Last visit was: 28 Apr 2026, 20:43 It is currently 28 Apr 2026, 20:43
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
generis
User avatar
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Last visit: 18 Jun 2022
Posts: 5,258
Own Kudos:
37,737
 [15]
Given Kudos: 9,464
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,258
Kudos: 37,737
 [15]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
13
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
generis
User avatar
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Last visit: 18 Jun 2022
Posts: 5,258
Own Kudos:
37,737
 [11]
Given Kudos: 9,464
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,258
Kudos: 37,737
 [11]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
chaitralirr
Joined: 17 Mar 2019
Last visit: 07 Oct 2021
Posts: 363
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 35
Location: India
Concentration: Healthcare, General Management
Schools:
GPA: 3.75
WE:Pharmaceuticals (Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals)
Schools:
Posts: 363
Kudos: 291
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Doer01
Joined: 19 Sep 2017
Last visit: 28 Oct 2021
Posts: 215
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 160
Location: United Kingdom
GPA: 3.9
WE:Account Management (Other)
Posts: 215
Kudos: 166
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,
IMO E.

Placement of the modifier “ that do not have magnetic-ink coding” is one of the deciding factor in choosing the correct answer choice.
Use of “Since” in non underlined portion demands the use of present tense. Hence B & D could be rejected easily.
Now, from original sentence it is clear that it is the cheque that could/could not have a magnetic-ink coding, reject C.
A has awkward construction.
We are left with E. Here, “they” is a bit ambiguous because it could refer to either Cheques or Channels but I ignored it since cheques are the only logical antecedent.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Ashokshiva
Joined: 15 Nov 2015
Last visit: 25 Sep 2023
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
171
 [2]
Given Kudos: 178
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
GPA: 3.7
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
Posts: 132
Kudos: 171
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO A

Since 1967, Federal Reserve Banks have refused to process through regular bank channels any checks that do not have magnetic-ink coding.

A) have refused to process through regular bank channels any checks that do not have magnetic-ink coding
Looks ok, corrrect verb tense and modifier

B) refuse to process any checks without magnetic-ink coding through regular bank channels
Wrong verb tense, present perfect is preferred for sentences that have"since"

C) have refused to process any checks through regular bank channels without magnetic-ink coding
Wrong modifier, Magnetic ink coding should modify checks

D) refuse to process any checks through regular bank channels that do not have magnetic-ink coding
Wrong verb tense, present perfect is preferred for sentences that have"since"

E) have refused to process any checks through regular bank channels unless they have magnetic-ink coding
Pronoun ambiguity, "they" can refer either "checks" or " channels"
User avatar
devangpandey007
Joined: 09 May 2019
Last visit: 15 Dec 2025
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 49
Status:Waiting for results
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39
GPA: 3.8
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My answer is E.

B and D are out because of the usage of wrong tense. The correct tense that should be used it Present Perfect Tense to show that the event started in the past but continues to happen in present.

C is out because of the modifier "without magnetic-ink coding" which distorts the meaning by indicating that the bank channels might have magnetic ink coding.

Between A and E, I don't have any specific reason for eliminating A except the fact that A doesn't seem right in terms of the construction.
User avatar
Raxit85
Joined: 22 Feb 2018
Last visit: 02 Aug 2025
Posts: 761
Own Kudos:
1,204
 [1]
Given Kudos: 135
Posts: 761
Kudos: 1,204
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Imo. C

Since 1967, Federal Reserve Banks have refused to process through regular bank channels any checks that do not have magnetic-ink coding.

A) have refused to process through regular bank channels any checks that do not have magnetic-ink coding - Modifier error.

