GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 19 Jul 2018, 12:33

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Some philosophers have argued that there exist certain human or natur

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

SVP
SVP
User avatar
V
Status: Preparing for the GMAT
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 1599
Location: Pakistan
GPA: 3.39
Premium Member CAT Tests
Some philosophers have argued that there exist certain human or natur  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Aug 2017, 09:57
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

60% (01:15) correct 40% (01:19) wrong based on 158 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Some philosophers have argued that there exist certain human or natural rights that belong to all human beings by virtue of their humanity. But a review of the laws of different societies shows that the rights accorded a person vary from society to society and even within a society over time. Since there is no right that is universally protected, there are no natural rights. A defender of the theory that natural rights do exist might respond to this objection by arguing that

(A) some human beings do not have any natural rights
(B) some human rights are natural while others derive from a source such as a constitution
(C) people in one society may have natural rights that people in another society lack
(D) all societies have some institution that protects the rights of an individual in that society
(E) natural rights may exist even though they are not protected by some societies

Master GMAT

_________________

Official PS Practice Questions
Press +1 Kudos if this post is helpful

Director
Director
avatar
P
Joined: 14 Nov 2014
Posts: 662
Location: India
Schools: Rotman '20 (S)
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.76
Re: Some philosophers have argued that there exist certain human or natur  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Aug 2017, 10:26
SajjadAhmad wrote:
Some philosophers have argued that there exist certain human or natural rights that belong to all human beings by virtue of their humanity. But a review of the laws of different societies shows that the rights accorded a person vary from society to society and even within a society over time. Since there is no right that is universally protected, there are no natural rights. A defender of the theory that natural rights do exist might respond to this objection by arguing that

(A) some human beings do not have any natural rights
(B) some human rights are natural while others derive from a source such as a constitution
(C) people in one society may have natural rights that people in another society lack
(D) all societies have some institution that protects the rights of an individual in that society
(E) natural rights may exist even though they are not protected by some societies

Master GMAT


"Since there is no right that is universally protected, there are no natural rights"

E says that there are natural right but they are not protected by some societies ...

Not entirely convinced , but by POE ,E seems consistent with the Argument ...Rest other out of scope to me ....
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 07 Jun 2017
Posts: 177
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT 1: 660 Q46 V38
GPA: 3.6
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Some philosophers have argued that there exist certain human or natur  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Aug 2017, 22:56
E
E clearly Says there is natural Right. But They are not protected by Some society
_________________

Regards,
Naveen
email: nkmungila@gmail.com
Please press kudos if you like this post

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 12 Mar 2017
Posts: 100
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
Re: Some philosophers have argued that there exist certain human or natur  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Mar 2018, 13:05
VeritasPrepKarishma , mikemcgarry , MagooshExpert

I am confused in between B and E. Could anyone please elaborate?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Feb 2018
Posts: 379
Re: Some philosophers have argued that there exist certain human or natur  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Mar 2018, 22:00
How can E be right, when it says - human rights 'may' exist. The word 'may' implies a possibility...but not a guarantee...the sentence is weak.

But, to put one's point, a defender has to be assertive in his tone. Thus, I feel B is a better option. Had E been assertive by saying 'do' instead of 'may' it would have been the answer.

Sent from my Lenovo K53a48 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Expert Post
1 KUDOS received
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
P
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 8128
Location: Pune, India
Re: Some philosophers have argued that there exist certain human or natur  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Mar 2018, 00:21
1
prateek176 wrote:
VeritasPrepKarishma , mikemcgarry , MagooshExpert

I am confused in between B and E. Could anyone please elaborate?



Argument:

Some philosophers - there exist certain human or natural rights that belong to all human beings by virtue of their humanity.

Another theory - But the rights accorded a person vary from society to society and even within a society over time.
Since there is no right that is universally protected, there are no natural rights.

The other theory negates the theory of some philosophers by saying that since there is no right that is universally protected, there are no natural rights. Just because the rights are not protected, it does not mean that the rights are not there. It is an assumption made by the other theory supporters that if there are natural rights, all societies would protect them.

Question: A defender of the theory that natural rights do exist might respond to this objection by arguing that ...

Choice (E) gives us the logic we discussed above. Hence it is correct.

(B) some human rights are natural while others derive from a source such as a constitution
This statement might be true but it is not relevant to our argument. We are only concerned about whether natural rights exist. Constitutional rights are not a matter of concern at all. We need to give a response to the objection raised by the other theory. (B) does not respond to it. We need something more in line with "the constitution may not safeguard natural rights even though they may exist"
_________________

Karishma
Private Tutor for GMAT
Contact: bansal.karishma@gmail.com

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Feb 2018
Posts: 379
Re: Some philosophers have argued that there exist certain human or natur  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Apr 2018, 05:43
VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
prateek176 wrote:
VeritasPrepKarishma , mikemcgarry , MagooshExpert

I am confused in between B and E. Could anyone please elaborate?



Argument:

Some philosophers - there exist certain human or natural rights that belong to all human beings by virtue of their humanity.

Another theory - But the rights accorded a person vary from society to society and even within a society over time.
Since there is no right that is universally protected, there are no natural rights.

The other theory negates the theory of some philosophers by saying that since there is no right that is universally protected, there are no natural rights. Just because the rights are not protected, it does not mean that the rights are not there. It is an assumption made by the other theory supporters that if there are natural rights, all societies would protect them.

Question: A defender of the theory that natural rights do exist might respond to this objection by arguing that ...

Choice (E) gives us the logic we discussed above. Hence it is correct.

(B) some human rights are natural while others derive from a source such as a constitution
This statement might be true but it is not relevant to our argument. We are only concerned about whether natural rights exist. Constitutional rights are not a matter of concern at all. We need to give a response to the objection raised by the other theory. (B) does not respond to it. We need something more in line with "the constitution may not safeguard natural rights even though they may exist"

Yes now I get the true reason. Many thanks [GRINNING FACE WITH SMILING EYES] [GRINNING FACE WITH SMILING EYES]

Sent from my Lenovo K53a48 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Re: Some philosophers have argued that there exist certain human or natur &nbs [#permalink] 01 Apr 2018, 05:43
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Some philosophers have argued that there exist certain human or natur

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.