Posts: 44
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 620 Q47 V29
GPA: 3.75
Reviews Badge
Re: Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 May 2017, 20:28
Can someone explain why option D and A are wrong?
Re: Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to   [#permalink] 12 May 2017, 20:28
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Recently a court ruled that current law allows companies to

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.