Apr 20 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Christina scored 760 by having clear (ability) milestones and a trackable plan to achieve the same. Attend this webinar to learn how to build trackable milestones that leverage your strengths to help you get to your target GMAT score. Apr 20 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT The Easter Bunny brings … the first day of school?? Yes! Now is the time to start studying for the GMAT if you’re planning to apply to Round 1 of fall MBA programs. Get a special discount with the Easter sale! Apr 21 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score. Apr 21 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT $84 + an extra $10 off for the first month of EMPOWERgmat access. Train to be ready for Round 3 Deadlines with EMPOWERgmat's Score Booster. Ends April 21st Code: GCENHANCED Apr 22 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT What people who reach the high 700's do differently? We're going to share insights, tips, and strategies from data we collected on over 50,000 students who used examPAL. Save your spot today! Apr 23 08:00 PM EDT  09:00 PM EDT Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics. Tuesday, April 23rd at 8 pm ET Apr 24 08:00 PM EDT  09:00 PM EDT Maximize Your Potential: 5 Steps to Getting Your Dream MBA Part 3 of 5: Key TestTaking Strategies for GMAT. Wednesday, April 24th at 8 pm ET
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 15 May 2008
Posts: 18

Rounding up or rounding down
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Sep 2010, 12:55
Hello,
I am not 100% sure whether to round up an integer, say 2.5, to 3.0 or round down to 2.0. And what should happen in case of 2.5? Does such situation occur on GMAT?
Please respond.



Manager
Joined: 16 Sep 2010
Posts: 189
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Real Estate

Re: Rounding up or rounding down
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Sep 2010, 13:18
I always adhere to the rule of 5, if its .5 or above you round up. This is obviously inverse for negative numbers.
You may encounter this but its unlikely as most interaction with strictly integers is limited to data sufficiency and you do not need to actually solve these only prove that they can be solved.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 54371

Re: Rounding up or rounding down
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Sep 2010, 13:32
Rounding is simplifying a number to a certain place value. To round the decimal drop the extra decimal places, and if the first dropped digit is 5 or greater, round up the last digit that you keep. If the first dropped digit is 4 or smaller, round down (keep the same) the last digit that you keep. Example:5.3485 rounded to the nearest tenth = 5.3, since the dropped 4 is less than 5. 5.3485 rounded to the nearest hundredth = 5.35, since the dropped 8 is greater than 5. 5.3485 rounded to the nearest thousandth = 5.349, since the dropped 5 is equal to 5. So 2.5 rounded to the nearest integer equals to 3. As for rounding negative numbers: you won't need this for GMAT, so don't worry about it.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 15 May 2008
Posts: 18

Re: Rounding up or rounding down
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Sep 2010, 14:25
Thanks u0422811 and Bunuel.



Manager
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Posts: 93

Re: Rounding up or rounding down
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Sep 2010, 14:58
I believe the official rule of gmat is to round up if its .5 or above and down if its .4 or below. Though one must be carefull in some instances where you must round down at all times. For example if the question asks the number of people that can fit into a room, and your calculation gives 11.9, the answer would be 11 rather than 12.



Manager
Joined: 30 May 2010
Posts: 176

Re: Rounding up or rounding down
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Sep 2010, 15:55
The GMAT will occasionally give a crazy rule for rounding, and say any number [x] should always be rounded up/down. They usually rely on "tricking" you on negative numbers. When rounding up/down on a negative number, it may be helpful to visualize the number line to make sure you are rounding in the right direction!



