Last visit was: 20 Jul 2024, 00:37 It is currently 20 Jul 2024, 00:37
Toolkit
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

# Since 1975 the number of women in upper-level management in American c

SORT BY:
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 94421
Own Kudos [?]: 642430 [3]
Given Kudos: 86332
Director
Joined: 09 Aug 2017
Posts: 686
Own Kudos [?]: 426 [0]
Given Kudos: 778
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Posts: 6049
Own Kudos [?]: 4767 [0]
Given Kudos: 463
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
Intern
Joined: 12 Aug 2017
Posts: 44
Own Kudos [?]: 56 [0]
Given Kudos: 75
Concentration: General Management, Marketing
Re: Since 1975 the number of women in upper-level management in American c [#permalink]
Since 1975 the number of women in upper-level management in American corporations have increased by 25 percent; female executives’ salaries, however, still lag behind those of their male counterparts.

(A) have increased by 25 percent; female executives’ salaries, however, still lag the number should use "has" - SV Agreement Error
(B) has increased by 25 percent, however much their salaries lag much should be used with uncountable nouns and their is ambiguous
(C) have increased 25 percent; female executives’ salaries, however, still have lagged the number should use "has" - SV Agreement Error
(D) has increased by 25 percent; female executives’ salaries, however, still lag Correct
(E) have increased 25 percent; their salaries, however, still lag the number should use "has" - SV Agreement Error
Director
Joined: 21 Jun 2017
Posts: 632
Own Kudos [?]: 540 [0]
Given Kudos: 4092
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 620 Q47 V30
GMAT 3: 650 Q48 V31
GPA: 3.1
WE:Corporate Finance (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: Since 1975 the number of women in upper-level management in American c [#permalink]
E is also wrong because it has a semicolon and besides this we have placed a dependent clause marker - their . We should have used comma fanboys instead.

Am I right with this ?

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Joined: 23 May 2018
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Location: India
GPA: 3
Re: Since 1975 the number of women in upper-level management in American c [#permalink]
Since 1975 the number of women in upper-level management in American corporations have increased by 25 percent; female executives’ salaries, however, still lag behind those of their male counterparts.

(A) have increased by 25 percent; female executives’ salaries, however, still lag: when "the number" is used verb should be singular "has must be used" - Subject Verb Agreement Error
(B) has increased by 25 percent, however much their salaries lag: The sentence seems ambiguous when compared to the eventual answer "D"
(C) have increased 25 percent; female executives’ salaries, however, still have lagged Same error as A
(D) has increased by 25 percent; female executives’ salaries, however, still lag "Correct"
(E) have increased 25 percent; their salaries, however, still lag the number should use "has" - Same error as A
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Mar 2018
Posts: 262
Own Kudos [?]: 357 [0]
Given Kudos: 270
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37 (Online)
Re: Since 1975 the number of women in upper-level management in American c [#permalink]
Bunuel wrote:
Since 1975 the number of women in upper-level management in American corporations have increased by 25 percent; female executives’ salaries, however, still lag behind those of their male counterparts.

(A) have increased by 25 percent; female executives’ salaries, however, still lag
(B) has increased by 25 percent, however much their salaries lag
(C) have increased 25 percent; female executives’ salaries, however, still have lagged
(D) has increased by 25 percent; female executives’ salaries, however, still lag
(E) have increased 25 percent; their salaries, however, still lag

Bunuel , GMATNinja
Thanks for the post.
I agree with the OA as it is the best answer out of the lot, but want to clarify one thing.

In the below highlighted part of the sentence -
Bunuel wrote:
Since 1975 the number of women in upper-level management in American corporations have increased by 25 percent; female executives’ salaries, however, still lag behind those of their male counterparts.

'their' should correspond to female executives as it is the only logical antecedent.
But the problem is that female executives is not a noun in the underlined portion right now (female executives’) and cannot be the antecedent. Hence 'their' grammatically is pointing to the nearest noun 'American Corporations', making the meaning absurd.

Would you agree if the sentence would be of the below form -

Since 1975 the number of women in upper-level management in American corporations have increased by 25 percent; salaries of female executives, however, still lag behind those of their male counterparts.

According to me, it would have been both parallel and logical in meaning.

Director
Joined: 21 Jun 2017
Posts: 632
Own Kudos [?]: 540 [0]
Given Kudos: 4092
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 620 Q47 V30
GMAT 3: 650 Q48 V31
GPA: 3.1
WE:Corporate Finance (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: Since 1975 the number of women in upper-level management in American c [#permalink]
ShankSouljaBoi wrote:
E is also wrong because it has a semicolon and besides this we have placed a dependent clause marker - their . We should have used comma fanboys instead.

Am I right with this ?

Posted from my mobile device

Can any kind soul address this ?
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6984
Own Kudos [?]: 64537 [2]
Given Kudos: 1823
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Re: Since 1975 the number of women in upper-level management in American c [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Bunuel wrote:
Since 1975 the number of women in upper-level management in American corporations have increased by 25 percent; female executives’ salaries, however, still lag behind those of their male counterparts.

(A) have increased by 25 percent; female executives’ salaries, however, still lag
(B) has increased by 25 percent, however much their salaries lag
(C) have increased 25 percent; female executives’ salaries, however, still have lagged
(D) has increased by 25 percent; female executives’ salaries, however, still lag
(E) have increased 25 percent; their salaries, however, still lag

Bunuel , GMATNinja
Thanks for the post.
I agree with the OA as it is the best answer out of the lot, but want to clarify one thing.

In the below highlighted part of the sentence -
Bunuel wrote:
Since 1975 the number of women in upper-level management in American corporations have increased by 25 percent; female executives’ salaries, however, still lag behind those of their male counterparts.

'their' should correspond to female executives as it is the only logical antecedent.
But the problem is that female executives is not a noun in the underlined portion right now (female executives’) and cannot be the antecedent. Hence 'their' grammatically is pointing to the nearest noun 'American Corporations', making the meaning absurd.

Would you agree if the sentence would be of the below form -

Since 1975 the number of women in upper-level management in American corporations have increased by 25 percent; salaries of female executives, however, still lag behind those of their male counterparts.

According to me, it would have been both parallel and logical in meaning.

First of all, you would need to use "HAS increased", not "have increased", since we need a singular verb to agree with the singular subject ("number").

Also, "their" is a possessive pronoun, so it can absolutely refer to the possessive, female executives', as is the case in the correct answer choice (D).

As discussed in this post, a possessive pronoun can also refer to a subject noun (i.e. "The fans want their money back." or "The female executives all met their sales quotas.").

ShankSouljaBoi wrote:
E is also wrong because it has a semicolon and besides this we have placed a dependent clause marker - their . We should have used comma fanboys instead.

Am I right with this ?

Posted from my mobile device

"Their salaries, however, still lag behind those of their male counterparts" is an independent clause! Here, have another example:

"Malik went to the concert. He thought it was terrible."

Sure, the second sentence doesn't make any sense without the first sentence, but that doesn't mean it's a dependent clause. It is a complete thought with a subject and a verb and can stand alone -- it does not need to be incorporated into the first sentence.

So the semicolon in (E) is perfectly fine. The problem is that we need a singular verb to agree with the singular subject (number).

I hope this helps!
Re: Since 1975 the number of women in upper-level management in American c [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6984 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
236 posts