OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONProject SC Butler: Day 173: Sentence Correction (SC2)
Since 1967, Federal Reserve Banks
have refused to process through regular bank channels any checks that do not have magnetic-ink coding..
A)
have refused to process through regular bank channels any
checks that do not have magnetic-ink codingB)
refuse to process any checks without magnetic-ink coding through regular bank channels
C) have refused to process any checks through regular
bank channels without magnetic-ink codingD)
refuse to process any checks through regular bank channels that do not have magnetic-ink coding
E) have refused to process any checks through regular
bank channels unless they have
magnetic-ink coding• HIGHLIGHTSYou need only two things to solve this SC question.
(1) Know that
SINCE + a point in time is a clue that
we probably need present perfect verb tense, which bridges past and present.
-- present perfect construction: has/have + past participle (verbED) (have + refused)
-- present perfect is used for events that started in the past but continue into the present moment or remain true in the present
-- the present perfect (
have refused) indicates that the refusal began in the past and it is continuing into the present moment.
Correct:
I have known him formally since last year. (I still know him.)
Correct:
Since the beginning of 2019, the Gun Violence Archive has recorded 329 mass shootings in the United States. here (2) know that when a noun is modified, the modifier should be as close as possible to the noun that it modifies.
If you are in doubt, and if all else is equal grammatically and logically, pick the option that places the modifier closest to its noun.
• Split #1: Since and verb tenseSince is often a verb tense marker.
Since + date or time marker usually requires present perfect.
The correct verb in this sentence is
have refused.
Since 1967 Federal Reserve Banks have refused to do XYZ → → the banks are still refusing to do XYZ (now).
Options B and D incorrectly use
refusedEliminate B and D
• Split #2 - Keep the noun modifier close to the nounWhat must have magnetic-ink coding? The checks.
("Regular bank channels" do not get stamped with magnetic ink, coded or not.)
Compare options A, C, and E:
A) Since 1967, Federal Reserve Banks
have refused to process through regular bank channels any checks that do not have magnetic-ink coding..
--
magnetic-link coding modifies
checksC) Since 1967, Federal Reserve Banks
have refused to process any checks through regular bank channels without magnetic-ink coding.
-- [without]
magnetic-ink coding seems to modify bank channels
E) Since 1967, Federal Reserve Banks
have refused to process any checks through regular bank channels unless they have magnetic-ink coding.
-- [unless they have]
magnetic-ink coding seems to modify bank channels
It may seem to some as if choosing (A) is an easy decision.
I don't think that choosing (A) is all that easy.
The choice is not easy because option A seems "interrupted."
Between the verb
have refused to process and its object,
checks, is a prepositional phrase:
through regular bank channels.Even native speakers are likely to avoid the separation of a verb from its direct object.
But that separation is preferable to a noun modifier that is separated from its noun that creates confusion, nonsense, or both.
One more clue that (A) is correct lies in its use of a
that-clause.
...
checks that do not have magnetic-ink coding
The
that information cannot modify anything except checks because
that clauses are restrictive.
Options C and E place "magnetic-ink coding" right next to
channels and too far from
checks.
Eliminate C and E.
The correct answer is A• NOTESWe should check to see whether we need present perfect with a few other "cue" words. The most common are
for, recently, just, and
yet.
Often the
since is not placed at the beginning of the sentence.
That fact does not matter. We still check for (and probably use) present perfect.
See OG Verbal Review 2020 SC # 256, and OG 2020 #821Strategy tip: because C and E say essentially the same thing, choose A. You may not be able to explain why A is different from C and E, but you do know that A
is different.
Channels is not a logical antecedent for
they. I do not think the pronoun is ambiguous.
I think the noun modifier is in the wrong place in both C and E no matter what else is wrong.COMMENTSI know that most of you try to strike a balance between challenging yourself and not worrying too much about levels.
I post good questions that I can find.
I have found many 550 level questions.
I have found hundreds—maybe thousands—of bad questions at allegedly higher levels.
Among other things, SC Butler allows you to review what you know, to think through what you might not be sure about, and just as importantly, to take educated guesses about unfamiliar constructions.
Even the best of you will not be sure of two or three of your SC answers. You will make an educated guess in no more than 90 seconds.
I think,
eakabuah , that it was you who made the wise comment that level of difficulty varies with the question and the person.
Many of you will wonder about levels no matter what I say. That's okay, too.
Whatever it takes to get you through.
All of you.
Today I will give kudos to good explanations of correct answers.
The explanations are good.