Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 04:48 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 04:48
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
agold
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Last visit: 01 Mar 2009
Posts: 1,578
Own Kudos:
Location: Southern California
Concentration: Investment Banking
Schools:Chicago (dinged), Tuck (November), Columbia (RD)
Posts: 1,578
Kudos: 300
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
MGOBLUE2
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 21 Oct 2006
Last visit: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 164
Own Kudos:
Posts: 164
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
agold
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Last visit: 01 Mar 2009
Posts: 1,578
Own Kudos:
Location: Southern California
Concentration: Investment Banking
Schools:Chicago (dinged), Tuck (November), Columbia (RD)
Posts: 1,578
Kudos: 300
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
ChristianW
Joined: 21 Feb 2008
Last visit: 05 Oct 2008
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
Posts: 45
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I totally agree that trying to plan for more than 4 school per application period would be very hard, but if you are willing to start now then a lot would be possible. If you look at a lot of the schools that you want to apply to, you will see that they all have several key essays in common that you can start now. As for your question about applying with 3 years of WE vs 4 years WE, some school such as Harvard are vying for a younger MBA class, whereas other schools prefer the extra WE. That said, 3 years should be more than enough for an MBA. Good luck with your GMAT and your applications next year. (don't put off the GMAT either, I let work delay mine for almost 4 months and it killed my chances of applying anywhere round 1)
User avatar
kryzak
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Last visit: 10 Aug 2013
Posts: 5,452
Own Kudos:
744
 [1]
Given Kudos: 14
Status:Um... what do you want to know?
Location: SF, CA, USA
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship, Digital Media & Entertainment
Schools:UC Berkeley Haas School of Business MBA 2010
GPA: 3.9 - undergrad 3.6 - grad-EE
WE 1: Social Gaming
Posts: 5,452
Kudos: 744
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
terp, first of all, welcome to the club and I'm very happy to see that you're starting early for the Fall 09 season!

with that said, here are my opinions, and they are just that, opinions. You have to do more research (talk to alums, visit campus, talk to career centers, etc...) on each school to make up your mind, but here goes nothing.

- Regarding whether you need 4 years of WE, it depends on the school, but with 3 years of STRONG experience, you should have a decent shot at all the schools. Stanford and Harvard likes younger folks, so definitely apply there if you're interested and young. Berkeley and Kellogg generally takes 3-5 years of WE and slant towards the more experienced side, so you're fine there too.

- Rd1 vs Rd2: If you can get it done by R1, do R1. Apply to the schools you care about the most in R1. There are many benefits to this: 1) You get to find out by January, allowing you to plan 6-8 months in advance, 2) Round 1, while the numbers are nearing R2 or exceeding them now (in terms of applicants), is still slightly better than R2 only because the adcom has not seen all the applications yet, and all the spots are open. Many adcoms have mentioned in passing that they give the "benefit of the doubt" in R1 if an applicant is borderline. 3) Next year it is predicted that there will be more increases in app volume, so R2 will really be impacted.

- applying to 13 schools: a BIG no-no. Search the forum for the "sniper" approach. I think rhyme wrote a very good dissertation on the effectiveness of that approach. I also highly recommend you read some articles in the "Knowledge Vault" found in my signature. I know it's not complete yet (I'm adding more things every week), but it should give you a good idea on why 13 is not only difficult, but strongly inadvisable.

My recommendation is to apply to 3-4 schools in R1, and start working on 2-3 more R2 schools depending on if you get interviews from the R1 schools. I did 3 in R1 and 1 in R2 and was pretty burned out. I know Nervous did 4 in R1 and 4 in R2, but she's an ironwoman and is simply amazing (she's 100% in her apps this season). So 4-7 schools total is a good number. Top choices in R1, backups in R2.