B) refuse to process any checks without magnetic-ink coding through regular bank channels - Verb error (as since is used, present perfect tense is required)

C) have refused to process any checks through regular bank channels without magnetic-ink coding - No error

D) refuse to process any checks through regular bank channels that do not have magnetic-ink coding -Verb error (as since is used, present perfect tense is required)

E) have refused to process any checks through regular bank channels unless they have magnetic-ink coding - Pronoun error
User avatar
joohwangie
Joined: 17 Jan 2019
Last visit: 27 Apr 2026
Posts: 253
Own Kudos:
218
 [1]
Given Kudos: 56
Concentration: Leadership, Sustainability
Schools: Stanford '26
Products:
Schools: Stanford '26
Posts: 253
Kudos: 218
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Since 1967, Federal Reserve Banks have refused to process through regular bank channels any checks that do not have magnetic-ink coding.

federal reserve banks have refused since 1967 till now, therefore, have refused must be used


A) have refused to process through regular bank channels any checks that do not have magnetic-ink coding -- sounds good, that do not have magnetic-ink coding directly refer to checks

B) refuse to process any checks without magnetic-ink coding through regular bank channels

C) have refused to process any checks through regular bank channels without magnetic-ink coding --- seems like without magnetic-ink coding is modifying bank channels not checks

D) refuse to process any checks through regular bank channels that do not have magnetic-ink coding

E) have refused to process any checks through regular bank channels unless they have magnetic-ink coding -- they can refer to checks or bank channels



IMO, A
User avatar
ccheryn
Joined: 15 Jun 2019
Last visit: 05 Nov 2022
Posts: 133
Own Kudos:
221
 [1]
Given Kudos: 123
Posts: 133
Kudos: 221
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Since 1967, Federal Reserve Banks have refused to process through regular bank channels any checks that do not have magnetic-ink coding.

A) have refused to process through regular bank channels any checks that do not have magnetic-ink coding (sequence of events has to be maintained in the preposition phrase, so the precedence of regular bank channels before any checks dont seem appropriate as C and E has those already. so lets keep and move ............. )



B) refuse to process any checks without magnetic-ink coding through regular bank channels(since 1967 has the sequence marker applicable till now, so present perfect have is necessary. absence of it makes this option wrong)


C) have refused to process any checks through regular bank channels without magnetic-ink coding(without is modifying the bank channels, this gives wrong meaning. so c is clearly out. )



D) refuse to process any checks through regular bank channels that do not have magnetic-ink coding(since 1967 has the sequence marker applicable till now, so present perfect have is necessary. absence of it makes this option wrong)



E) have refused to process any checks through regular bank channels unless they have magnetic-ink coding(here in the dependent clause the usage of they gives ambiguous meaning to bank channels , federal reserve banks or checks. so this also wrong. )



after removing c and e, we are left with only option A . so this may be correct choice. so ans is A
User avatar
Shivan21
Joined: 05 Apr 2019
Last visit: 13 Jul 2022
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
107
 [1]
Given Kudos: 65
Posts: 55
Kudos: 107
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
generis

Project SC Butler: Day 173: Sentence Correction (SC2)


For SC butler Questions Click Here


Since 1967, Federal Reserve Banks have refused to process through regular bank channels any checks that do not have magnetic-ink coding.

A) have refused to process through regular bank channels any checks that do not have magnetic-ink coding

B) refuse to process any checks without magnetic-ink coding through regular bank channels

C) have refused to process any checks through regular bank channels without magnetic-ink coding

D) refuse to process any checks through regular bank channels that do not have magnetic-ink coding

E) have refused to process any checks through regular bank channels unless they have magnetic-ink coding


Since the action is continuing till present time, Present Perfect tense (have+past participle) is required. So B & D are our for using wrong tense.

In C "without magnetic-ink coding" modifies "bank channels" rather than "checks".

In E the pronoun "they" doesn't have a clear referent. It can be "checks", "bank channels" or "Federal reserve banks". If we go by the nearest plural noun, then "they" is referring to "bank channels" which is incorrect.
User avatar
J2S2019
Joined: 10 Jan 2017
Last visit: 24 Sep 2022
Posts: 268
Own Kudos:
270
 [1]
Given Kudos: 371
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 268
Kudos: 270
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO the correct answer is A

Since 1967, Federal Reserve Banks have refused to process through regular bank channels any checks that do not have magnetic-ink coding.

