Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 16:11 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 16:11
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
505-555 Level|   Logical Flaw|            
User avatar
souvik101990
User avatar
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Last visit: 11 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,321
Own Kudos:
53,089
 [11]
Given Kudos: 2,326
Location: United States (WA)
Concentration: Leadership, General Management
Schools: Ross '20 (M)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V42 (Online)
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42 (Online)
GPA: 3.8
WE:Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Products:
My Reviews
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: Ross '20 (M)
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42 (Online)
Posts: 4,321
Kudos: 53,089
 [11]
Smith: Meat in the diet is healthy, despite what some people say 07 Apr 2015, 21:08
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

74% (01:03) correct 26% (01:21) wrong based on 888 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Smith: Meat in the diet is healthy, despite what some people say. After all, most doctors do eat meat, and who knows more about health than doctors do?

Which one of the following is a flaw in Smith‟s reasoning?

(A) Attacking the opponents‟ motives instead of their argument

(B) Generalizing on the basis of a sample consisting of a typical cases

(C) Assuming at the outset what the argument claims to establish through reasoning

(D) Appealing to authority, even when different authorities give conflicting advice about an issue

(E) Taking for granted that experts do not act counter to what, according to their expertise, in their best interest
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
E
avatar
veteranrookie
avatar
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Last visit: 15 May 2017
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
5
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 9
Kudos: 5
 [1]
Smith: Meat in the diet is healthy, despite what some people say 14 Apr 2017, 11:08
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OA is (e) ?

Cause the author says that 'Doctors also eat meat'.

So he is trying to say that if I suggest something, (in this case the doctor) I too will follow the same thing.
If the doctor eats meat, it means that he is only following what he tells and suggests other people as healthy. Which is what the author is using to corroborate his statement.



Sent from my MI PAD using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
User avatar
Harsh2111s
User avatar
Joined: 08 May 2019
Last visit: 10 Feb 2021
Posts: 317
Own Kudos:
266
Given Kudos: 54
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
Schools: IIM (D) S.P.Jain Institute (A) XLRI IIML-IPMX '22 NUS '23
GPA: 4
WE:Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
Products:
My Reviews
Schools: IIM (D) S.P.Jain Institute (A) XLRI IIML-IPMX '22 NUS '23
Posts: 317
Kudos: 266
Smith: Meat in the diet is healthy, despite what some people say 27 Feb 2020, 06:56
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I didn't understood option E.

Need help.
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,510
 [2]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,510
 [2]
Smith: Meat in the diet is healthy, despite what some people say 27 Feb 2020, 07:52
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Harsh2111s
I didn't understood option E.

Need help.
Show more
Hello again, Harsh2111s. There is a missing word in (E) that makes it harder to understand if you are not a native English speaker. The amended response should read:

souvik101990
(E) Taking for granted that experts do not act counter to what, according to their expertise, is/lies in their best interest
Show more

This answer indicates that the argument assumes that experts will not act in a way that goes against their better judgment, based on what their training or expertise has taught them to be true. Put simply, a doctor is held up as a paragon of health, since doctors are trained to be experts in matters of good health. The argument is flawed because it does not take into account that most doctors might eat meat despite knowing that it is or could be unhealthy to consume.

I hope that helps clarify the issue. If you have further questions, do not hesitate to ask.

- Andrew
User avatar
SafSin28
User avatar
Joined: 16 Aug 2022
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 73
Own Kudos:
58
Given Kudos: 56
Posts: 73
Kudos: 58
Smith: Meat in the diet is healthy, despite what some people say 08 Jul 2024, 21:26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Smith: Despite what some people say, Meat is Health. Because, most doctors eat meat and they know more about health.

D) Appealing authority, (If doctors do X, then X is true). Only this choice makes a sense.

E) 'Experts do not act against their best interest'. How do we know that doctors' best interest? How do we know that their best interest is right? So, E is OUT!

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
siddhantvarma
User avatar
Joined: 12 May 2024
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 539
Own Kudos:
715
Given Kudos: 196
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q87 V82 DI75
Products:
Forum Quiz
GMAT Focus 1: 635 Q87 V82 DI75
Posts: 539
Kudos: 715
Smith: Meat in the diet is healthy, despite what some people say 10 Nov 2024, 21:29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sindor2001 Let me take a shot at this.

First, let's identify Smith's argument structure:
Conclusion: Meat in the diet is healthy
Premise 1: Most doctors eat meat
Premise 2: Doctors know the most about health

Here's some pre-thinking that tells me what's probably wrong with this reasoning:
Smith is assuming that because doctors (authorities on health) eat meat, meat must be healthy
The argument relies on doctors' personal behavior rather than medical evidence or research
It assumes doctors always act according to what they know is the healthiest. What if doctors in general enjoy meat? What if some people are allergic to meat and doctors actually recommend them to not eat meat?

With that in mind, let's evaluate each option:

A) Attacking motives - No, Smith isn't attacking anyone's motives

B) Atypical sample - No, doctors aren't being presented as an atypical sample

C) Circular reasoning - No, the conclusion isn't assumed in the premises

D) Appeal to authority - No, there's no mention of conflicting advice from different authorities

E) Taking for granted that experts don't act counter to their expertise - YES!

This is the core flaw in Smith's reasoning. Just because doctors know about health doesn't mean they always make the healthiest choices. Experts often act in ways that contradict their professional knowledge (e.g., doctors who smoke)

Therefore, E is the correct answer.
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMATNinjaTwo
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
miag
188 posts