As for your list, based on my limited knowledge of PE and banking, here's what I would pick:


Round 1: (pick up to 4 here, and move the other one to R2)
1. Harvard
2. Penn
3. Chicago
4. Northwestern
5. Berkeley

Round 2 (if no admits are secured to R1 schools): (pick up to 3 here and include 1 from R1 list)
6. Columbia
7. Michigan
8. NYU
9. Dartmouth
10. Yale
User avatar
dabots
Joined: 18 Sep 2006
Last visit: 28 Apr 2014
Posts: 955
Own Kudos:
Location: Chicago, IL
Schools:Chicago Booth 2010
Posts: 955
Kudos: 34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I dont know that much about PE, but i think its generally assumed that H/S/W will give you the best shot at getting in. After that Chicago and MIT Sloan are good options. 4 schools in the both rounds is pretty tough too... really hard to sustain the application process after 1st round apps.

When did Maryland become a top public school :)
User avatar
kryzak
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Last visit: 10 Aug 2013
Posts: 5,452
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Status:Um... what do you want to know?
Location: SF, CA, USA
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship, Digital Media & Entertainment
Schools:UC Berkeley Haas School of Business MBA 2010
GPA: 3.9 - undergrad 3.6 - grad-EE
WE 1: Social Gaming
Posts: 5,452
Kudos: 744
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
addendum to what I wrote:

I forgot to add STANFORD to your R1 list, sorry! :oops:

But do know that Stanford's admit rate is dropping to an all time low this year (probably 7%) and will probably drop even more for bankers next year when even more people are applying. Just keep that in mind when you apply and your expectations will be set correctly.
avatar
aceman626
Joined: 12 Nov 2006
Last visit: 19 Apr 2010
Posts: 469
Own Kudos:
Posts: 469
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If I were you, i'd go

Round 1 - 5 schools

HBS
Stanford (since you want SF)
Wharton
Chicago
Berkeley

Round 2 - 3 schools

Columbia (regular decision)
UCLA
Tuck or Kellogg (choose one)
User avatar
agold
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Last visit: 01 Mar 2009
Posts: 1,578
Own Kudos:
Location: Southern California
Concentration: Investment Banking
Schools:Chicago (dinged), Tuck (November), Columbia (RD)
Posts: 1,578
Kudos: 300
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hey guys,

Thanks for all of the advice. I had ruled out Stanford due to the low admit rate, as well as the large amount of time the application takes. Is it really worthwhile for me to give it a shot?

kryzak - Thanks for all of the advice. I found the piece about younger applicants and the R1 vs. R2 details especially helpful.

dabots - I guess we're not technically there yet, but we'll keep climbing the rankings, right? I like to think positively :)

aceman - I noticed that when you guys shortened my list down from 13 schools to 8, you removed a lot of the schools I considered "safeties" (Duke, UVA, NYU, Yale, Michigan). Can you explain your reasoning for excluding them? Is it due to the weak placement in PE/IB, or because you just believe my profile is strong enough to secure an admit or two to the 8 you mentioned?

Is my profile likely strong enough to secure an admit to one or two of my R1 choices? I'm always questioning this and right now I thnk it's just a big toss up.
User avatar
kwam
Joined: 09 Jan 2007
Last visit: 19 Oct 2013
Posts: 1,018
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Location: New York, NY
Concentration: Analytic Finance, Economics and Strategic Management
Schools:Chicago Booth Class of 2010
Posts: 1,018
Kudos: 167
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I'd apply to these schools:

1. Harvard
2. Stanford
3. Penn
4. Chicago
5. Berkeley
6. Columbia
7. Northwestern
8. Sloan
(No particular order)

So it is M7 plus Berkeley (which in my opinion is the M8 school), and as you want to be in SF, would be a natural movement.

I didn't understand why Stanford is out of your list. EDITED: ops now I saw; and I say: no pain, no gain :-D .

But first take your GMAT, and start doing the essays (It took much longer than I was expecting, perhaps because I'm international...).
User avatar
dabots
Joined: 18 Sep 2006
Last visit: 28 Apr 2014
Posts: 955
Own Kudos:
Location: Chicago, IL
Schools:Chicago Booth 2010
Posts: 955
Kudos: 34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i took out the "safeties" because i was under the impression you would reapply for fall 2010 anyway if you did not get in a top school
avatar
aceman626
Joined: 12 Nov 2006
Last visit: 19 Apr 2010
Posts: 469
Own Kudos:
Posts: 469
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I do think you will get into at least one out of the eight. It depends on things like how well you write, how well you interview, any unique experiences you have, how strong your recs are, overall economy, etc.

