GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 20 Aug 2018, 02:08

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Scientists propose placing seismic stations on the floor of the Pacifi

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: Getting strong now, I'm so strong now!!!
Affiliations: National Institute of Technology, Durgapur
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Posts: 506
Location: India
GPA: 3.32
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Scientists propose placing seismic stations on the floor of the Pacifi  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Sep 2013, 22:42
4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

95% (00:58) correct 5% (01:23) wrong based on 528 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Scientists propose placing seismic stations on the floor of the Pacific Ocean to warn threatened coastal communities on the northwestern coast of the United States of approaching tidal waves caused by earthquakes. Since forewarned communities could take steps to evacuate, many of the injuries and deaths that would otherwise occur could be avoided if the government would implement this proposal.

The answer to which of the following questions would be most important in determining whether implementing the proposal would be likely to achieve the desired result?


(A) When was the last time that the coastal communities were threatened by an approaching tidal wave?

(B) How far below sea level would the stations be located?

(C) Would there be enough time after receiving warning of an approaching tidal wave for communities to evacuate safely?

(D) How soon after a tidal wave hits land is it safe for evacuees to return to their communities?

(E) Can the stations be equipped to collect and relay information about phenomena other than tidal waves caused by earthquakes?

_________________

Regards,

S

Consider +1 KUDOS if you find this post useful

Board of Directors
User avatar
P
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3446
Re: Scientists propose placing seismic stations on the floor of the Pacifi  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2013, 10:10
(A) When was the last time that the coastal communities were threatened by an approaching tidal wave?

The last time or in other words what happened in the past is not our concern. OUT

(8) How far below sea level would the stations be located?

The station is not the point at issue: we care about of people NOT stations where they are located. OUT

(C) Would there be enough time after receiving warning of an approaching tidal wave for communities to evacuate safely?

This is our answer. People have enough time or not: yes a lots of people could be saved, otherwise a lots of people could be killed

(0) How soon after a tidal wave hits land is it safe for evacuees to return to their communities?

The return to home is not relevant. OUT

(E) Can the stations be equipped to collect and relay information about phenomena other than tidal waves caused by earthquakes?

Other than tidal or in other words something else to check by the stations is not related to our argument. OUT
_________________

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS AND RESOURCES
Quant: 1. ALL GMATPrep questions Quant/Verbal 2. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation 3. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS 4. Veritas Prep Blog PDF Version 5. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Quant Videos
Verbal:1. Verbal question bank and directories by Carcass 2. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Verbal Videos 3. Critical Reasoning_Oldy but goldy question banks 4. Sentence Correction_Oldy but goldy question banks 5. Reading-comprehension_Oldy but goldy question banks

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Status: Admitted to U of M Ross
Joined: 01 Dec 2012
Posts: 92
Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V42
GPA: 2.9
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: Scientists propose placing seismic stations on the floor of the Pacifi  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2013, 10:14
I think Option C is the correct one.

The main "positive" outcome is the potential reduction in injury & deaths. But for this to happen, we must know whether the early warning system is "early enough" . Option C correctly asks this question and is the best option of the ones given.

Hope it helps!
_________________

Regards,
Vishnu

Article --> http://www.topmba.com/blog/could-mba-degree-be-way-forward

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 11 Aug 2013
Posts: 31
Re: Scientists propose placing seismic stations on the floor of the Pacifi  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Sep 2013, 18:18
can you guys help point the premise and or conclusion. Here's what I think the argument's structure is
Background, why? Outlines a descriptive plan.
Premise, Since Forewarned....evacuate.

Is the premise where I plug in the yes or no? If yes they evacuate, or if no they don't evacuate?

I'm having problems breaking down the argument, and labeling everything correctly. I'm guessing that my problem is in identifying the premise, background, conclusion, etc. please help.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Apr 2015
Posts: 67
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Scientists propose placing seismic stations on the floor of the Pacifi  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Nov 2015, 00:31
ANS = C - This question is the "Evaluate the conclusion/argument." where, we need to find the statement which provides information to decide whether the assumption in the argument is true or false.
Now, the assumption might be - Do people get enough time to evacuate?
C - ANS - If it is far away - More time - so people have time to evacuate. If too close - then no time to evacuate. So C.
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 2597
Premium Member
Re: Scientists propose placing seismic stations on the floor of the Pacifi  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jul 2018, 14:37
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

-
April 2018: New Forum dedicated to Verbal Strategies, Guides, and Resources

Re: Scientists propose placing seismic stations on the floor of the Pacifi &nbs [#permalink] 24 Jul 2018, 14:37
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Scientists propose placing seismic stations on the floor of the Pacifi

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.