shenwenlim
MartyTargetTestPrep can you disect the meaning of each answer choice? struggling to find a solid reason to eliminate A-D. appreciate the help!
(A) version:
The 151 member governments of the World Bank are expected to increase the bank’s funding by $175 billion, though some United States legislators cite an obstacle to Congressional passage being the concern that the bank’s loans will help foreign producers compete with American businesses.This version conveys the nonsensical meaning that the legislators cite an obstacle. Why would they cite an obstacle?
Also, this version conveys the nonsensical meaning that an obstacle is being a concern.
(B) version:
The 151 member governments of the World Bank are expected to increase the bank’s funding by $175 billion, though some United States legislators cite a concern as an obstacle to Congressional passage that the bank’s loans will help foreign producers compete with American businesses.This version conveys the nonsensical meaning that the legislators cite a concern as an obstacle to Congressional "passage that the bank's loans will help foreign producers compete." There's no way to pass "that the bank's loans will help foreign producers compete."
(C) version:
The 151 member governments of the World Bank are expected to increase the bank’s funding by $175 billion, though some United States legislators cite as an obstacle to Congressional passage the concern that the bank’s loans will help foreign producers compete with American businesses.This version makes sense.
It makes sense to say that the legislators cite, as an obstacle to passage, a certain concern.
Also, "the concern that the bank's loans will help foreign producers compete" makes sense.
(D) version:
The 151 member governments of the World Bank are expected to increase the bank’s funding by $175 billion, though some United States legislators cite the concern, an obstacle to Congressional passage, that the bank’s loans will help foreign producers compete with American businesses.This version portrays the relationship between "the concern" and "an obstacle" in an illogical way. It does not say that the legislators cite the concern as an obstacle. Instead it says that they cite the concern without saying why they cite the concern and simply describes the concern as an obstacle.
In other words, it says essentially, "Legislators cite the concern, an obstacle, that ...." Notice how that statement does not connect the fact that the concern is an obstacle to the legislators' citing of the concern.
(E) version:
The 151 member governments of the World Bank are expected to increase the bank’s funding by $175 billion, though some United States legislators cite as an obstacle for Congress to pass it the concern that the bank’s loans will help foreign producers compete with American businesses."An obstacle
for Congress to pass it" does not make sense. When an obstacle blocks something, it's an "obstacle to" what it is blocking, not an "obstacle for" what it is blocking.
"For" in such a context means "in favor of" or "having the purpose of." An obstacle is not in favor of or having the purpose of Congress to pass something.
Also, there's no referent for "it" since nothing is named that the legislators would pass.