Based on those elements, if you have some doubts, you can drop Stanford from R1 and add a safety in R2. Based on what you want to do, I think NYU would probably be the choice if you want to go this route.
User avatar
kryzak
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Last visit: 10 Aug 2013
Posts: 5,452
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Status:Um... what do you want to know?
Location: SF, CA, USA
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship, Digital Media & Entertainment
Schools:UC Berkeley Haas School of Business MBA 2010
GPA: 3.9 - undergrad 3.6 - grad-EE
WE 1: Social Gaming
Posts: 5,452
Kudos: 744
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kwam
I'd apply to these schools:
So it is M7 plus Berkeley (which in my opinion is the M8 school), and as you want to be in SF, would be a natural movement.

I'll have to pay you the next time I see you, kwam. :wink:

terp, I think most of us believe that if you get a high GMAT Score (over 720) and write very good and convincing essays, you can get into at least one of the schools you listed. I actually missed the part where you said SF (sorry!), so here's my revised list and my comments on each school.

Round 1:
1. Harvard - name brand for PE/VC
2. Penn or Chicago (pick one) - good for banking finance
3. Berkeley - Healthcare/Tech in SF area, not too shabby with finance and has inroads with VCs
4. Stanford - PE/VC, Tech, SF area

Round 2:

5. Columbia or NYU (pick one) - Finance, but you might need the CBS brand for PE/VC
6. Yale - I've heard from a buddy of mine he's applying to Yale to get the name for PE, even though Yale's b-school isn't ranked that high, the mother school's name brand will help.
7. UCLA - finance, can get you a job in SF area pretty easily, your safety school. Just make sure you VISIT them and shower them with attention, otherwise they will ding you because they know you have them as a safety school.

So there you go, 4 schools for R1, 3 schools for R2 depending on how R1 goes. Addresses your SF/Banking/Tech/Healthcare/PE/VC desires.
User avatar
agold
Joined: 11 Mar 2008
Last visit: 01 Mar 2009
Posts: 1,578
Own Kudos:
Location: Southern California
Concentration: Investment Banking
Schools:Chicago (dinged), Tuck (November), Columbia (RD)
Posts: 1,578
Kudos: 300
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Well, this was very reassuring guys. Thanks for all of the advice and encouragement. It's time for me to crack the GMAT over the next several months and then revisit this list/finalize it around July and August.
User avatar
riverripper
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 10 Apr 2007
Last visit: 20 Aug 2022
Posts: 4,306
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Location: Back in Chicago, IL
Concentration: General/Operations Management
Schools:Kellogg Alum: Class of 2010
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
Posts: 4,306
Kudos: 806
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
One thing to think about, and i think this has pretty much been backed up by what we have witnessed on this site. R1 is easier than R2. Schools will tell you they are equal but just judging by this site, admin411, and BW...R1 definitely is easier than R2. So although people say your worst application is your first I say apply to your top choices in R1. The first app you should work on should be the one with the most comprehensive essays, Montauk suggests Kellogg and I think those of us that applied there will tell you they definitely cover the most ground in their essays. Look at the essays for your schools you are applying to in R1 and see which one has the most material that can be reused in the rest of your essays.
User avatar
kryzak
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Last visit: 10 Aug 2013
Posts: 5,452
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 14
Status:Um... what do you want to know?
Location: SF, CA, USA
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship, Digital Media & Entertainment
Schools:UC Berkeley Haas School of Business MBA 2010
GPA: 3.9 - undergrad 3.6 - grad-EE
WE 1: Social Gaming
Posts: 5,452
Kudos: 744
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Another tip is to start working on the set of essays that is due the LATEST in R1. This way you finish them first, go work on other essays, and then come back to it a week or two before it's due to refine it with all the knowledge you learned from the other essays. I did that with my Haas essays. They covered quite a bit of ground, then went on to UCLA, then Stanford, and finally back to Haas. when I returned to Haas again, I found even more ways to improve them (even though I thought they were done when I first "finished" them).

