ayushman
mikemcgarry
I think you were searching more for a sentence such as this:
I like John more than Harry.
which could mean
(1)
I like John more than I like Harry.
or
(2)
I like John more than Harry likes John.
Does all this make sense?
Mike

Oh that would be too simple:).
Question number 98, OG-13, option A:
Ranked as one of the most important of Europe's young playwrights, Franz Xaver Kroetz has written 40 plays; his works—translated into more than 30 languages—are produced more often
than any contemporary German dramatist.
OE: A dramatist cannot be produced and cannot be compared to works.
Again, "dramatist can be produced" is a non-sensical interpretation, but OG rules out this option because of this interpretation.
Can you please share your thoughts.
Dear
ayushman,
I'm happy to respond.
As always, this question from the OG is fantastic. The folks at GMAC are extraordinary at crafting these gems.
Part of what is intriguing about this sentence is the break created by the semicolon. Mr. Kroetz is the subject of the first half, and naively we might expect him to be the subject throughout, because he is ultimately the "doer" of everything discussed in this sentence. The first clause subtly creates the expectation that we will be comparing people. BUT, the comparison is ultimate not between people, but between plays, and plays are the subject of the second independent clause, the one that follows the semicolon. You are perfectly correct --- we absolutely cannot compare people to plays, and people most definitely are not "
produced."
That's precisely why option
(A) is trainwreck-wrong:
... his works .... are produced more often than any contemporary German dramatist.
To correct this ---
(a) we need to compare plays to plays --- we could say "
plays of" or simply "
those of"
(b) the word "any" without the word "other" creates a logical problem.
To see this logical problem, consider a simpler version, a comparison of people.
Franz Xaver Kroetz has published more than any contemporary German dramatist.
In that sentence, the grammar is correct, the parallelism is correct, but there's a grave logical problem. Mr. Kroetz
is a contemporary German dramatist. If he has published more than any contemporary German dramatist, then "any contemporary German dramatist" includes himself, and we are saying that he publishes more than himself!! We avoid this mistake by including the word "
other."
The OA,
(D), fixes both of these problems:
(D) Ranked as one of the most important of Europe's young playwrights, Franz Xaver Kroetz has written 40 plays; his works—translated into more than 30 languages—are produced more often than those of any other contemporary German dramatist.It would also be correct add the verb:
Ranked as one of the most important of Europe's young playwrights, Franz Xaver Kroetz has written 40 plays; his works—translated into more than 30 languages—are produced more often than are those of any other contemporary German dramatist.Including that verb is perfectly fine, but absolutely unnecessary, because the parallelism is 100% clear without it.
Does all this make sense?
Mike