Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 20:37 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 20:37
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Praetorian
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Last visit: 27 Dec 2017
Posts: 2,868
Own Kudos:
1,705
 [27]
Given Kudos: 781
Posts: 2,868
Kudos: 1,705
 [27]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
22
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
jlyngal
Joined: 23 Aug 2003
Last visit: 06 Oct 2003
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
3
 [1]
Location: ny
Posts: 9
Kudos: 3
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
stolyar
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Last visit: 06 May 2014
Posts: 1,012
Own Kudos:
1,850
 [1]
Posts: 1,012
Kudos: 1,850
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
BicepBrachii
Joined: 22 Jul 2015
Last visit: 02 Sep 2015
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
10
 [3]
Given Kudos: 5
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V45
GPA: 3.92
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V45
Posts: 16
Kudos: 10
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I'm curious as to how so many people chose "D" as the right answer. There's no indication in the question that the water/precipitation levels for Canada have fluctuated "no more than" 3 points in the last decade. For all we know, a study in 1992 could merely be talking about the moisture fluctuations for solely that year. Aren't we all making a HUGE assumption here?

If you were making that assumption, then choice B could be correct as well, aside from the fact that you're comparing two completely unrelated numbers. Can anyone shed any light on this?
avatar
manojsundar1
Joined: 25 Jun 2015
Last visit: 02 Nov 2017
Posts: 139
Own Kudos:
39
 [1]
Given Kudos: 37
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Sustainability
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
WE:Operations (Manufacturing)
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
Posts: 139
Kudos: 39
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
BicepBrachii
I'm curious as to how so many people chose "D" as the right answer. There's no indication in the question that the water/precipitation levels for Canada have fluctuated "no more than" 3 points in the last decade. For all we know, a study in 1992 could merely be talking about the moisture fluctuations for solely that year. Aren't we all making a HUGE assumption here?

If you were making that assumption, then choice B could be correct as well, aside from the fact that you're comparing two completely unrelated numbers. Can anyone shed any light on this?
"research from a 1992 study measures the relational swing in moisture levels at no more than three points"...this is the last line of the passage. It is said in the passage that A stable level is in the range of 2 to 4 units(note the units).Hence,nothing is assumed and D is the correct choice.
hope this helps
avatar
BicepBrachii
Joined: 22 Jul 2015
Last visit: 02 Sep 2015
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
10
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V45
GPA: 3.92
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V45
Posts: 16
Kudos: 10
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
manojsundar1
BicepBrachii
I'm curious as to how so many people chose "D" as the right answer. There's no indication in the question that the water/precipitation levels for Canada have fluctuated "no more than" 3 points in the last decade. For all we know, a study in 1992 could merely be talking about the moisture fluctuations for solely that year. Aren't we all making a HUGE assumption here?

If you were making that assumption, then choice B could be correct as well, aside from the fact that you're comparing two completely unrelated numbers. Can anyone shed any light on this?
"research from a 1992 study measures the relational swing in moisture levels at no more than three points"...this is the last line of the passage. It is said in the passage that A stable level is in the range of 2 to 4 units(note the units).Hence,nothing is assumed and D is the correct choice.
hope this helps

Did you even read my response? My point of contention is that you are assuming that "a research study from 1992" is speaking for the last decade. How can you make that assumption without the passage saying so?

Please don't offer a response if you're not going to contribute anything new; what you have said is simply a rehash of what was said above.

I am not saying that there is a better answer than D among the other answers, but I am making the claim that choice D is a horribly written "right" choice.
avatar
badboson
Joined: 15 Jan 2016
Last visit: 22 Mar 2019
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
164
 [1]
Given Kudos: 38
Posts: 14
Kudos: 164
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Praetorian
Temperatures in the Pacific Northwest have risen steadily since 1981, averaging 2.07 degrees Fahrenheit warmer north of the 46th parallel than in the previous decade. Precipitation and water-table levels, which have historically maintained a measurable relationship to each other (within a scaled range of two to four points), have varied drastically from 1987 to 1991, sometimes deviating as much as six points in fewer than eight months. Reports from Canada indicate a similar median temperature increase, estimated at 2.02 degrees Fahrenheit; research from a 1992 study measures the relational swing in moisture levels at no more than three points.

Of the following, which conclusion is best supported by the evidence above?

The higher the temperature of a given area, the more likely it is that the water levels will vary.

The variation in temperature in the last decade has been less than the fluctuation of moisture.

When temperatures rise north of the 46th parallel, natural water exchange between land and atmosphere must change in the same proportion.

Within the last ten years, water table and precipitation levels have varied more in the Pacific Northwest than they have in Canada.

Canada will have more stability in weather than will the area of the United States above the 46th parallel.


please explain your choice

How would someone know "Precipitation and water-table" is same as "moisture levels", unless he is a SME?

Any thought/idea on how to identify & tackle such technicalities in case we encounter such cases in real GMAT?
User avatar
sayantanc2k
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Last visit: 09 Dec 2022
Posts: 2,393
Own Kudos:
15,523
 [1]
Given Kudos: 26
Location: Germany
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE:Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Expert
Expert reply
Schools:
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
Posts: 2,393
Kudos: 15,523
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
badboson
Praetorian
Temperatures in the Pacific Northwest have risen steadily since 1981, averaging 2.07 degrees Fahrenheit warmer north of the 46th parallel than in the previous decade. Precipitation and water-table levels, which have historically maintained a measurable relationship to each other (within a scaled range of two to four points), have varied drastically from 1987 to 1991, sometimes deviating as much as six points in fewer than eight months. Reports from Canada indicate a similar median temperature increase, estimated at 2.02 degrees Fahrenheit; research from a 1992 study measures the relational swing in moisture levels at no more than three points.

Of the following, which conclusion is best supported by the evidence above?

The higher the temperature of a given area, the more likely it is that the water levels will vary.

The variation in temperature in the last decade has been less than the fluctuation of moisture.

When temperatures rise north of the 46th parallel, natural water exchange between land and atmosphere must change in the same proportion.

Within the last ten years, water table and precipitation levels have varied more in the Pacific Northwest than they have in Canada.

Canada will have more stability in weather than will the area of the United States above the 46th parallel.


please explain your choice

How would someone know "Precipitation and water-table" is same as "moisture levels", unless he is a SME?

Any thought/idea on how to identify & tackle such technicalities in case we encounter such cases in real GMAT?

In real GMAT, one is not expected to use any outside knowledge in order to arrive at the correct answer. Rather, using outside knowledge may sometimes lead to a wrong answer. The subject question appears to be a bit too demanding on this aspect.
User avatar
arvind910619
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Last visit: 18 Oct 2024
Posts: 845
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 755
Status:Learning
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
Posts: 845
Kudos: 607
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Praetorian
Temperatures in the Pacific Northwest have risen steadily since 1981, averaging 2.07 degrees Fahrenheit warmer north of the 46th parallel than in the previous decade. Precipitation and water-table levels, which have historically maintained a measurable relationship to each other (within a scaled range of two to four points), have varied drastically from 1987 to 1991, sometimes deviating as much as six points in fewer than eight months. Reports from Canada indicate a similar median temperature increase, estimated at 2.02 degrees Fahrenheit; research from a 1992 study measures the relational swing in moisture levels at no more than three points.

Of the following, which conclusion is best supported by the evidence above?

The higher the temperature of a given area, the more likely it is that the water levels will vary.

The variation in temperature in the last decade has been less than the fluctuation of moisture.

When temperatures rise north of the 46th parallel, natural water exchange between land and atmosphere must change in the same proportion.

Within the last ten years, water table and precipitation levels have varied more in the Pacific Northwest than they have in Canada.

Canada will have more stability in weather than will the area of the United States above the 46th parallel.


please explain your choice

This was a hard one for me Initially i was not able to make any inference so took a long time to answer this one .
We can see that the average rise of the temperature of the two places in argument north of pacific had 2.07 degrees Fahrenheit whereas Canada had 2.02 degrees Fahrenheit so only option D can be concluded.
User avatar
T1101
Joined: 07 Aug 2018
Last visit: 18 Nov 2021
Posts: 85
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 247
Location: United States (MA)
GMAT 1: 560 Q39 V28
GMAT 2: 670 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 670 Q48 V34
Posts: 85
Kudos: 345
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chesstitans
What is the source of this question? Thank you.

stuck with A and D.
D is much better than A b/c there is not enough information to conclude the correlation between temperature and moisture.

The source is: Princeton Review!

Hope it helps!
User avatar
sherlocked221B
Joined: 30 Jan 2024
Last visit: 23 Sep 2025
Posts: 94
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 344
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q87 V80 DI78
GPA: 8.45
WE:Engineering (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q87 V80 DI78
Posts: 94
Kudos: 69
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
@bunuel @bb @MartyMurray @b_sudharsan @karishmaB
Could you please help here? Thank you!
User avatar
sherlocked221B
Joined: 30 Jan 2024
Last visit: 23 Sep 2025
Posts: 94
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 344
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q87 V80 DI78
GPA: 8.45
WE:Engineering (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q87 V80 DI78
Posts: 94
Kudos: 69
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Praetorian
Temperatures in the Pacific Northwest have risen steadily since 1981, averaging 2.07 degrees Fahrenheit warmer north of the 46th parallel than in the previous decade. Precipitation and water-table levels, which have historically maintained a measurable relationship to each other (within a scaled range of two to four points), have varied drastically from 1987 to 1991, sometimes deviating as much as six points in fewer than eight months. Reports from Canada indicate a similar median temperature increase, estimated at 2.02 degrees Fahrenheit; research from a 1992 study measures the relational swing in moisture levels at no more than three points.

Of the following, which conclusion is best supported by the evidence above?


A. The higher the temperature of a given area, the more likely it is that the water levels will vary.

B. The variation in temperature in the last decade has been less than the fluctuation of moisture.

C. When temperatures rise north of the 46th parallel, natural water exchange between land and atmosphere must change in the same proportion.

D. Within the last ten years, water table and precipitation levels have varied more in the Pacific Northwest than they have in Canada.

E. Canada will have more stability in weather than will the area of the United States above the 46th parallel.
I completely resonate with @bicepbrachi and badboson.

How can one assume the timelines in the question? and How are we expected to know the "Precipitation and water-table" is equivalent to "Moisture Levels"? Similarly Pacific Northwest ~ Area of the United States above the 46th parallel?

I chose Option E here, I could not comment on the last ten years without any given data about the time lines. But rather based on the given information, the data points show more fluctuation in the area of the United States than in Canada; concluding Canada weather might me more stable!
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts