Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
May 1810:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Join us in a live GMAT practice session and solve 25 challenging GMAT questions with other test takers in timed conditions, covering GMAT Quant, Data Sufficiency, Data Insights, Reading Comprehension, and Critical Reasoning questions.
May 1212:00 PM EDT
-11:59 PM EDT
Make the most of your break with the most realistic GMAT™ prep. Take up to $700 off select products. Ends 6/1
May 1501:00 PM IST
-11:00 AM IST
Start your journey with a fully customized action plan and work with a dedicated mentor to achieve a 735+ score.- May 19
12:00 PM PDT
-01:00 PM PDT
Scoring 329 on the GRE is not always about using more books, more courses, or a longer study plan. In this episode of GRE Success Talks, Ashutosh shares his GRE preparation strategy, study plan, and test-day experience, explaining how he kept his prep.... - Jun 10
06:00 AM PDT
-06:15 PM PDT
Register for the GMAT Club Virtual MBA Spotlight Fair – the world’s premier event for serious MBA candidates. This is your chance to hear directly from Admissions Directors at nearly every Top 30 MBA program..
21 Apr 2018, 07:25
Kudos
Bookmarks
Easy one, straight B.
Conclusion: if Congress institutes a subminimum wage, a new lower legal wage for teenagers, the teenage unemployment rate, which has been rising since 1960, will no longer increase. ----employer give job on the basis of need of people. this step will may be decrease there bare min rather decrease employment rate. only B is on the lines.
Conclusion: if Congress institutes a subminimum wage, a new lower legal wage for teenagers, the teenage unemployment rate, which has been rising since 1960, will no longer increase. ----employer give job on the basis of need of people. this step will may be decrease there bare min rather decrease employment rate. only B is on the lines.
ravigupta2912
04 Mar 2021, 22:05
Kudos
Bookmarks
A, D and E were fairly easy eliminations. Between B and C:-
C did not really weaken the argument aka why introducing a new subminimum wage would not work. It presents new info stating that when employers hire extra help - but that may be true since 1960s? So we have no reason to believe that
what argument is saying is incorrect or that the argument is missing out on anything.
B on the other hand gives a counter data that shows even when minimum wage were constant, the teenage unemployment rose or that wages and teenagers may not have had a cause / effect relationship. It might be that there would be some other cause, who knows, but now we have a counterfactual data to question the argument.
C did not really weaken the argument aka why introducing a new subminimum wage would not work. It presents new info stating that when employers hire extra help - but that may be true since 1960s? So we have no reason to believe that
what argument is saying is incorrect or that the argument is missing out on anything.
B on the other hand gives a counter data that shows even when minimum wage were constant, the teenage unemployment rose or that wages and teenagers may not have had a cause / effect relationship. It might be that there would be some other cause, who knows, but now we have a counterfactual data to question the argument.
09 Mar 2022, 10:29
Kudos
Bookmarks
amp0201
Statement E is directly negating something that was said in the passage. Wouldnt that weaken the argument (knowing that not everything that was stated is true)?
Is there a general rule about this for weaken the argument questions? Like if an answer is opposite to something in the passage is it not the answer bc it cant even be true in the first place?