Reuse is good, just be very careful that you're answering the question and not just blatantly copy and pasting. I know some people on this forum don't like reuse and re-write every single word, but I would say my reuse statistic is probably 50-75% for similar questions. Of course I had to write new material and modify things, but in general, if the theme is the same, then you can reuse.
User avatar
shmegs
Joined: 15 Jun 2007
Last visit: 06 Sep 2009
Posts: 483
Own Kudos:
Posts: 483
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I'm a big believer in R1 over R2 (probably doesn't make a big difference) but if you are going to put together 3-4 really outstanding apps start early. I planned to submit 5 apps in R1 and barely managed 4 even with one 1 Nov. deadline. Look through the old posts to get a better idea but basically start early...write one set of essays revise a whole lot and leave them aside. Go through your other apps and then come back to your first school and realize how crappy your first attempt was. My first app was Tuck and by the time I looked at that app after finishing my Wharton one I was shocked at how bad my first go at this process was. As for schools...Wharton all the way j/k. If you need guidance listen to kry, he has a great post sometime back on the whole process.
User avatar
terry12
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 23 Jul 2007
Last visit: 18 Jun 2010
Posts: 313
Own Kudos:
Concentration: Healthcare
Schools:Attending Stanford
Posts: 313
Kudos: 69
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
First, I'm glad others have already recommended Stanford :-D

Second, agree with everyone else here on the numbers, etc. I think 4/round is kind of a magic number. At the start of this process I was thinking, "Oh come on. How hard can these apps be? I'll bang out 5 or 6 in a few weeks, no problem."

Oops :roll:

Also, keep in mind that you might start to run into fatigue after even a single round of 4 apps. I had a very difficult time getting even a single application into round 2 after 4 in the first round. So I would recommend concentrating your efforts on your top ~ 4 choices in the first round and moving on from there.

Good luck!
User avatar
shmegs
Joined: 15 Jun 2007
Last visit: 06 Sep 2009
Posts: 483
Own Kudos:
Posts: 483
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Just to add, if you have a top choice leave that for later...start with a school you want to go to but wouldn't be devastated if you received a ding. Your first attempt isn't going to be great...unless you really REALLY work on it, this is a learning process and you'll get better with practice. Terry is on the money it took me approximately 3-4 weeks to revise and edit each set of essays, that's after getting the outlines down and cranking out a first draft. Everyone is different but I think I ran through 20 drafts of each Wharton essay before I ran out of time and submitted my app...I'm still not happy with the essays :lol: .
User avatar
rhyme
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Last visit: 02 Dec 2024
Posts: 5,909
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
WE:Business Development (Consumer Packaged Goods)
Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
Posts: 5,909
Kudos: 3,172
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:

My career goals are to enter private equity (preferably growth equity rather than LBOs) or late stage
venture capital. If I am unable to enter PE right out of school, I would most likely be interested
in working for a bulge bracket investment bank (primary areas of interest would be healthcare/tech
banking in a San Francisco office).

It is way early to bring this up, but I thought I'd point out that such a plan is often impossible. The problem is simple. Banks come and recruit immediately -- I'd even met people from the GSB who got offers from banks before they even started school! Its that competitive. PE / VC on the other hand, is very very much a "lets see what we need for the summer in March" kind of recruiting. In other words, its essentially impossible to recruit for PE/VC, and if that fails, recruit for IB. The timing just doesn't work (and banks won't give you six months to decide). So, you either have to bite the bullet, accept the risk, go for broke in PE/VC or just nab the IB offer. It comes down to risk tolerance really. Not to be underestimated, its very very hard to sit by and watch all the banks recruit, then all the consulting firms, then all the general management and the marketing roles, then everything else, and watch 60% of your classmates land multiple offers and pick from the litter ("Do I do Barclays in London or Bain in San Fran?") -- all the while you haven't even been to your first interview yet.

Not that any of this helps you with school choice really, but I thought it important to mention. Similarly, although you are likely aware, landing PE or VC is next to impossible (im not tooting my own horn here, I'm just telling it like it is - I admit I was just lucky) and PE in particular, without a banking background, is virtually completely impossible.
 1   2   3   4