GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 17 Oct 2019, 13:33

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 21 Oct 2013
Posts: 411
Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jan 2014, 13:56
1
3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

72% (01:05) correct 28% (01:13) wrong based on 391 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation was unconstitutional, the Supreme Court heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

(A) heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation
(B) had heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation
(C) has heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation
(D) has heard cases in which lawyers debated what has constituted segregation
(E) was hearing cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation


Hi, I want to know why it is "has", please.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Apr 2013
Posts: 112
Re: Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jan 2014, 14:14
3
goodyear2013 wrote:
Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation was unconstitutional, the Supreme Court heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

(A) heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation
(B) had heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation
(C) has heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation
(D) has heard cases in which lawyers debated what has constituted segregation
(E) was hearing cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation


Hi, I want to know why it is "has", please.



From 1954 to till now, Supreme Court is still hearing cases in which lawyers are debating what constituted segregation.

Since the action started in the past and continuing in the present, present perfect needs to be used.

So "usage of has" is correct.
_________________
Maadhu

MGMAT1 - 540 ( Trying to improve )
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 26 May 2014
Posts: 17
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
WE: Design (Manufacturing)
Re: Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Sep 2014, 21:12
1
goodyear2013 wrote:
Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation was unconstitutional, the Supreme Court heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

(A) heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation
(B) had heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation
(C) has heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation
(D) has heard cases in which lawyers debated what has constituted segregation
(E) was hearing cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation


Hi, I want to know why it is "has", please.


Usually words like since,within....is followed by has + verb-ed..can eliminate most choices.
VP
VP
User avatar
D
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1007
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Reviews Badge
Re: Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jun 2017, 11:19
IMO C
It correctly indicates that the activitity is still going on


Sent from my ONE E1003 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
_________________
Please give kudos if you find my answers useful
Intern
Intern
User avatar
S
Joined: 20 Jul 2016
Posts: 25
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
Re: Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jun 2017, 09:04
Why is D wrong? What is wrong with "has" constituted?
_________________
Regards,
Nitish

+1 kudos if you found this post useful!
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 17 Feb 2016
Posts: 90
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V36
GPA: 3.12
WE: Education (Internet and New Media)
Reviews Badge
Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jun 2017, 09:51
1
Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation was unconstitutional, the Supreme Court heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

The question tests the knowledge on

Meaning clarity, Tenses, Verb Usage



Meaning
Supreme Court ruled segregation was unconstitutional (At The Past)
From that time, there has been intense debate in Supreme Court as what can be categorized as constitution segregation (At past and present)

POE
Please consider the Red flag "Since"- Present perfect should be used
Options A, B, E can be eliminated due to the wrong usage of tenses

(A) heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation [Past]
(B) had heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation [Past perfect]
(C) has heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation
(D) has heard cases in which lawyers debated what has constituted segregation
(E) was hearing cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation [Past Continuous]

Between C and D
D. There is an ambiguity in meaning. This option says that the lawyers heard only the cases in which there has been a debate on constituted segregation
Hence Option C
_________________
Never stop fighting until you arrive at your destined place - that is, the unique you. Have an aim in life, continuously acquire knowledge, work hard, and have the perseverance to realise the great life. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: enjoying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 5095
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jun 2017, 11:07
Top Contributor
Doesn't look like a Gmattish question. The shift of tense is blatantly gross.
It is accepted that the preposition 'since' entails a present perfect tense. When you use perfect tense for the main part, you must maintain that tense in other parts too. However, it is not clear why all the choices including those that use the perfect tense for the main part are not using the present perfect such as 'has debated' and 'has constituted' for the other parts too, including the supposedly correct choice C.
_________________
If you can't sync with the vibe of GMAT, you had better think!!!
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58402
Re: Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2018, 08:12
goodyear2013 wrote:
Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation was unconstitutional, the Supreme Court heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation.

(A) heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation
(B) had heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation
(C) has heard cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation
(D) has heard cases in which lawyers debated what has constituted segregation
(E) was hearing cases in which lawyers debated what constituted segregation


Hi, I want to know why it is "has", please.


KAPLAN OFFICIAL EXPLANATION:



Since 1954 means that you're dealing with a process that began in the past and is still in progress. Therefore, has heard is better than heard, had heard, or was hearing because the perfect tense (has heard) describes a situation that began in the past and continues into the present. Eliminate (A), (B), and (E). (D) is wrong because changing constituted into the perfect has constituted unnecessarily changes the meaning of the sentence. Go with (C).
_________________
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 5918
Re: Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Oct 2019, 09:49
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation   [#permalink] 11 Oct 2019, 09:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Since 1954, when the Supreme Court ruled that segregation

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne