Last visit was: 14 Dec 2024, 21:43 It is currently 14 Dec 2024, 21:43
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 14 Dec 2024
Posts: 14,163
Own Kudos:
41,639
 []
Given Kudos: 5,905
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 14,163
Kudos: 41,639
 []
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Skywalker18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Last visit: 15 Nov 2023
Posts: 2,079
Own Kudos:
9,314
 []
Given Kudos: 171
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
Posts: 2,079
Kudos: 9,314
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Priyanka2018
Joined: 02 Feb 2018
Last visit: 11 Oct 2022
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 615
Posts: 28
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 14 Dec 2024
Posts: 14,163
Own Kudos:
41,639
 []
Given Kudos: 5,905
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 14,163
Kudos: 41,639
 []
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Explanation

Topic and Scope:

Past and more recent astronomical study of hot gas; specifically, how the technology for studying hot gas has improved and what scientists have learned about the gas.

Purpose and Main Idea:

Author shows how study techniques have undergone extensive changes since the 1930s and that, as a result, our knowledge of hot gas has been substantially extended.

Paragraph Structure:

Paragraph 1 defines hot gas and focuses on 1930s studies, which were speculative—scientists lacked technology for more definitive study.
Paragraph 2 moves to the 1970s. The technology has been invented, giving us “a new picture” of hot gas. The paragraph identifies evidence for large volumes of hot gas in space; the observatory Copernicus and satellite Uhuru (circle names like these!) have provided such evidence.
Paragraph 3 speculates about how hot gas may be heated, and draws a distinction between small-scale and large scale masses of gas.

1. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage about “recent study of hot gas” (Highlighted)?

Explanation

The answer to an inference question is generally not explicitly stated in the passage, but will nonetheless be very close to it. (A) is out because earlier studies were not rejected—merely superseded. Checking (B), you find in paragraph 1 the statement that “detailed study...had to await...the chance to observe...outside the earth’s opaque atmosphere.” The next paragraph then discusses recent study. You can infer that recent study has taken place outside the atmosphere. This is the answer—not directly stated but adhering closely to the passage. (C) contradicts the passage with the words “full understanding.” The wording in the last paragraph (“it is believed,” “probably,” and “may”) implies that we lack full understanding. (D) exaggerates a detail in paragraph 3. (E) doesn’t fit the passage’s progression—the studies in the ’70s didn’t use the techniques of the ’30s.

Answer: B

Hope it helps

Priyanka2018
Hi ,

Why is question 1 option C is incorrect?
My understanding: 1) Nothing about evolution of hot gas is stated.
2) Full understanding depends from person to person, so we cannot conclude that it led to full understanding.
Please let me know whether my reasoning is correct.

Thanks in Advance
User avatar
lifeforhuskar
Joined: 20 Feb 2018
Last visit: 13 Aug 2019
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
40
 []
Given Kudos: 56
Location: India
GMAT 1: 610 Q47 V28
GPA: 3.8
GMAT 1: 610 Q47 V28
Posts: 25
Kudos: 40
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
can you explain why 5 answer is B, I don't get it
Thanks
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 14 Dec 2024
Posts: 14,163
Own Kudos:
41,639
 []
Given Kudos: 5,905
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 14,163
Kudos: 41,639
 []
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Official Explanation

5. Which of the following best describes how the second paragraph relates to the first paragraph?

Difficulty Level: 700

Explanation

This question basically asks how the author’s focus changes through the first two paragraphs.
Paragraph 1 discusses the limitations of ‘30s research and explains why new technology was needed.
Paragraph 2 describes how new technology was used in the ‘70s to develop “a new picture” of hot gas.

Checking the choices, (A) is inaccurate. The word “qualifies” means “weakens”; the later studies didn’t conflict with the earlier ones. (Note that the previous question and its choices also picked up on this point.) (B) looks good with “elaborates on developments.” The passage does emphasize development— “elaboration” means refining ideas on the same topic. (C) is faulty because paragraphs 1 and 2 deal with completely different studies. (D) sounds as if the “area of study” changed. The author identifies new technology, but not a more fruitful area of study. (E) mentions the “degree of speculation,” which is incorrect—paragraph 1 cites speculation, but paragraph 2 discusses new knowledge.

Answer: B

lifeforhuskar
can you explain why 5 answer is B, I don't get it
Thanks
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 14 Dec 2024
Posts: 14,163
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5,905
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 14,163
Kudos: 41,639
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bumping up for more discussion.
User avatar
manish_g30
Joined: 13 May 2023
Last visit: 13 Dec 2024
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 13
Products:
Posts: 13
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
First Para:

Study of Hot gas began with the observation of solar atmosphere.
In 1930, Techs were developed to perform the optical study of solar corona during solar eclipses.
The detection of Ionized atoms implied the presence of hot gases.
however, the detailed study has to await the chance to observe the sun at UV and X Ray outside the earth's Atmosphere, as there wavelengths are important to study


SECOND PARA:

RECENT STUDY (1970) began with launching of space observations and gathered data of UV and XRAYS.
This led to a new picture of production and evolution of gas.

Before the 1970, to was not clear, as direct evidence were not there. Although the Theoretical evidence, says that interstellar space in galaxy was thought to be occupied by gas with temp of about 10,000 degrees. In 1970, the evidence reveled as presence of Highly ionized oxygen that could be present at high temp implies the high temp gas there. another Evidence UXray, discovered emissions from Hot gas in space between galaxies.


Third Para
Explain the 2 Mechanism by which the interstellar gas is heated
1. Motion of stars and matter
2. Gravitational Infall



Author Tone: Neutral
Author presents No opinion.


I will go with the elimination method for 1st Question:

1. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage about “recent study of hot gas” (Highlighted)?

(A) It has prompted the rejection of earlier studies of the solar corona. (there is no rejection in passage) (Eliminate)
(B) It has taken place largely outside the earth’s atmosphere. (yes, only option left with)
(C) It has led to full understanding of the production and evolution of hot gas. (Not Full Understanding, we can't comment on that) (Eliminate)
(D) It was aimed primarily at gathering data related to the birth and death of stars. (Out of Scope) Eliminate
(E) It was hindered by astronomers’ dependence on outdated research techniques. (recent Study never get hindered by the Outdated equipment's
)
Eliminate


It is purely, Detail Base, present on the 2nd para
Before 1970, direct evidence for the presence of hot gas in large volumes of space was lacking. Although there were theoretical arguments for pervasive interstellar gas, interstellar space in our galaxy was thought to be occupied by gas with a temperature of about 10,000 degrees K. In the 1970s, however, the observatory Copernicus revealed the widespread presence in our galaxy of highly ionized oxygen that could only be produced at high temperatures.


2. Which of the following is mentioned in the passage as evidence for the presence of hot interstellar gas in our galaxy?

(A) The varying levels of radiation given off by distant stars
(B) The large quantity of ionized atoms detected during solar eclipses
(C) The presence of gas with a temperature of about 10,000 degrees K in our galaxy
(D) The production of highly ionized oxygen in our galaxy
(E) The frequent occurrence of supernovae in our galaxy


3. According to the passage, the Uhuru X-ray satellite has been instrumental in helping to

(A) provide detailed images of the remnants of supernovae in our galaxy
(B) determine the precise sequence of events leading to a supernova
(C) document the widespread presence of hot gas in interstellar space (yes, as it was the another Evidence other than the ionized oxygen) Last line of 2nd Para
(D) identify the different types of particles commonly ejected by stars
(E) measure the varying strength of gravitational fields at galactic centers


4. The author suggests that the studies of the solar atmosphere discussed in the first paragraph

(A) conflict with current assumptions about the extent of the gaseous region surrounding the sun
(no Conflict, as it's the supporting evidence only)
(B) reached conclusions which were overlooked by later studies (no, overlook, even proved by later studies) - Opposite
(C) were constrained by the technology then available to scientists (yes, as they were not able to study the UV and X Ray Wavelengths)
(D) confirmed then-current beliefs about the presence of hot gas between stars (no, old studied didn't confirmed)

(E) are largely irrelevant to recent studies of hot gas


5. Which of the following best describes how the second paragraph relates to the first paragraph?

(A) The second paragraph qualifies a conclusion stated in the first paragraph. (never Qualifies, as Qualifies means evaluate, and in 2nd para, it is supporting and proving the facts of 1st para)
(B) The second paragraph elaborates on developments identified in the first paragraph.
(yes)
(C) The second paragraph examines in detail the particular studies referred to in the first paragraph. (never Examine, as Examine means evaluate, and in 2nd para, it is supporting and proving the facts of 1st para)
(D) The second paragraph identifies a more fruitful area of study than that discussed in the first paragraph. (Out of Context)
(E) The second paragraph illustrates the degree of speculation involved in the studies mentioned in the first paragraph. (Out of Context)
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7163 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
14163 posts