Aishna1034
KarishmaB Could you please elaborate on option B. If they dont take medical practitioner's help, then there are chances they are not taking it as prescribed( if they would have consulted the practitioner). Isnt this giving a strengthening possibility?
Aishna1034 I'll add my two cents here. You're missing a critical distinction.
Option B talks about people who
never seek medical help for sinus infections. This means they:
- Never get prescribed perxicillin
- Never take perxicillin at all
- Cannot contribute to perxicillin resistance
Why Your Logic Breaks Down:You're thinking: "If they don't consult a doctor → they might self-medicate incorrectly → this strengthens the hypothesis"
But here's the problem:
Bacteria can only develop resistance to an antibiotic when they're actually exposed to it. People who never seek medical help aren't taking perxicillin (prescribed or otherwise), so their bacteria never encounter the drug and can't develop resistance to it.
The Hypothesis's Specific Focus:The health officials' hypothesis is about
prescribed perxicillin users who don't complete their course properly. It's this group that creates resistant bacteria by:
- Starting the antibiotic (killing weaker bacteria)
- Stopping early (allowing stronger bacteria to survive and multiply)
- Creating a resistant strain
Option B describes a completely different population that's irrelevant to the resistance problem.
Strategic Pattern Recognition:In GMAT CR strengthen/weaken questions about cause-and-effect:
- Always identify the
specific population the conclusion addresses
- Eliminate options about
different populations (like B)
- Focus on options that directly impact the
causal mechanism (like D, which explains
why patients stop taking medication early)
You can practice similar Critical Reasoning questions
here (these are official questions) - select
Strengthen/Weaken under CR and choose the difficulty level based on your current understanding.