A) have refused to process through regular bank channels any checks that do not have magnetic-ink coding - Present perfect tense is required, as we have the word "since 1967...." , we need to justify the tense with something that started in the past & the effect of which is still in the present; "any checks [color=#00a651]that ....." - Restrictive clause use with "that..." properly modifies checks - No error - CORRECT

B) refuse to process any checks without magnetic-ink coding through regular bank channels - Tense error, Incorrect

C) have refused to process any checks through regular bank channels without magnetic-ink coding - changes the meaning of the sentence - INCORRECT

D) refuse to process any checks through regular bank channels that do not have magnetic-ink coding - Tense error, Incorrect

E) have refused to process any checks through regular bank channels unless they have magnetic-ink coding - "They" creates ambiguity, logically it can refer back to "regular bank channels unless", "any checks" or " Federal Reserve Banks" - Not clear - INCORRECT
User avatar
mykrasovski
Joined: 17 Aug 2018
Last visit: 17 Apr 2022
Posts: 340
Own Kudos:
325
 [1]
Given Kudos: 253
Location: United States
WE:General Management (Other)
Posts: 340
Kudos: 325
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Since 1967, Federal Reserve Banks have refused to process through regular bank channels any checks that do not have magnetic-ink coding.

Quick read-through reveals that the sentence tests tenses, and there is a 3-2 split. Because there is a time indicator "since" and we are clearly talking about the action in the past that has an effect up until today, we should look for Present Perfect tense which has a have + V-ed structure. Hence, we can eliminate B and D very quickly.

A) have refused to process through regular bank channels any checks that do not have magnetic-ink coding
- Correct. Meaning makes sense: banks refuse to process checks (... which checks? those that... ) that do not have special coding.

B) refuse to process any checks without magnetic-ink coding through regular bank channels
- Incorrect. See above.

C) have refused to process any checks through regular bank channels without magnetic-ink coding
- Incorrect. Channels without magnetic-ink coding? This does not make any sense...

D) refuse to process any checks through regular bank channels that do not have magnetic-ink coding
- Incorrect. See above.

E) have refused to process any checks through regular bank channels unless they have magnetic-ink coding
- Incorrect. Same meaning trouble that we had in C.


generis this question seems to be a 550-600 level question. Would you agree?
User avatar
eakabuah
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 May 2019
Last visit: 15 Jun 2022
Posts: 774
Own Kudos:
1,144
 [1]
Given Kudos: 101
Posts: 774
Kudos: 1,144
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A timeframe effective 1967 is being considered here. So the right tense is the present perfect tense. We can, therefore, eliminate options B and D.

The dealbreaker between A, C, and E is what magnetic ink coding modifies in the sentence. Magnetic ink coding is an adjectival phrase and hence should be placed next to the noun it modifies.
In option C, it is modifying bank channels, which does not make sense. It is not the bank channels that need to have magnetic ink coding, but rather the checks that must have magnetic ink coding. Option C can, therefore, be eliminated.

In option E, there is a pronoun ambiguity. they can refer to either checks or bank channels. Hence we can eliminate E.

The right answer is option A. It uses a that clause that do not have magnetic ink coding in this case acting as an adverbial clause to appropriately modify checks.
avatar
Shishou
Joined: 10 Jun 2019
Last visit: 08 Apr 2021
Posts: 103
Own Kudos:
92
 [1]
Given Kudos: 112
Products:
Posts: 103
Kudos: 92
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Since 1967, Federal Reserve Banks have refused to process through regular bank channels any checks that do not have magnetic-ink coding.
I feel the answer is A
A) have refused to process through regular bank channels any checks that do not have magnetic-ink coding this is the right answer. It communicates that the Fed won't pass checks without this coding

B) refuse to process any checks without magnetic-ink coding through regular bank channels
the present perfect is needed here since it's a directive that occurred in the past and is still relevant in the present
C) have refused to process any checks through regular bank channels without magnetic-ink coding
This could be misread as the Fed refusing to work with banks that do not have magnetic coding while it's the checks that must have the coding
D) refuse to process any checks through regular bank channels that do not have magnetic-ink coding
the present perfect is needed here and ascribes magnetic coding to bank channels
E) have refused to process any checks through regular bank channels unless they have magnetic-ink codingthey could logically mean either checks or bank channels and that makes this construction ambiguous
User avatar
generis
User avatar
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Last visit: 18 Jun 2022
Posts: 5,258
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9,464
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,258
Kudos: 37,737
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mykrasovski



generis this question seems to be a 550-600 level question. Would you agree?
See the stats.

Answer: No. :lol: :lol: :lol:

I did wonder whether the question were a low level one, but I doubted so.
(A lower-level question would be just fine. We need to practice all levels.
And I post what I can find.)

I will replicate my "be a guest Butler poster for a day" message here, and I will change the level from 650 to 600:

Forum members: If you would like to do so, please provide me, via PM, with questions to post in SC Butler. If I approve them, you can post the questions under the Butler banner as a guest poster. If you do not have an official explanation, I will write one.
For every question you provide that is 600 level or higher and that is publishable, I will happily give you the Butler slot for that day's original post and a kudos when you post the question for the question itself

Meaning: you post the question after I show you how to do so with the Butler banner.

You also have the opportunity to post the OE (official explanation) but I must see a draft and approve of it first.

I will post the OE to the Butler questions as soon as I can -- I am caught up in something important.
User avatar
mykrasovski
Joined: 17 Aug 2018
Last visit: 17 Apr 2022
Posts: 340
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 253
Location: United States
WE:General Management (Other)
Posts: 340
Kudos: 325
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
generis,

Alright, I look forward to the OE :)

Good luck with "something important"!
User avatar
mykrasovski
Joined: 17 Aug 2018
Last visit: 17 Apr 2022
Posts: 340
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 253
Location: United States
WE:General Management (Other)
Posts: 340
Kudos: 325
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
I think, eakabuah , that it was you who made the wise comment that level of difficulty varies with the question and the person.

This is very true. This becomes very obvious in Quant. If one know hows how to quickly "crack" a pretty tough problem, it does not mean that the question is easy.

Quote:
I post good questions that I can find.
I have found many 550 level questions.
I have found hundreds—maybe thousands—of bad questions at higher levels.

Among other things, SC Butler allows you to review what you know, to think through what you might not be sure about, and just as importantly, to take educated guesses about unfamiliar constructions.

This is why, I dare say, many people appreciate SC Butler and your contribution. Those who spent some time preparing for the test realize that (1) it is not easy to find good quality questions outside of the Official Guide and (2) it takes a huge effort to find & dissect such quality questions regularly. So, thank you for doing what you are doing!
User avatar
generis
User avatar
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Last visit: 18 Jun 2022
Posts: 5,258
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9,464
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,258
Kudos: 37,737
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I have posted the official explanation HERE.
User avatar
generis
User avatar
Senior SC Moderator
Joined: 22 May 2016
Last visit: 18 Jun 2022
Posts: 5,258
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9,464
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,258
Kudos: 37,737
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mykrasovski

This is why, I dare say, many people appreciate SC Butler and your contribution. Those who spent some time preparing for the test realize that (1) it is not easy to find good quality questions outside of the Official Guide and (2) it takes a huge effort to find & dissect such quality questions regularly. So, thank you for doing what you are doing!
mykrasovski , you are very welcome. :)
User avatar
zhanbo
Joined: 27 Feb 2017
Last visit: 07 Jul 2024
Posts: 1,464
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 114
Location: United States (WA)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V42
GRE 1: Q169 V168
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V42
GRE 1: Q169 V168
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 1,464
Kudos: 2,480
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
generis
mykrasovski



generis this question seems to be a 550-600 level question. Would you agree?
See the stats.

Answer: No. :lol: :lol: :lol:

I did wonder whether the question were a low level one, but I doubted so.
(A lower-level question would be just fine. We need to practice all levels.
And I post what I can find.)

I will replicate my "be a guest Butler poster for a day" message here, and I will change the level from 650 to 600:
Forum members: If you would like to do so, please provide me, via PM, with questions to post in SC Butler. If I approve them, you can post the questions under the Butler banner as a guest poster.
For every question you provide that is 600 level or higher and that is publishable (good and permitted), I will give you one Butler slot for that day's original post or I will give you a kudos for any good post of yours that you choose.

Meaning: you post the question after I show you how to do so with the Butler banner.

You also have the opportunity to post the OE (official explanation) but I must see a draft and approve of it first.

I will post the OE to the Butler questions as soon as I can -- I am caught up in something important.

FWIW, I got this question wrong. So for me, it is definitely a 700 question!
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
507 posts
363 posts