Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 11:26 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 11:26

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
VP
VP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1030
Own Kudos [?]: 1779 [9]
Given Kudos: 2562
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Send PM
Director
Director
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Status:It always seems impossible until it's done.
Posts: 645
Own Kudos [?]: 2052 [2]
Given Kudos: 174
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Feb 2018
Posts: 314
Own Kudos [?]: 290 [1]
Given Kudos: 29
Send PM
Director
Director
Joined: 16 Sep 2016
Status:It always seems impossible until it's done.
Posts: 645
Own Kudos [?]: 2052 [0]
Given Kudos: 174
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 770 Q51 V42
Send PM
Re: Sharla is a better chess player than Marcus. Marcus is a better ches [#permalink]
SonalSinha803 wrote:
Gladiator59 wrote:
chesstitans wrote:
Sharla is a better chess player than Marcus.
Marcus is a better chess player than Evelyn.
Olivia routinely beats Evelyn at chess.

What is the likely outcome if Sharla and Olivia play a game of chess?

A. Olivia will beat Sharla
B. Sharla will beat Olivia
C. The game will end in a draw
D. Olivia will decide not to play Sharla because she is intimidated
E. The two women will decide not to play chess at all

Testguide


I made the following logical assumption - if a play is better at chess - he or she "always" wins the game when playing against a player who is not as good as them.

A > B is used to indicate A is better than B.

Sharia > Marcus
Marcus > Evelyn
Olivia routinely beats Evelyn.

So Olivia \(>=\) Evelyn

Here : Sharia is the strongest among at least Marcus and Evelyn.

Since Olivia is only "routinely" beating Evelyn and not always - it is safe to assume that Olivia is not as better than Evelyn as is Sharia ( who is better than a person already better than Evelyn )

So Sharia > Olivia.

Hi,

But routinely also means regularly. So the safest would be to assume both are equally good, since no other information is given as to who is better among them.

I would go with C.

Sent from my Lenovo K53a48 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app


Even by that interpretation Olivia would only be equal to someone who is better than Evelyn ( i.e Marcus).

Since we are given Sharia > Marcus and by your logic -> Marcus = Olivia so....

Sharia > Olivia.

Best,
Gladi
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Sep 2017
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 17
Send PM
Re: Sharla is a better chess player than Marcus. Marcus is a better ches [#permalink]
chesstitans wrote:
Sharla is a better chess player than Marcus.
Marcus is a better chess player than Evelyn.
Olivia routinely beats Evelyn at chess.

What is the likely outcome if Sharla and Olivia play a game of chess?

A. Olivia will beat Sharla
B. Sharla will beat Olivia
C. The game will end in a draw
D. Olivia will decide not to play Sharla because she is intimidated
E. The two women will decide not to play chess at all

Testguide

Although I answered correctly, this is a bad question and not at all like GMAC Qs. It is NOT logically provable.
Director
Director
Joined: 16 Jun 2021
Posts: 994
Own Kudos [?]: 183 [0]
Given Kudos: 309
Send PM
Re: Sharla is a better chess player than Marcus. Marcus is a better ches [#permalink]
A. Olivia will beat Sharla
Since mrcus is a better player than Elvin marcus and olivia can be approximated to be equal or olivia to inferior let us reject the later case since that will not affect significantly in which Sharla will beat Olivia

B. Sharla will beat Olivia
Exactly the right inference

C. The game will end in a draw
Cannot be infered from the current premise - Hence out

D. Olivia will decide not to play Sharla because she is intimidated
Out of context - Hence out

E. The two women will decide not to play chess at all
Out of context -Hence out
Therefore IMO B
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 Mar 2020
Posts: 33
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 249
Concentration: International Business
Send PM
Re: Sharla is a better chess player than Marcus. Marcus is a better ches [#permalink]
If you guys answer PS problems, you will encounter a similar question.

We have S>M>E. We also have O>E.
So what could be true here.

official answer says B (S>O). This is called reasoning test. So how can anyone here prove 100% that S>O. No one can. This is a very poorly structured question. If any answer choice could be true about this question, it would C not B and I won’t even say its a 100% solid answer

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17205
Own Kudos [?]: 848 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Sharla is a better chess player than Marcus. Marcus is a better ches [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Sharla is a better chess player than Marcus. Marcus is a better ches [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6917 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne