I wanted to update this thread in regards to ranking schools by their strength in MC - particularly among MBB. I ran some numbers using data over the past 4 years (2007-2011) This accounts for how schools performed when the market was both great (2007,2008) and horrid (2009,2010) for Management Consulting. Thankfully, based on the economy, recent press released from top consulting firms, and other sources, it appears that recruiting is once again on the rise and 2011 stands poised to be a big year again.
This ranking was derived using the following methodology:
1. (50%) # of MBB hires from the school divided by # of total students seeking employment.
2. (50%) # of MBB hires divided by the proportion of consulting industry students in from the school seeking employment.
An index score was then assigned to each school so that we can see how far apart they are in relation to each other . Top school = 100
*Note: HBS, Stanford, and Stern are highly protective of their recruiting #'s and refuse to give them out. It is assumed that HBS/Stanford are the best MC schools, but its hard to know w/o any hard #'s. I have no clue about Stern - my guess is they would be in the 10-15 rank range...
Here is how they stacked up relative to one another:
1. HBS/Stanford/Wharton - 100
4. MIT - 87
5. Kellogg - 83
6. Columbia - 80
7. Chicago - 67
8. Tuck - 66
9. Ross / Haas - 47
11. Darden - 41
12. Duke - 29
Obviously, this is flawed because it really depends on # of students who want MBB/ # of students who get offers. This is also assuming that the quality (based on undergrad school/GPA/GMAT) is comparable across schools. I mean someone with a 3.8 engineering GPA at MIT and 780 GMAT is different than a 2.9 soft major GPA ,unknown school and 610 GMAT trying to get on a closed list for the first interview.