tkorzhan1995
AndrewN, can you please explain what are the main factors to eliminate B?
Hello,
tkorzhan1995. How about we look at (B) in the context of the sentence?
Quote:
Several studies have found that the coronary patients who exercise most actively
have half or less than half the chance of dying of a heart attack as those who are sedentary.
(B) have half the chance, or less, of dying of a heart attack than those who are sedentary do
Okay, the first thing that stands out to me is the comparative
than. We see this used in
greater than,
less than,
more than, and so on, but
have half the chance than? That is flat-out wrong, and I would not bother analyzing the option any further. Still, in the interest of supplying a more robust answer to your query, I am also left scratching my head about the substitute verb
do at the end. You want to use such a substitute when the comparison involves two actions—e.g.,
He drives faster than she does—and here, the verb is
have:
dying is a noun, the object of the preposition
of, and
chance is also a noun. So, what exactly is
do standing in for? The best I can come up with is the phrase
have of dying of a heart attack. That is a lot for a substitute verb to carry. A more logical comparison in this sentence is created between two groups of people, those
who exercise (ditch the extra modifiers) and those
who are sedentary; as such, a noun-to-noun comparison, minus a verb or substitute, makes sense. Finally, there is a diction issue. As I touched on in an earlier post,
have half the chance of is a functional if somewhat off-putting way of expressing
are fifty percent less likely, as we see in answer choice (E), or
are half as likely. I would call this the least objectionable issue of the three I have outlined, though. Understanding comparisons is far more important, in my view.
Thank you for calling my attention to the question. Good luck with your studies.
- Andrew