GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 19 Jul 2018, 00:42

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Substantive clauses - What caused the \$100 million museum's approval a

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 14 Oct 2012
Posts: 177
Substantive clauses - What caused the \$100 million museum's approval a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2017, 09:11
5
12
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

57% (00:45) correct 43% (00:43) wrong based on 630 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

What caused the \$100 million museum's approval and construction to take 12 years was a combination of the complexity of the financing requirements and the opposition of several small but vocal constituencies.
A)What caused
B)What has caused
C)The thing that caused
D)That which caused
E)Causing
Manager
Joined: 14 Oct 2012
Posts: 177
Substantive clauses - What caused the \$100 million museum's approval a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2017, 09:14
4
1
manishtank1988 wrote:
What caused the \$100 million museum's approval and construction to take 12 years was a combination of the complexity of the financing requirements and the opposition of several small but vocal constituencies.
A)What caused
B)What has caused
C)The thing that caused
D)That which caused
E)Causing

Read the Original Sentence Carefully, Looking for Errors:

The sentence as written contains no errors. The singular relative pronoun "what" is properly used to refer to the singular "a combination": "What caused [these things to happen] was a combination [of other things]." The past tense "caused" is correct, as it matches the non-underlined past tense "was." Plan on selecting (A), but check the other choices to make sure nothing was overlooked.

Scan and Group the Answer Choices:

A quick scan does not reveal any patterns that lead to a useful grouping. The choices are short, so just proceed to analyze them more carefully.

(B) uses the present perfect "has caused," which is not parallel to the past tense "was." Had the sentence said has been a combination ..., then "has caused" would have been parallel. Eliminate (B).

(C) replaces "what" with "the thing that." While this is not grammatically incorrect, it is unnecessarily wordy. Eliminate (C).

(D) replaces "what" with "that which." This is not grammatically incorrect, but it is a less common wording in modern English and it uses two words where one would do. Since there is no reason to switch from "what" to "that which," eliminate (D).

(E) uses the wrong verb tense with "causing." This can be seen by rearranging the original sentence to read A combination of ... was what caused the ... But (E) would read A combination of ... was causing the ..., which distorts the meaning of the sentence. The sentence wants to describe events that happened and were completed in the past. The simple past tense, "was" and "caused," is appropriate here.

As expected, (A) is correct.

TAKEAWAY: Don‘t forget that (A) is correct about 20 percent of the time, just like each of the other choices. Don't be so eager to find errors that you “find” mistakes that aren’t there.
##### General Discussion
Manager
Joined: 14 Oct 2012
Posts: 177
Substantive clauses - What caused the \$100 million museum's approval a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 03 Sep 2017, 09:16
Can anyone/you elaborate as to why C is wrong?
I see it as following -
The thing [that caused the \$100 million museum's approval and construction to take 12 years] was a combination of the complexity of the financing requirements and the opposition of several small but vocal constituencies.
Main clause - The thing [that caused the \$100 million museum's approval and construction to take 12 years] was a combination of the complexity of the financing requirements and the opposition of several small but vocal constituencies.

I understand that this is a substantive clause starting with relative pronoun "what" but i got this question wrong as i only realized it when i saw the answer and explanation. So can anyone please elaborate as to why to choose A compared to C
OR
how to understand as to when A (substantive clause) to use and when to use C(normal construction) ?
Helpful resource: Magoosh Substantive clause - https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/substanti ... -the-gmat/

Originally posted by manishtank1988 on 03 Sep 2017, 09:12.
Last edited by manishtank1988 on 03 Sep 2017, 09:16, edited 1 time in total.
Board of Directors
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3687
Re: Substantive clauses - What caused the \$100 million museum's approval a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2017, 09:19
1
manishtank1988 wrote:
Can anyone/you elaborate as to why C is wrong?
I see it as following -
The thing [that caused the \$100 million museum's approval and construction to take 12 years] was a combination of the complexity of the financing requirements and the opposition of several small but vocal constituencies.
Main clause - The thing [that caused the \$100 million museum's approval and construction to take 12 years] was a combination of the complexity of the financing requirements and the opposition of several small but vocal constituencies.

I understand that this is a substantive clause starting with relative pronoun "what" but i got this question wrong as i only realized it when i saw the answer and explanation. So can anyone please elaborate as to why to choose A compared to C
OR
how to understand as to when A (substantive clause) to use and when to use C(normal construction) ?
Helpful resource: Magoosh Substantive clause - https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/substanti ... -the-gmat/

Hi manishtank1988 ,

The only reason I rejected C is that it says "The thing was a combination".

Meaning wise it is wrong. Combination cannot be a thing. Hence, C is 100% incorrect.

A is using the phrase "what caused something was a combination of X and Y".

Hence, A is correct.

Does that make sense?
_________________

My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place

GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.

Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free

Manager
Joined: 14 Oct 2012
Posts: 177
Re: Substantive clauses - What caused the \$100 million museum's approval a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2017, 09:32
abhimahna wrote:
manishtank1988 wrote:
Can anyone/you elaborate as to why C is wrong?
I see it as following -
The thing [that caused the \$100 million museum's approval and construction to take 12 years] was a combination of the complexity of the financing requirements and the opposition of several small but vocal constituencies.
Main clause - The thing [that caused the \$100 million museum's approval and construction to take 12 years] was a combination of the complexity of the financing requirements and the opposition of several small but vocal constituencies.

I understand that this is a substantive clause starting with relative pronoun "what" but i got this question wrong as i only realized it when i saw the answer and explanation. So can anyone please elaborate as to why to choose A compared to C
OR
how to understand as to when A (substantive clause) to use and when to use C(normal construction) ?
Helpful resource: Magoosh Substantive clause - https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/substanti ... -the-gmat/

Hi manishtank1988 ,

The only reason I rejected C is that it says "The thing was a combination".

Meaning wise it is wrong. Combination cannot be a thing. Hence, C is 100% incorrect.

A is using the phrase "what caused something was a combination of X and Y".

Hence, A is correct.

Does that make sense?

First of all thanks a lot abhimahna for an immediate response - i really appreciate it.
Secondly, i do see that Combination cannot be a thing sounds extremely awkward; however, why can't a "combination" (abstract noun) can't be a "thing" (common noun).
Finally, i would add that i sort of see the point here but i am asking above question just for my clarity.
Thanks a lot for immediate response.
Happy learning
Board of Directors
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3687
Re: Substantive clauses - What caused the \$100 million museum's approval a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2017, 09:41
2
manishtank1988 wrote:

First of all thanks a lot abhimahna for an immediate response - i really appreciate it.
Secondly, i do see that Combination cannot be a thing sounds extremely awkward; however, why can't a "combination" (abstract noun) can't be a "thing" (common noun).
Finally, i would add that i sort of see the point here but i am asking above question just for my clarity.
Thanks a lot for immediate response.
Happy learning

Hi manishtank1988 ,

Well, I donot prefer awkwardness as a reason to reject any option unless I don't have any other option.

As per English usage, a thing should be something physical while "a combination" is not any objector physically existing item. The word combination suggests we are combining two things rather than the two things themselves.

Hence, C is incorrect.

Does that make sense?
_________________

My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place

GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.

Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free

Manager
Joined: 14 Oct 2012
Posts: 177
Re: Substantive clauses - What caused the \$100 million museum's approval a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2017, 10:42
abhimahna wrote:
manishtank1988 wrote:

First of all thanks a lot abhimahna for an immediate response - i really appreciate it.
Secondly, i do see that Combination cannot be a thing sounds extremely awkward; however, why can't a "combination" (abstract noun) can't be a "thing" (common noun).
Finally, i would add that i sort of see the point here but i am asking above question just for my clarity.
Thanks a lot for immediate response.
Happy learning

Hi manishtank1988 ,

Well, I donot prefer awkwardness as a reason to reject any option unless I don't have any other option.

As per English usage, a thing should be something physical while "a combination" is not any objector physically existing item. The word combination suggests we are combining two things rather than the two things themselves.

Hence, C is incorrect.

Does that make sense?

Absolutely, thanks a lot abhimahna.
Intern
Joined: 02 Sep 2017
Posts: 2
Re: Substantive clauses - What caused the \$100 million museum's approval a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Sep 2017, 19:34
To me, A and C looked grammatically correct (abstract, yeah yeah... I get it now). BUUUUUUT I chose A for a different reason. C just sounded wordier. That's all.
Manager
Status: Searching for something I've been searching..LOL
Joined: 14 Dec 2016
Posts: 63
Location: India
Concentration: Healthcare, Operations
Schools: Ross '20
GMAT 1: 590 Q35 V42
GPA: 3.5
WE: Medicine and Health (Health Care)
Re: Substantive clauses - What caused the \$100 million museum's approval a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Sep 2017, 22:43
manishtank1988 wrote:
What caused the \$100 million museum's approval and construction to take 12 years was a combination of the complexity of the financing requirements and the opposition of several small but vocal constituencies.
A)What caused
B)What has caused
C)The thing that caused
D)That which caused
E)Causing

As has already been posted by abhimahna I guess it would again be a repetition. however I felt I had to voice my reason for choosing A.
Thing by definition is
1. an object that one need not, cannot, or does not wish to give a specific name to.
Ex: "look at that metal rail thing over there"
synonyms: object, article, item, artefact, commodity; More

2. an inanimate material object as distinct from a living sentient being.
"I'm not a thing, not a work of art to be cherished"

The meanings of 'thing' precisely rule out its usage in the present context because "combination" "complexity of financing requirement" and "opposition of several small but vocal constituencies" do not fit into any of the definitions of 'thing'.

This I believe constitutes reason enough to rule out C as an option.
Manager
Joined: 21 Jun 2015
Posts: 51
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V30
GPA: 3.32
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Re: Substantive clauses - What caused the \$100 million museum's approval a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2017, 12:57
1
richterscale09 wrote:
To me, A and C looked grammatically correct (abstract, yeah yeah... I get it now). BUUUUUUT I chose A for a different reason. C just sounded wordier. That's all.

D is perfect here, Hence the answer
VP
Status: It's near - I can see.
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Posts: 1131
Location: India
GMAT 1: 480 Q38 V22
GPA: 3.01
WE: Engineering (Consulting)
Re: Substantive clauses - What caused the \$100 million museum's approval a [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Apr 2018, 05:52
manishtank1988 wrote:
What caused the \$100 million museum's approval and construction to take 12 years was a combination of the complexity of the financing requirements and the opposition of several small but vocal constituencies.

A)What caused

B)What has caused

C)The thing that caused

D)That which caused

E)Causing

A. Correct. What caused X and Y was a combination of something.

B. Present perfect "has" is wrong here.

C. Principal clause here is "The thing was a combination of something". This is nonsensical.

D. That - which does not makes sense.

E. Causing X and Y was a combination. Wrong

_________________

"Do not watch clock; Do what it does. KEEP GOING."

Re: Substantive clauses - What caused the \$100 million museum's approval a   [#permalink] 29 Apr 2018, 05:52
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Events & Promotions

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.