Bunuel
Researchers asked volunteers to imagine they were running a five-kilometer race against 50 people and then against 500 people, races in each of which the top 10 percent would receive a $1,000 prize. Asked about the effort they would apply in the respective cases, the volunteers indicated, on average, that they would run slower in the race against the greater number of people. A likely explanation of this result is that those of the volunteers who were most comparatively inclined—those who most tended to compare themselves with others in the social environment—determined (perhaps unconsciously) that extreme effort would not be worthwhile in the 500-competitor race.
Which of the following would, if known to be true, most help justify the explanation offered above?
A. The volunteers who were most comparatively inclined were also those that had the greatest desire to win a $1,000 prize.
B. The volunteers who were the least comparatively inclined had no greater desire to win the $1,000 than those who were the most comparatively inclined.
C. The volunteers who were most comparatively inclined were likely to indicate that they would run the two races at the same speed.
D. The most comparatively inclined volunteers believed that they were significantly less likely to finish in the top 10 percent in the race against 500 than in the race against 50.
E. Volunteers were chosen for participation in the study on the basis of answers to various questions designed to measure the degree to which the volunteers were comparatively inclined.
CR73241.01
OG2020 NEW QUESTION
The volunteers indicated, on average, that they would run slower in the race against the greater number of people. Say, they will invest an effort of 9 (on a scale of 1 -10) in 50 participant race and 7 in 500 participant race.
Why?
A likely explanation is that those of the volunteers who were most competitive determined that extreme effort would not be worthwhile in the 500-competitor race.
(So they reduced the effort they would apply in 500 participant race bringing the avg down)
A. The volunteers who were most comparatively inclined were also those that had the greatest desire to win a $1,000 prize.
It doesn't do anything for our explanation. It doesn't help to prove that competitive people feel that effort is not worthwhile in the larger race and that is why they plan to invest less effort. The distinction needs to be made in the two diff races by the competitive people, not between different types of people.
B. The volunteers who were the least comparatively inclined had no greater desire to win the $1,000 than those who were the most comparatively inclined.
Same logic as above. The distinction needs to be made in the two diff races by the competitive people, not between different types of people.
C. The volunteers who were most comparatively inclined were likely to indicate that they would run the two races at the same speed.
It weakens our explanation. We are saying that competitive people feel that running that hard in the larger race is not worthwhile.
D. The most comparatively inclined volunteers believed that they were significantly less likely to finish in the top 10 percent in the race against 500 than in the race against 50.
If this is true, we are given that competitive people believed that they were less likely to win with more people. Hence it makes sense that they would feel that extreme effort would not be worthwhile in the 500 participant race. Then our explanation makes more sense. Correct.
E. Volunteers were chosen for participation in the study on the basis of answers to various questions designed to measure the degree to which the volunteers were comparatively inclined.
Doesn't strengthen our explanation.
Answer (D)
The biggest problem I have with D is that, to me, it looks like it is just paraphrasing the conclusion given in the argument:
The argument already says: a likely explanation = most comparatively inclined ppl believe the extreme effort is not worth it (in race against 500). Ok, I'm paraphrasing here, but they don't believe it's worthwhile vs 500 means they don't believe they are likely to win no?
In many other strengthen / weaken questions, if an answer just restates / paraphrases / or even explains an already given premise, it is considered pointless. But for this question, it looks (to me) like the OA does just that.
Because of that, I keep getting drawn to A because I thought for some convoluted bridging of logic, it has to strengthen the conclusion =)). Now I'm not sure. But can someone explain to me why D is acceptable?