Intern
Joined: 15 Jan 2015
Posts: 5

Re: Rounding up or rounding down
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Jan 2015, 02:41
There is a theory in maths....which says if you are rounding about a odd no. and the next digit is 5....we move up...and if its even then we move down the idea is once a set of random numbers is rounded the overall figure should be closer to the earlier sum (without rounding), the usual round up around 5 is upward biased Any experts take on this? Would like to know this exact rule and does gmat take this rule or simple 5up rule....if so could u provide an OG example which clarifies this? Thanks



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 54371

Re: Rounding up or rounding down
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Jan 2015, 03:20
bullseye800 wrote: There is a theory in maths....which says if you are rounding about a odd no. and the next digit is 5....we move up...and if its even then we move down the idea is once a set of random numbers is rounded the overall figure should be closer to the earlier sum (without rounding), the usual round up around 5 is upward biased Any experts take on this? Would like to know this exact rule and does gmat take this rule or simple 5up rule....if so could u provide an OG example which clarifies this? Thanks Rounding rules used for the GMAT are given in my post above. No need to complicate things.
_________________



Current Student
Joined: 03 Aug 2011
Posts: 281
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
GMAT 1: 640 Q44 V34 GMAT 2: 700 Q42 V44 GMAT 3: 680 Q44 V39 GMAT 4: 740 Q49 V41
GPA: 3.7
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)

Re: Rounding up or rounding down
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 May 2015, 02:13
Bunuel wrote: Example: 5.3485 rounded to the nearest tenth = 5.3, since the dropped 4 is less than 5. 5.3485 rounded to the nearest hundredth = 5.35, since the dropped 8 is greater than 5. 5.3485 rounded to the nearest thousandth = 5.349, since the dropped 5 is equal to 5.
Bunuel, I'm slightly confused by your explanation and the GC Math Book. IMO, in example 1 regardless of the fact that you should round to the nearest tenth, you should always start backwards, basically that the tenthousandth makes the 8 become a 9, then this thousandth changes the 4 to a 5, and finally the 5 transforms the tenth in a 4. At least that is the rule I have studied in primary school. I don't argue that your rule may be the one applicable on the GMAT, but nevertheless, I would be glad to hear your take on this. Thank you!
_________________
Thank you very much for reading this post till the end! Kudos?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 54371

Re: Rounding up or rounding down
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 May 2015, 02:54
bgpower wrote: Bunuel wrote: Example: 5.3485 rounded to the nearest tenth = 5.3, since the dropped 4 is less than 5. 5.3485 rounded to the nearest hundredth = 5.35, since the dropped 8 is greater than 5. 5.3485 rounded to the nearest thousandth = 5.349, since the dropped 5 is equal to 5.
Bunuel, I'm slightly confused by your explanation and the GC Math Book. IMO, in example 1 regardless of the fact that you should round to the nearest tenth, you should always start backwards, basically that the tenthousandth makes the 8 become a 9, then this thousandth changes the 4 to a 5, and finally the 5 transforms the tenth in a 4. At least that is the rule I have studied in primary school. I don't argue that your rule may be the one applicable on the GMAT, but nevertheless, I would be glad to hear your take on this. Thank you! The GMAT uses the rule given in my post. When rounding to the tenth you look at only the hundredth digit, when rounding to the hundredth you look at only the thousandth digit, etc.
_________________



GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 1418

Rounding up or rounding down
[#permalink]
Show Tags
07 May 2015, 14:25
You will never need to worry about how to round 2.5 "to the nearest integer" on the GMAT. Different conventions are used in different countries in this situation, so it would not be a fair question. I'd personally have no idea how to answer it. It's a question that doesn't really make any sense  we can't round 2.5 to the "nearest integer", because two different integers (2 and 3) are equally near to 2.5. That said, you would definitely round 2.5001 up to 3 (if rounding to the nearest integer), because 2.5001 is (very slightly) closer to 3 than it is to 2. Similarly, you'd round 2.4999 down to 2, because 2.4999 is (very slightly) closer to 2 than it is to 3. That's exactly what you'd do if you followed the rule Bunuel described above, so that rule is a perfectly good one to follow.
_________________
GMAT Tutor in Toronto
If you are looking for online GMAT math tutoring, or if you are interested in buying my advanced Quant books and problem sets, please contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com



NonHuman User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 10549

Re: Rounding up or rounding down
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Jul 2017, 08:45
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________




Re: Rounding up or rounding down
[#permalink]
17 Jul 2017, 08:45






