Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
01 Oct 2017, 23:44
Kudos
Bookmarks
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
65%
(hard)
Question Stats:
67% (02:43) correct
33%
(03:06)
wrong
based on 879
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Samples from the floor of a rock shelter in Pennsylvania were dated by analyzing the carbon they contained. The dates assigned to samples associated with human activities formed a consistent series, beginning with the present and going back in time, a series that was correlated with the depth from which the samples came. The oldest and deepest sample was dated at 19,650 years before the present, plus or minus 2,400 years. Skeptic, viewing that date as too early and inconsistent with the accepted date of human migration into North America, suggested that the samples could have been contaminated by dissolved old carbon carried by percolating groundwater from nearby coal deposits.
Which one of the following considerations, if true, argues most strongly against the suggestion of the skeptics?
A. No likely mechanism of contamination involving percolating groundwater would have affected the deeper samples from the site without affecting the uppermost sample.
B. Not every application of the carbon-dating procedure has led to results that have been generally acceptable to scientists.
C. There is no evidence that people were using coal for fuel at any time when the deepest layer might have been laid down.
D. No sample in the series, when retested by the carbon-dating procedure, was assigned an earlier date than that assigned to a sample from a layer above it.
E. No North American site besides the one in Pennsylvania has ever yielded a sample to which the carbon-dating procedure assigned a date that was comparably ancient.
Source: LSAT
Which one of the following considerations, if true, argues most strongly against the suggestion of the skeptics?
A. No likely mechanism of contamination involving percolating groundwater would have affected the deeper samples from the site without affecting the uppermost sample.
B. Not every application of the carbon-dating procedure has led to results that have been generally acceptable to scientists.
C. There is no evidence that people were using coal for fuel at any time when the deepest layer might have been laid down.
D. No sample in the series, when retested by the carbon-dating procedure, was assigned an earlier date than that assigned to a sample from a layer above it.
E. No North American site besides the one in Pennsylvania has ever yielded a sample to which the carbon-dating procedure assigned a date that was comparably ancient.
Source: LSAT
27 Nov 2018, 22:43
Kudos
Bookmarks
broall
There are literally many layers to this passage, so let's take the time to break it all down.
Skeptics suggest that samples associated with human activities could have been contaminated by dissolved old carbon carried by percolating groundwater from nearby coal deposits.
Here's how they arrived at this suggestion (i.e., conclusion):
- Samples from the rock shelter floor were carbon-dated.
- For samples associated with human activities, the assigned dates formed a consistent series.
- This series starts with the present day and goes back in time. The deeper the sample, the earlier the date of that sample.
- The oldest, deepest sample is dated at 19,650 years before present day (+/- 2,400 years).
- Skeptics believe that this date is too early to accept, because it doesn't match the accepted date of human migration into North America.
- Skeptics therefore suggest that the samples could have been contaminated -- specifically via percolating groundwater, which theoretically dissolved old carbon from nearby coal deposits, then carried that carbon into the rock shelter floor.
Quote:
We're looking for the choice that most weakens the skeptics' suggestion that these samples have been contaminated by old carbon in percolating groundwater. We can't really challenge the accepted date of human migration to North America. And the claim that the samples were contaminated is really the heart of the skeptics' suggestion, so the potential means of contamination is especially open to question. Let's work our way through the answer choices.
Quote:
Hmmm, not bad! The skeptics are reacting to the oldest and deepest sample. Since they don't agree with the date assigned to that sample, they're suggesting that the samples as a whole could have been contaminated by percolating groundwater.
But according to the passage, the top-layer sample dates to the present day. This dating of the top layer isn't called into question by anyone, not even the skeptics. So if (A) is true, then there's no way the samples could have been contaminated by percolating groundwater. (A) says that if this type of contamination had happened, then old carbon would have contaminated the top layer as well, and top-layer samples would NOT have been dated with the present day.
Consequently, if (A) is true, then it's very unlikely that the mechanism of contamination named by skeptics (percolating groundwater) was the cause of this unusually early date in the deepest sample. (A) isn't a watertight argument killer, but it knocks back the skeptics' reasoning in a very direct way. So let's keep this choice around.
Quote:
Huh? What do the general opinions of scientists have to do with this particular series, this particular sample, this particular date, and these particular skeptics? Choice (B) doesn't come close to addressing the conclusion that we're trying to weaken, so eliminate it.
Quote:
We don't care whether coal was ever being used for fuel. Unless there's some concrete connection between the uses of coal and the ways that coal could have contaminated these rock samples, then what people have done with coal is irrelevant. Eliminate (C).
Quote:
Choice (D) is one of those options that sounds good but really says nothing at all. The passage already tells us that the order of dates in the series was consistent. This choice repeats the same fact in different wording. If (D) is true, we haven't learned anything new, and aren't closer to understanding why the deepest, earliest sample seems to be dated with a year that's too far in the past. So we'll eliminate (D), too.
Quote:
Like choice (B), this choice points us to information that's way outside the scope of this argument and has very little to do with the specific conclusion we've been asked to weaken. If anything, this information would make us slightly more likely to believe the skeptics, because it tells us that this weird date truly is an outlier. So we'll get rid of (E).
(A) is the only choice that directly addresses the logic presented by the skeptics, then offers information to cast doubt on that logic. None of the other choices come close, so even if we're getting to (A) solely through elimination, it's the best choice available.
I hope this helps! (...specifically, I hope this helps you rock the GMAT? Haha. Yeah, I know: my puns are getting worse.)
General Discussion
sobby
Current Student
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Last visit: 24 Jan 2022
Posts: 444
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
Schools: Rotman '20 (S) Kelley '21 (S) (A)
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.76
02 Oct 2017, 05:48
Kudos
Bookmarks
broall
A and C seems as weakener ..but we are not concerned about the usage of coal ..coal can be there without being used by any civilization ...that eliminates C
A is best among lot ..that says because of percolating ground water ,all the layer would have been equally effected .....not only last layer ..
