617Enigma
As I understood it, during last years round 1 admissions cycle the applicants who were for sure not going to receive interviews were rejected before the end of December. I believe the forum for the prior year admissions cycle shows many candidates received definitive "Dings" - to use the colloquial term - in the last week or two of December. Although Sloan's website indicated that some candidates who would not be granted an interview would receive their decision early in the current round one admissions cycle, this does not appear to have happened yet and the February 6th deadline is almost upon us.
This unfamiliar departure from historical convention has left me, if not the applicant pool as a whole, pondering what caused the change. Did an unprecedented number of candidates in the accepted column politely withdraw their applications after hearing from other top schools in December? Is the AdComm just setting the precedent that no two years will be similar? Since Sloan is my top choice I hope the former is true and Sloan has plenty of room in their upcoming class; however, the evidence available on the internet does not indicate a significant number of last minute interview requests have gone out. The last glimmer of hope is that Sloan has always said they issue interview requests up until the decision day, with the caveat that if invited to interview in the closing days of the round you would actually get your decision after the official decision day - Feb 6th.
There seems to be a lot of confusion around what MIT is doing so i thought i would write this note, felt good to focus my mind on something. Any thoughts on factual additions or subtractions would be appreciated.
Nice post 617Enigma! The invitation rate on the first page indicates 16% invited (and I think there are some not updating their profile). Together with low rate of interview invitation of Sloan, I would think, the tide is pretty much against those are awaiting like me. Anyway, will soon find out the final answer soon.
Just curious, has anyone called in and asked the AdCom regarding this 'weirdo' handling this year? How is the response?